Cases

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 21a0227p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT SOFCO ERECTORS, INC., ┐ Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, │

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 15a0167p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ┐ Plaintiff-Appellant, │

AMENDED OPINION WHITE, Circuit Judge. The United States appeals from the district court’s denial of its motion for summary judgment and grant of the State of Ohio’s and Buckingham Coal Company’s (“Buckingham”) motions for summary judgment in this action challenging Ohio’s right to lease Buckingham the right to mine coal lying beneath land acquired for a flo

631 F.Supp.2d 935 (2009) STAR LOCK SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff, v. TRITEQ LOCK AND SECURITY, L.L.C., Defendant. Case No. 2:07-cv-797. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. June 26, 2009. *936 Thomas Brennan Ridgley, Peter A. Lusenhop, Vorys Sater Seymour & Pease, Columbus, OH, William H. Oldach, III, Vorys S

285 F.3d 415 Elaine L. CHAO, Secretary of the United States Department of Labor, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.HALL HOLDING COMPANY, INC., David L. Goldman, Kathleen A. Keating, George A. Ahearn, Michael F. Shields, and Goldman Financial Group, Inc., Defendants-Appellants. No. 99-4142. No. 00-3041. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argue

MEMORANDUM OPINION KEVIN R. HUENNEKENS, Bankruptcy Judge. The debtors, Circuit City Stores, Inc., et al, (the “Debtors,” or “Circuit City”) filed these bankruptcy cases under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on November 10, 2008 (the “Petition Date”).1 The Debtors’ bankruptcy cases were consolidated for joint administration pursuant to Rule 1015(b) of the Fed

OPINION {¶ 1} Defendant-appellants, Randil J. Rudloff, as executor of the estate of Edna M. Jarman, Robert W. Ellis, and Sandra Lee Ellis appeal the decision of the Trumbull County Court of Common Pleas, granting summary judgment in favor of plaintiff-appellee, Beneficial Ohio, Inc., in a foreclosure action. For the following reasons, we reverse the decision of the court below.

437 F.Supp.2d 706 (2006) Angela KLAUS, Plaintiff, v. HILB, ROGAL & HAMILTON CO. OF OHIO (a/k/a Berwanger Overmyer Associates). Defendant. No. C2-04-034. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. June 30, 2006. *707 *708 *709

OPINION AND ORDER GRAHAM, District Judge. This action was filed on January 18, 1994 by plaintiff Ohio Valley Coal Company against the trustees of the United Mine Workers of America (“UMWA”) 1974 Pension Trust and the UMWA Combined Benefit Fund. Plaintiff is a signatory to the 1988 National Bituminous Coal Wage Agreement (“the Agreement”) with the UMWA. Article XX, § (d)(l)(v) of the Agreement contains a

92 F.3d 384 Barbara KENTY, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.BANK ONE, COLUMBUS, N.A., and Transamerica Premier InsuranceCompany, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-4211. United States Court of Appeals,Sixth Circuit. Reargued Feb. 7, 1996.Decided Aug. 5, 1996.Rehearing and Suggestionfor Rehearing En BancDenied Sept. 19, 1996.

35 F.Supp.2d 582 (1999) IRON WORKERS LOCAL UNION NO. 17 INSURANCE FUND and its Trustees, et al., Plaintiffs, v. PHILIP MORRIS, INC., et al., Defendants. No. 1:97-CV-1422. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. February 3, 1999. *583 *584 Eben O. McNair, Timothy Joseph Galla

122 F.Supp.2d 582 (2000) William KRESSEN, Plaintiff, v. FEDERAL INSURANCE CO., Chubb & Son, Inc. (a.k.a. Chubb Group of Insurance Companies), Chubb Insurance Company of New Jersey, Henderson & Phillips, Inc.(a.k.a. Henderson & Phillips Insurance), and John Doe, Defendants. Civil No. 1999-181. District Court, Virgin Islands, D. St. Croix. May 8, 2000.

*641OPINION AND ORDER MICHAEL H. WATSON, JUDGE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Lead Plaintiff, City of Pontiac General Employees’ Retirement System (“City of Pontiac”), moves for class certification as well as for appointment of itself and Teamsters Local 237 Additional Security Benefit Fund (“Local 237”) as Class Representatives and the law firm Robbin

ORDER GWIN, District Judge. On January 8, 1998, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss this cause for plaintiffs’ failure to join necessary parties pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(7) and Rule 19 [Doc. 28].1 In this motion, defendants argue that plaintiffs must join others who may have claim against defendants. Defendants suggest *51

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER KETANJI BROWN JACKSON, United States District Judge Plaintiffs Sebastian Njang,. Marco Washington, and Joyce Ejikunle were employed as security guards at a federal government office building in the District of Columbia in 2009, when the events at issue in this lawsuit took place. All three plaintiffs allege that the private s

Decision Granting Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Complaint Guy R. Humphrey, United States Bankruptcy Judge I. Introduction The White Family Companies, Inc. (“WFC”), the holder of an allowed claim in this Chapter 7 case, filed a complaint seeking to equitably subordinate the claim of another creditor, PNC Bank (“PNC”),1 to all other non-priority unsecured cre

[Cite as DIRECTV, Inc. v. Levin, 128 Ohio St.3d 68, 2010-Ohio-6279.] DIRECTV, INC. ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. LEVIN, TAX COMMR., APPELLEE. [Cite as DIRECTV, Inc. v. Levin, 128 Ohio St.3d 68, 2010-Ohio-6279.] Taxation — Sales tax — R.C. 5739.01(B)(3)(p) — Satellite-broadcasting services — Taxation of sales of satellite-broadcasting services but not of cable- broadcasting services does not violate Commerce Clause of United States Constitution — Differential tax treat

[Cite as Niskanen v. Giant Eagle, Inc., 122 Ohio St.3d 486, 2009-Ohio-3626.] NISKANEN, APPELLEE, v. GIANT EAGLE, INC., APPELLANT, ET AL. [Cite as Niskanen v. Giant Eagle, Inc., 122 Ohio St.3d 486, 2009-Ohio-3626.] Civil actions — Negligence — Damages — Punitive damages are not recoverable without award of compensatory damages — Presence of actual malice does not entitle party to recovery of punitive damages if no compensatory damages awarded — Self-defense is

548 F.Supp.2d 472 (2008) Sarah MORR, Plaintiff, v. KAMCO INDUSTRIES, INC., Defendant. Case No. 3:07CV2046. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division. April 15, 2008. *475 Timothy C. Holtsberry, Defiance, OH, for Plaintiff. Chris J. North, Alicia M. Chiu, Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease, Columbus, OH, for

BOUDIN, Circuit Judge. Before us are cross-appeals stemming from a well known incident: the theft from TJX computers of customer credit and debit card information and the subsequent fraudulent use of the information. See generally In re TJX Cos. Retail Sec. Breach Litig., 493 F.Supp.2d 1382 (D.Mass.2007); McMorris v. TJX, 493 F.Supp.2d 158 (D.Mass.2007). Law suits ensued, this case — involving banks injured