Cases

Melton, Justice. Following a jury trial, Jesus Ojeda Jimenez was found guilty of murder and various other offenses in connection with the stabbing death of his wife, Liliana Ruiz. 1 On appeal, Jimenez contends that the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to support the jury’s verdict. We affirm.

OPINION Chief Justice SUTTELL, for the Court. The defendant, Carlos Jimenez, appeals from a judgment of conviction on two counts of first-degree sexual assault. The defendant had been accused by his sister-in-law, Mary,1 of sexually assaulting her while she was too intoxicated to resist. The defendant raises three issues on appeal. First, the defendant argues that

OPINION This case came before the Court on April 12, 1999 pursuant to an order directing the defendant to appear and show cause why the issues raised in his appeal from a final judgment of conviction in the Superior Court, on one count of wrongful conversion and one count of knowingly making a false statement of a crime, should not be summarily decided. After hearing the arguments of counsel and reviewing the memoranda submitted by the parties,

440 F.3d 514 UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Lenny JIMÉNEZ-BELTRE, a/k/a Tony Pérez, Héctor Cintrón, Héctor Guzmán-Rivera, Defendant, Appellant. No. 05-1268. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Heard January 12, 2006. Decided March 9, 2006. Jame

PER CURIAM: Antonio Jimenez-Martinez appeals the district court’s revocation of supervised release and the imposition of a ten month sentence of imprisonment under 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e). We AFFIRM. I. FACTS After being indicted in June, 1990, Jimenez pleaded guilty to one count of

DUHÉ, Circuit Judge: Defendant, Juan Jimenez and his eode-fendant, Christopher D’Cunha, were each convicted of one count of conspiracy to commit mail fraud and nine counts of mail fraud after a joint trial. Jimenez was sentenced to 18 months imprisonment, 3 years supervised release and $182,062 in restitution payable to Sphere Supply Inc. (Sphere), the victim of the fraud. Jimenez

In the Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana No. 06-23-00249-CR PAULA DENISE DIXON HAWKINS, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 188th District Court Gregg County, Texas Trial Court No. 53960-A Before Stevens, C.J., van Cleef and Rambin, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Rambin

Filed 10/2/19 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR SAMUEL ZAMUDIO JIMENEZ, B297595 Petitioner, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. VA036217) v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent; THE PEOPLE,

Opinion filed March 28, 2013 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-11-00201-CR __________ SNOW ANN JIMENEZ, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 259th District Co

240 S.W.3d 384 (2007) Rosa Estella JIMENEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 03-05-00633-CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, Austin. August 31, 2007. Rehearing Overruled September 27, 2007. *387 Leonard Martinez, Karyl Anderson Krug, The Law Office of Karyl Krug, P.C., Austin, for Appellant. Rona

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-05-00633-CR Rosa Estella Jimenez, Appellant v.

TEXTO COMPLETO DE LA SENTENCIA El Sr. Félix Roberto Jiménez, en adelante, Sr. Jiménez, recurre de una resolución emitida por el Tribunal de Primera Instancia, Sala de San Juan, pl 30 de septiembre de 1999 y notificada el 4 de octubre del mismo año, la cual declaró No Ha Lugar la oposición del Sr. Jiménez a ser encontrado incurso en desacato, so pena de cárcel, por supuestas deudas alimentarias y pautó vista para continuar con los proced

ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of - ) ) Amentum Services, Inc. ) ASBCA No. 63527 ) Under Contract No. W9124G-17-C-0005 ) APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: Terry L. Elling, Esq. Amy L. Fuentes, Esq.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER James O. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Memorandum in Support, filed November 4, 2015 (Doc. 22)(“Mo-*1013tion”). The Court held a hearing on December 1, 2015. The primary issues are: (i) whether the propose

PER CURIAM. The appellant, Paula Mabrey, pled guilty to two counts of aggravated assault on a police officer, one count of possession of a fraudulent prescription and one count of forgery. The trial court sentenced the appellant to twelve (12) years imprisonment with minimum mandatory terms of one year for each count of aggravated assault on a police officer, to run concurrently. In determining the guidel

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX 28-SEP-2020 08:31 AM SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I DOLE FOOD COMPANY, INC.; DOLE FRESH FRUIT COMPANY;

05/28/1987 Default Event GRANTED 07/08/1987 App for WOE / Disposed NRE This is an appeal from a summary judgment granted in favor of appellee, City of San Antonio. Appellants are Naomi Robinson and her fifteen year old son, Paul Carmona. Appellants sought damages, alleging that the negligence of city employees resulted in the death of four year old Melissa Robinson who was Robinson's daughter and Carmona's sister. The facts giving rise to the suit are as follows. Naomi Robinson

Federal Natl. Mtge. Assn. v Sanchez (2019 NY Slip Op 03767) Federal Natl. Mtge. Assn. v Sanchez 2019 NY Slip Op 03767 Decided on May 15, 2019 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporti

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alison Y. Tuitt, J.), entered July 26, 2012, in this CPLR article 78 proceeding brought by petitioner tenant to annul respondent’s determination to terminate her tenancy, granting the application to the extent of remanding the matter to respondent for imposition of a lesser penalty, unanimously vacated, the petition treated as one transferred to this Court for de novo review, and, upon such review, the challenged det

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alison Y. Tuitt, J.), entered July 26, 2012, in this CPLR article 78 proceeding brought by petitioner tenant to annul respondent’s determination to terminate her tenancy, granting the application to the extent of remanding the matter to respondent for imposition of a lesser penalty, unanimously vacated, the petition treated as one transferred to this Court for de novo review, and, upon such review, the challenged det