Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
7 opinions for “Paul M Micenko”
Busby v. Capital One, N.A.public domain
772 F.Supp.2d 268 (2011) Wanda BUSBY, Plaintiff, v. CAPITAL ONE, N.A. et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 10-1025 (RMU). United States District Court, District of Columbia. March 28, 2011. *272 Wanda Busby, Washington, DC, pro se. Anand V. Ramana, McGuirewoods LLP, McLean, VA, David N. Prensky, Chasen & Chasen, Washin
Busby v. Capital One, N.A.public domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WANDA BUSBY, : : Plaintiff, : Civil Action No.: 10-1025 (RMU) : v. : Re Document Nos.: 6, 8 : CAPITAL ONE, N.A. et
(2008) Emile MAZLOUM, Plaintiff, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 06-0002 (JDB). United States District Court, District of Columbia. September 15, 2008. MEMORANDUM OPINION JOHN D. BATES, District Judge. A jury trial commenced in this case on April 23, 2008. At the close of pla
584 F.2d 1235 17 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 1252, 17 Empl. Prac.Dec. P 8576John R. NOVOTNY, Appellant,v.GREAT AMERICAN FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOCIATION, John A.Virostek, Joseph E. Bugel, John J. Dravecky, Daniel T.Kubasak, Edward J. Lesko, James E. Orris, Joseph A.Prokopovitsh, John G. Micenko and Frank J. Vanek. No. 77-1756. United States Court of Appeals,Third Circ
Moore v. United Statespublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION BERYL A. HOWELL, United States District Judge TABLE OF CONTENTS I. BACKGROUND ... 5 A. Factual Overview ... 5 B. Procedural History ... 10 1. Plaintiffs Initiation of Two Lawsuits ... 11 2. Key Judicial Decisions ... 12
OPINION OF THE COURT ADAMS, Circuit Judge. Advocacy of equal rights has seldom been a completely secure vocation. Whether out of fear or for less attractive motives, certain individuals view the advance of equality as a threat to be opposed. Those who take up the cause of equal rights run the risk that their persons and property will suffer the consequences of their opponents’ hostility. In days past, this
539 F.Supp. 437 (1982) John R. NOVOTNY, Plaintiff, v. GREAT AMERICAN FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOCIATION, Defendant. Betty BATIS and Shirley Flockhart, Plaintiffs, v. GREAT AMERICAN FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOCIATION, Defendant. Civ. A. Nos. 76-1580, 76-1581. United States District Court, W. D. Pennsylvania. May 17, 1982.