Cases

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed October 2, 2024. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D22-2015 Lower Tribunal No. 2021-24213-CA-01 ________________ Jared Freedman, Appellant,

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed October 4, 2023. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D22-0949 Lower Tribunal No. 20-15081 ________________ Robert Frehling, et al., Appellants,

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed August 13, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D24-1235 Lower Tribunal No. 23-20067-CA-01 ________________ Pedro J. Garcia, etc., et al., Appellants/Cross-Appel

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed March 10, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D20-1719 Lower Tribunal Nos. 19-21218 & 20-15029 ________________ Miramar Marina Corp., Petition

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed April 10, 2024. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D22-1692 Lower Tribunal No. 21-6 ________________ James Goldsmith and Monica Goldsmith, Appellants,

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed March 15, 2023. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D22-835 Lower Tribunal No. 21-18225 ________________ S and A Property Investment Services, LLC, Appellant,

LABARGA, J. This case is before the Court on the Miami-Dade Property Appraiser’s (Property Appraiser) appeal of the Third District Court of Appeal’s decision in De La Mora v. Andonie, 51 So.3d 517 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010).1 In Andonie, the Third District affirmed a circuit court’s grant of an ad valorem homestead tax exemption to David and Ana Andonie (the Taxpayers), and declared a p

SALTER, J. Miami-Dade County, its Property Appraiser, and its Tax Collector (collectively, the “County”), appeal an adverse final summary judgment in favor of Dadeland Station Associates, Ltd. (“Dadeland Station”) regarding the County’s property tax assessment of the land (“Land”) leased by Dadeland Station from the County in 1994. We affirm the trial court’s determination that

SHEPHERD, J. This is an appeal by an adult son, Shane Willens, of a final judgment of the circuit court, re-assessing to full value homestead property upon its devolution to Willens as the remainderman under a deed, pursuant to which his father retained *1115a life estate in the property up until the date of his death.1 The chief detrim

A petition for certification of the judgment in A-004079-15 having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same; It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is denied.

GILBERT, P.J. *1063Jesus Pedro Garcia appeals a judgment the trial court imposed after revoking his postrelease community supervision (PRCS). ( Pen. Code, §§ 3451, 3455.)1 The court imposed a 180-day period of confinement for Garcia's PRCS violation to run consecutively to a four-year prison term in another case.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed.

HARTZ, Circuit Judge. Defendants Pedro Garcia and Gonzalo Ramirez were convicted of conspiring with other members of their criminal gang to violate the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), see 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d). They were also convicted of committing various violent crimes in aid of racketeering, see id. § 1959 (VI

SELYA, Circuit Judge. A federal grand jury sitting in the District of Puerto Rico indicted defendants-appellants Nelson J. Del Rosario and Pedro Pacheco, along with a third man, Miguel Pérez, on charges of conspiring to distribute controlled substances. See 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a), 846. The operative bill — the superseding indictment handed up on May 2, 2001 — also c

In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo No. 07-18-00388-CR PEDRO GARCIA, JR., APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE On Appeal from the 364th District Court Lubbock County, Texas

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana No. 06-19-00010-CR PEDRO WALTER GARCIA, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 Williamson County, Texas Trial Court No. 18-04804-2 Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ. ORDER

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana No. 06-19-00010-CR PEDRO WALTER GARCIA, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 Williamson County, Texas Trial Court No. 18-04804-2 Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Burgess

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-17-00081-CR JUAN PEDRO GARCIA APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE ---------- FROM THE 396TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRAN

98 P.3d 1044 (2004) 136 N.M. 394 2004-NMCA-114 Bennie GARCIA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Officer J. GORDON, Valencia County Sheriff's Department and Valencia County, Defendants-Appellees. No. 23,933. Court of Appeals of New Mexico. July 22, 2004. Michael R. Griego, Pedro G. Rael, Rael and Sanchez, Los Lunas, NM, for Appel

DECISION HODGSON, Chief Judge: There is no dispute as to the facts. The appellant was chosen at random by compute er to participate in a urinalysis inspection which disclosed the presence of cocaine metabolites in his urine as confirmed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry analysis. The results of this test plus the testimony of a witness with a Doctorate in Analytical Chemistry and who was a board-cer