Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Paula Elaine Gregory”
503 F.Supp.2d 1054 (2007) UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. Brian N. HOLLNAGEL and BCI Aircraft Leasing, Inc., Defendants. No. 07 C 4538. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. August 22, 2007. *1055 Gregory Paul Von Schaumburg, Robin Andrews, U.S. Securities & Exchange Co
ACCEPTED 04-14-00829-cv 04-14-00829-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXA
United States v. Joyce Elaine Polasekpublic domain
KING, Circuit Judge: Defendant-appellant Joyce Elaine Polasek appeals her conviction and sentence for conspiracy, making false statements relating to mileage registered on odometers, mail fraud, and utterance and possession of counterfeited and forged securities. We reverse. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Joyce Elaine Polas
in Re Nettie Bivenspublic domain
NUMBER 13-20-00563-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG IN RE NETTIE BIVENS, ET AL. On Petition for Writ of Injunction. MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Benavides, Longoria, and Tijerina Memorandum Opinion
Davis v. Statepublic domain
316 Ga. 418 FINAL COPY S23A0166. DAVIS v. THE STATE. LAGRUA, Justice. Appellant Garrett Davis was convicted of felony murder in connection with the shooting death of Eugene Stinchcomb.1 On appeal, Davis contends that (1) the evidence was legally insufficient to support his convictions, (2) his trial counsel provided constitutionally ineffective assistance, (3) the trial court erred by failing to instruct the jury on confession corroboration,
In Re Potash Antitrust Litigationpublic domain
686 F.Supp.2d 816 (2010) In re POTASH ANTITRUST LITIGATION. Nos, 08 C 6910, MDL No. 1996. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. February 23, 2010. *818 Anna M. Horning Nygren, Craig S. Davis, Heidi M. Silton, Matthew R. Salzwedel, W. Joseph Bruckner, Lockridge Grindal Nauen P.L.L.P., Minneapolis, MN, Bruce L. Sim
in Re Eduardo Del Pinopublic domain
Opinion issued March 4, 2021 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-20-00674-CV ——————————— IN RE EDUARDO DEL PINO, SPRING DEL PINO, ROBERT RUGGLES, GLORIA RUGGLES, ROBERT DAWKINS, DEMETRIA DAWKINS, EDDIE DELANEY, JENNIFER DELANEY, LEROY DELK, CAROLE DELK, MARTI
Ackerman v. Exxonmobil Corp.public domain
Affirmed by published opinion. Chief Judge TRAXLER wrote the opinion, in which Judge GREGORY concurred. Judge DUNCAN wrote a separate opinion concurring in the judgment. TRAXLER, Chief Judge: ExxonMobil Corporation (“Exxon”) and John R. Hicks (together, “Defendants”) appeal a district court order abstaining from exercising jurisdiction under the Colorado River doctrine in a case
Whitman v. Denzikpublic domain
882 N.E.2d 260 (2008) James D. WHITMAN and Elaine L. Whitman, Appellants-Plaintiffs, v. Edward J. DENZIK and Robin L. Denzik, Appellees-Defendants. No. 31A05-0703-CV-166. Court of Appeals of Indiana. March 12, 2008. *262 Bryan Lee Ciyou, Ciyou & Dixon, P.C., Indianapolis, IN, Gregory Martin Reger, Lorch & Naville, LLC, Ne
O'Connell v. Hove, Jr.public domain
JACOBS, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs are employees of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) who claim that the FDIC improperly classified their jobs as exempt from the overtime provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-19 (1982). Upon motion by the FDIC, and after a hearing, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New Yor
