⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Paul Peek”

Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2019-08-27 · Published · cited 0×
Judgment rendered at ____________ p.m. on August 27, 2019. No. 53,265-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA ***** CHARLES LEE GRAY, Plaintiff-Appellees ARTHUR LEONARD SEALY, III, AND PAUL EDWARD PEEK, SR. versus JASON TREVOR BR
District Court, W.D. New York · 2008-03-18 · Published · cited 1× · 551 F. Supp. 2d 159; 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21308; 2008 WL 732794
(2008) Patricia Ipaven CLARKE and Townsend Clarke, Plaintiffs, v. PEEK `N PEAK RECREATION, INC., Defendant. No. 05-CV-595. United States District Court, W.D. New York. March 18, 2008. ORDER RICHARD J. ARCARA, Chief Judge. This case was referred to Magistrate Judge Jeremiah J. McCarthy, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Defendant filed a moti
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959-04-09 · Published · cited 15× · 263 F.2d 877
RIVES, Circuit Judge. The appellants were indicted on 21 counts, all but five of which — Counts 1, 6, 13, 20, and 21 — were dismissed on motion. Count 1 charges both appellants with conspiracy; Count 6 charges the appellant Peek with bribery; Counts 13, 20, and 21 charge the appellant Wagner with making false entries of competitive
Mayfield v. Peekpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Texas · 2017-02-28 · Published · cited 4× · 546 S.W.3d 253
ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice At its core, this case involves two siblings fighting over an inheritance from their parents. The two principal issues before us are not so much the merits of the dispute, but whether one sibling has standing to complain of the other's actions, and in what court this fight should take place. Appellant Linda Mayfield claimed in part that her brother, Appellee Gary Bruce Peek, (Bruce)1
Peek v. Brickeypublic domain
Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1989-11-06 · Published · cited 0× · 300 Ark. 354; 779 S.W.2d 152; 1989 Ark. LEXIS 499
David Newbern, Justice. The chancery court awarded a judgment of foreclosure to the appellant, Peggie Peek, who was the mortgagee. She appeals because the court refused to award interest on the mortgage debt which was evidenced by an installment note for $35,000. The principal appellees are William C. Brickey and his wife, Barbara Brickey, who have cross-appealed the chancellor’s holding against their con
Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth) · 2015-01-16 · Published · cited 0×
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH In the twenty (20) causes listed immediately hereunder the following was entered: Pursuant to and in compliance with an Order of the Supreme Court of Texas, signed December 15, 2014, Misc. Docket No. 14-9246, it is ordered that these causes be transferred to the Eighth Court of Appeals at El Paso, Texas, and that the Clerk of this Co
U.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1987-06-17 · Published · cited 0× · 24 M.J. 750; 1987 CMR LEXIS 431
OPINION OF THE COURT De GIULIO, Judge: Appellant was tried by a general court-martial composed of officer members. Pursuant to his pleas he was found guilty of sodomy with his natural daughter, a child under the age of sixteen, in violation of Article 125, Uniform Code of Military Justice [hereinafter cited as UCMJ], 10 U.S.C. § 925, (1984). He was sentenced to a dishonorable discharge, confinement for three
Peek v. Williamspublic domain
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970-07-20 · Published · cited 0× · 237 So. 2d 626; 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 8677
PER CURIAM. Affirmed.
Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1985-05-28 · Published · cited 0× · 286 Ark. 147; 690 S.W.2d 120; 1985 Ark. LEXIS 2017
George Rose Smith, Justice. The controlling question in this appeal is the validity of a local rule of the Pulaski Chancery Court by which a pending case may be dismissed without notice to the parties or attorneys if there has been no activity in the case for three years or more. The trial court upheld the local rule and refused to set aside a dismissal order. This appeal by the party whose ca
Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana) · 2011-08-16 · Published · cited 0×
Peek v. Statepublic domain
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003-05-21 · Published · cited 135× · 106 S.W.3d 72; 2003 WL 21185880
106 S.W.3d 72 (2003) Rosana and Robert Dale PEEK, Appellants, v. The STATE of Texas. Nos. 2377-01, 2378-01. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas. May 21, 2003. John H. Hagler, Dallas, for Appellant. Susan Hawk, Asst. DA, Dallas, Matthew Paul, State's Atty., Austin, for State. OPINION KEASLER, J., delivered the opinion of the Court
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2015-12-16 · Published · cited 0×
Order entered December 16, 2015 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-15-00801-CV JAY SANDON COOPER, Appellant V. JUDGE PAUL MCNULTY, Appellee On Appeal from the 219th Judicial District Court
Schauer v. Peekpublic domain
California Supreme Court · 1942-08-04 · Published · cited 1× · 20 Cal. 2d 681; 128 P.2d 337; 1942 Cal. LEXIS 325
20 Cal.2d 681 (1942) B. REY SCHAUER et al., Petitioners, v. PAUL PEEK, as Secretary of State, etc., Respondent. S. F. No. 16796. Supreme Court of California. In Bank. Aug. 4, 1942. Schauer, Ryon & McMahon for Petitioners. Paul Peek in pro. per., Earl Warren, Attorney General, and ChaS.W. Johnson, Deputy Attorney General, for Respondent. THE C
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011-01-21 · Published · cited 112× · 630 F.3d 1346; 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 1191; 2011 WL 182819
630 F.3d 1346 (2011) PEEK-A-BOO LOUNGE OF BRADENTON, INC., a Florida Corporation d.b.a. Peek-A-Boo Lounge, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MANATEE COUNTY, FLORIDA, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, Defendant-Appellee. No. 09-16438. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. January 21, 2011. *1347 Luke Charles Lirot
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2017-06-02 · Published · cited 0×
06/02/2017 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs April 11, 2017 PAUL RICHARDSON v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County No. 05-03372 Glenn Ivy Wright, Judge ___________________________________
Orr v. Peekpublic domain
Supreme Court of Florida · 1938-07-05 · Published · cited 0× · 187 So. 918; 134 Fla. 896
Writ of error dismissed on motion of counsel for the respective parties.
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2015-12-12 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 05-15-00801-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 12/14/20
Orr v. Peekpublic domain
Supreme Court of Florida · 1940-03-01 · Published · cited 2× · 194 So. 341; 142 Fla. 160; 1940 Fla. LEXIS 1337
Writ of error from the circuit court of Orange County. Clifton W. Orr, being lessee of certain property in Orlando, Florida, entered into an oral lease of the premises from month to month with Paul Peck. Peek failed to pay the rent for several months, and distress warrant was issued pursuant to Section 5424 (3560) C. G. L. Sheriff levied on all the personal property on the premises, and an order was entered by the circuit court finding rent in the amount of $620.00 to be due Orr and ordering
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2003-11-20 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs September 23, 2003 MICHAEL ANDERSON PEEK v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Hamilton County No. 237930 Douglas A. Meyer, Judge No. E2003-00449-CCA-R3-PC November 20, 2003 A Hamilton County jury convic
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017-11-08 · Published · cited 0× · 230 So. 3d 925
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA SURF WORKS, L.L.C., and NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO NADIME KARAN KOWKABANY, FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED Petitioners, CASE NO. 1D16-3312 v. CITY OF JACKSONVILLE BEACH,