⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

4 opinions for “Pedro Araujo and Diana Araujo”

State of Texas, Acting by and Through the Texas Facilities Commission, for and on Behalf of the Texas Health and Human Services Commission; The Texas Facilities Commission; Mike Novak, in His Official Capacity as Executive Director of the Texas Facilities Commission; The Texas Health and Human Services Commission; And Rolland Niles in His Official Capacity as Deputy Executive Commissioner for the System Support Services Division of the Texas Health and Human Services Commission v. 8317 Cross Park, LLCpublic domain
Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District · 2025-08-08 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV
read the full opinion · at the source · see the docket → · find the judge →
State of Texas, the Texas Facilities Commission, the Texas Health and Human Services Commission, Mike Novak, in His Official Capacity as Executive Director of the TFC, and Rolland Niles, in His Official Capacity as Deputy Executive Commissioner for the System Support Services Division of the Texas Health and Human Services Commission v. Broadmoor Austin Associates, a Texas Joint Venturepublic domain
Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District · 2025-08-08 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV
read the full opinion · at the source · see the docket → · find the judge →
Wieland v. Assaf (In re Briones-Coroy)public domain
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 2012-10-23 · Published · cited 10× · 481 B.R. 685
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER SIDNEY B. BROOKS, Bankruptcy Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction .690 II. Summary.691 A. A Summary of this Opinion.691 B. The Enactment of 11 U.S.C. § 110 in the Reform Act of 1994 .692 C. The 2005 Amendments .693 D. The Unintended Consequences of 11 U.S.C. § 110.694
read the full opinion · at the source · see the docket → · find the judge →
In Re Norplant Contraceptive Products Liability Litigationpublic domain
District Court, E.D. Texas · 2002-08-14 · Published · cited 27× · 215 F. Supp. 2d 795; 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16929; 2002 WL 1869869
215 F.Supp.2d 795 (2002) In re NORPLANT CONTRACEPTIVE PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION. MDL No. 1038. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division. August 14, 2002. *796 *797 Christopher Matthew Parks, Parker & Parks, Port Arthur, TX, for Plaintiffs. F. Lane Heard III, Williams
read the full opinion · at the source · see the docket → · find the judge →