⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Paul J. Cain”

Cain v. Aragonpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016-01-25 · Published · cited 0× · 632 F. App'x 517
*518ORDER AND JUDGMENT** PAUL KELLY, JR., Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-Appellant Paul Cain appeals from the district court’s sua sponte dismissal of his civil rights complaint filed on his behalf and on behalf of sixteen prisoners incarcerated in Otero County Prison Facility in Chaparral, New Mexico. Citizens of New Mexico
Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2017-03-24 · Published · cited 37× · 2017 WL 1101804; 2017 Md. LEXIS 141; 156 A.3d 807; 452 Md. 141
Dissenting Opinion by Getty, J., which Harrell, J., joins. I respectfully dissent from the Majority’s conclusion that Midland waived its right to arbitrate the current class action *164lawsuit by filing a collection action against Mr. Cain in 2009. Even if Midland had the option, und
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Iowa · 2007-05-21 · Published · cited 4× · 374 B.R. 672; 2007 Bankr. LEXIS 2703; 2007 WL 2331831
374 B.R. 672 (2007) Theodore Blair BURGHOFF, Debtor. Michael Cain and Charlotte Cain, Plaintiffs, v. Theodore B. Burghoff, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 05-10947, Adversary No. 05-30210. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Iowa. May 21, 2007. *673 *674 *675
Cain v. Angelonepublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002-08-02 · Published · cited 0× · 39 F. App'x 947
PER CURIAM: Robin L. Cain seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on her petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2002). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Cain v. Angelone, No. CA-01-398-7 (W.D.Va. M
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009-03-03 · Published · cited 2× · 2009 Ohio 1015
OPINION {¶ 1} This timely appeal comes for consideration upon the record in the trial court and the parties' briefs. Appellant, Lance C. Cain, appeals the June 9, 2008 decision of the Mahoning County Court of Common Pleas that imposed a sentence of eleven years subsequent to accepting Cain's guilty plea to one count of Aggravated Robbery, in violation of R.C. 2911.01(A)(1); with a firear
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997-07-03 · Published · cited 0× · 124 F.3d 188; 1997 WL 518271
124 F.3d 188 In re Slawek's Anchorage Associates, Ltd.v.James J. Cain, Paul P. Slawek, Susan C. Slawek NO. 97-5049 United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. July 03, 1997 Appeal From: D.N.J. ,No.96cv02258 , Rodriguez, J. 1</
Army Court of Criminal Appeals · 2002-10-21 · Published · cited 0× · 57 M.J. 733; 2002 CCA LEXIS 241; 2002 WL 31367434
OPINION OF THE COURT CURRIE, Senior Judge: A military judge, sitting as a general court-martial, convicted appellant, pursuant to his pleas, of indecent assault (two specifications), in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934 [hereinafter UCMJ]. Appellant was sentenced to a dishonorable discharge, confinement for five years, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and redu
Cain v. Johnsonpublic domain
Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000-07-25 · Published · cited 15× · 755 A.2d 156; 2000 R.I. LEXIS 173; 2000 WL 1022330
FLANDERS, Justice, concurring. I join in the Court’s opinion, but write separately to make the following points and observations: (1) Although the defendants all knew that the Cliff Walk area in front of Salve Regina University posed certain dangers to users because of soil-erosion problems and the lack of fencing around the cliffs and that these dangers had figured in two deaths and ot
In Re Cainpublic domain
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991-04-29 · Published · cited 84× · 590 A.2d 291; 527 Pa. 260; 1991 Pa. LEXIS 98
527 Pa. 260 (1991) 590 A.2d 291 In re Former Judge Herbert R. CAIN, Jr., Court of Common Pleas Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Argued October 23, 1990. Decided April 29, 1991. *261 Morris Paul Baran, Jenkintown, for respondent. Robert Keuch, Executive Director, Harrisburg, for J.I
Kentucky Supreme Court · 2007-11-21 · Published · cited 53× · 236 S.W.3d 579; 2007 WL 2404448