253 F.Supp.2d 459 (2003) NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE, Plaintiff, v. ACUSPORT CORP., et al., Defendants. Faber Brothers, Inc., Third Party Plaintiff, v. Massachusetts Bay Insurance Company, Third Party Defendants. No. 99 CV 7037(JBW), 99 CV 3999(JBW). United States District Court, E.D. New York. March 28, 2003. Charles E. Ba
DATE: 11/13/2018 PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION PAGE: 1 TIME: 15:29:24 NON-COMPLIANT LAWYERS USER ID: jilgenfr ACTIVE REPORT: ctrk_crt SORT BY : COUNTY CODE, LAWYER LAST NAME CRITERIA: COMPLIANCE YEAR END DATE = 04302018 GROUP 1, REINST FEE ASSESSED _______________________________________________________
Hampton v. Dillard Department Stores, Inc.public domain
18 F.Supp.2d 1256 (1998) Paula Darlene HAMPTON, Plaintiff, v. DILLARD DEPARTMENT STORES, INC., Defendant. No. CIV.A. 97-2182-KHV. United States District Court, D. Kansas. August 27, 1998. *1257 *1258 *1259 *1260 Arthur A
NOTICE: The attorneys on the attached list have the opportunity to comply with outstanding requirements prior to the effective date of the Supreme Court Order and not be administratively suspended. DATE: 11/14/2023 PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION PAGE: 1 TIME: 14:.42:19 NON- COMPLIANT LAWYERS USER ID: jilgenfr
Salvatierra v. National Indemnity Co.public domain
133 Ariz. 16 (1982) 648 P.2d 131 Francisco Mendoza SALVATIERRA; Servando Gonzales Garcia; Tim Rollins; Walter J. Warren; Amedo R. Pino; Salvador Carrascotoriz; Fernando Esquer; Francisco Azcona Astiazaran; Otto Binder; Kenneth F. Wagner and Barbara Wagner, husband and wife; George T. Gregory, Jr., and Nina M. Gregory, husband and wife; James L. Stonebreaker and Janice Stonebreaker, husband and wife; and Granger L. Vinall, Plaintif
Neal v. Director, D.C. Department of Correctionspublic domain
400 F.Supp.2d 134 (2005) Besseye NEAL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DIRECTOR, D.C. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 93-2420 (RCL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. November 22, 2005. *135 Ted Justice Williams, Avis E. Buchanan, DC, Public Defender Service, Jeffrey Fred Liss, Mary Elizab
San Jacinto River Authority v. Vicente Medinapublic domain
Opinion issued November 26, 2024 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-23-00013-CV ——————————— SAN JACINTO RIVER AUTHORITY, Appellant V. VICENTE MEDINA; ASHLEY MEDINA; ARIS ANTONIOU; TODD ALLEN; DEAMON BEEMA
Gonzalez-Burgueno v. National Indemnity Co.public domain
*384OPINION BIRDSALL, Judge. This appeal arises from the trial court’s denial of National Indemnity Company’s motion to intervene in the underlying tort action wherein Rudolfo Gonzalez-Burgueno is the plaintiff and The Esquire for Men, Inc., et al., are defendants. The trial court also denied a motion to set aside a judgment for $200,000 entered again
Sherman v. County of Suffolkpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER SPATT, District Judge. On May 26, 2011, the Plaintiff Steven Sherman (the “Plaintiff’) filed the present action against the Defendants, his former employers the County of Suffolk (“Suffolk County”); the Suffolk County Sheriffs Department, and his former supervisors a Corrections Officer with the surname Tschantre (“Tschantre”), a Corrections Officer with the surname Hemmen
308 F.3d 1233 Donald O'CONNOR, et al., Plaintiffs, andBenjamin M. Aban, Donald N. Adaniya, Rolando R. Alvarado, Joseph A. Alvitre, Larry Andrews, Jeannett Armstrong, Robert G. Ashmore, Lee E. Austin, David K. Bahl, Lawrence R. Barron, Kenneth R. Battle, Jeanette Binion, Royce Binion, Eleanor M. Bishop, Gaetane M. Boutin, Thomas R. Boyden, Deena J. Bradshaw, Shadrach Breaux, Stephen G. Broich, Michael C. Brown, Yulanda S. Brown, David S. Buchana