236 S.W.3d 579 (2007) GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Appellant, v. Dennis CAIN, as Executor of the Estate of Daniel Cain; Mary Helen Cain; John T. Cain; Becky Cain; Vincent J. Becker; and Kathleen Becker, Appellees. and Debbie Ellen Rehm, Individually and as Executrix of the Estate of James David Rehm; Nicholas James Rehm, by and Through their Parent, Guardian and Next Friend, Debbie Ellen Rehm; and Christina Marie Rehm, by and Through Their Paren
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2020-05-04 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE JOHN J. CAIN, JR., JANE L. CAIN, ) DAVID PAPE, MELISSA PAPE, ) CHARLES MOORE, SR., JOHN ) DILLON, MARY E. GRANGER, ) JOSEPH W. AYRES, PAUL BRASURE, ) NELLIE BRASURE, JULIE A. ) CUMMINGS, CAROL BUCHLER, ) GARY C. MEIKLEJOHN, ANNA G. ) MEIKLEJOHN, JOHN L. ) MEIKLEJOHN, RICK EVANS, ) ROBERT C. ACKERS
Blain v. Cainpublic domain
Oregon Supreme Court · 2024-02-01 · Published · cited 8× · 543 P.3d 1238; 372 Or. 22
22 February 1, 2024 No. 2 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON PAUL ALLEN BLAIN, Petitioner on Review, v. Brad CAIN, Superintendent, Snake River Correctional Institution, Respondent on Review. (CC 19CV43702) (CA A175317) (SC S070528) En Banc On petiti
Blain v. Cainpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2023-08-23 · Published · cited 14× · 327 Or. App. 584; 536 P.3d 623
584 Submitted February 24, affirmed August 23, 2023 PAUL ALLEN BLAIN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Brad CAIN, Superintendent, Snake River Correctional Institution, Defendant-Respondent. Malheur County Circuit Court 19CV43702
District Court, D. Oregon · 1995-02-28 · Published · cited 0× · 891 F. Supp. 542; 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9755; 1995 WL 399102
OPINION AND ORDER ROBERT E. JONES, District Judge: The court has received defendant’s motion to vacate his sentence and dismiss his criminal conviction on the grounds of double jeopardy. After considering the materials submitted by defendant I conclude that the motion must be denied. This court has recently ruled that jeopardy attaches in a civil forfeiture action when final
Cain v. Super. Ct.public domain
California Court of Appeal · 2025-04-11 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 4/11/25 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR FRED MARION CAIN III, Petitioner, A170052 v. SUPERIOR COURT OF (Solano County Super. Ct. CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF No. F23-01357) SOLANO, Respondent; THE PEOPLE
Crawford v. Cainpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2023-05-19 · Published · cited 3× · 68 F.4th 273
Case: 20-61019 Document: 00516757458 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/19/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED
In re M.J.B.public domain
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2004-04-08 · Published · cited 732× · 140 S.W.3d 643; 2004 Tenn. App. LEXIS 213
WILLIAM B. CAIN, J., concurring. I concur in the judgment that clear and convincing evidence establishes abundant grounds for the termination of the parental rights of the mother in this case and further establishes that it is in the best interests of the children to terminate her parental rights. I continue, however, to adhere to my view that a preponderance of the evidence standard on
Michigan Supreme Court · 1996-05-21 · Published · cited 222× · 548 N.W.2d 210; 451 Mich. 470
Brickley, C.J. (concurring). While I agree with the majority’s conclusion that Judge Giddings should not *519be disqualified from hearing the underlying suit, I write separately because the conflict between the majority and the dissent over whether the Governor is a “party” to this suit threatens to overwhelm thoughtful r
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024-10-08 · Published · cited 0× · 2024 NY Slip Op 04899
Cain v 42 W. 65th LLC (2024 NY Slip Op 04899) Cain v 42 W. 65th LLC 2024 NY Slip Op 04899 Decided on October 08, 2024 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth) · 2023-11-09 · Published · cited 0×
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-23-00157-CV ___________________________ RODNEY LARSON, Appellant V. WILLIAM CAIN, Appellee On Appeal from the 48th District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 048-308849-19 Before Sudderth, C.J.; Kerr and Walker, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Kerr