Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Paul J. Cain”
Cain v. Aragonpublic domain
*518ORDER AND JUDGMENT** PAUL KELLY, JR., Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-Appellant Paul Cain appeals from the district court’s sua sponte dismissal of his civil rights complaint filed on his behalf and on behalf of sixteen prisoners incarcerated in Otero County Prison Facility in Chaparral, New Mexico. Citizens of New Mexico
Cain v. Midland Funding, LLCpublic domain
Dissenting Opinion by Getty, J., which Harrell, J., joins. I respectfully dissent from the Majority’s conclusion that Midland waived its right to arbitrate the current class action *164lawsuit by filing a collection action against Mr. Cain in 2009. Even if Midland had the option, und
Cain v. Burghoff (Burghoff)public domain
374 B.R. 672 (2007) Theodore Blair BURGHOFF, Debtor. Michael Cain and Charlotte Cain, Plaintiffs, v. Theodore B. Burghoff, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 05-10947, Adversary No. 05-30210. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Iowa. May 21, 2007. *673 *674 *675
Cain v. Angelonepublic domain
PER CURIAM: Robin L. Cain seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on her petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2002). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Cain v. Angelone, No. CA-01-398-7 (W.D.Va. M
State v. Cain, 08 Ma 123 (3-3-2009)public domain
OPINION {¶ 1} This timely appeal comes for consideration upon the record in the trial court and the parties' briefs. Appellant, Lance C. Cain, appeals the June 9, 2008 decision of the Mahoning County Court of Common Pleas that imposed a sentence of eleven years subsequent to accepting Cain's guilty plea to one count of Aggravated Robbery, in violation of R.C. 2911.01(A)(1); with a firear
In Re Slawek's Anchorage Associates, Ltd. v. James J. Cain, Paul P. Slawek, Susan C. Slawekpublic domain
124 F.3d 188 In re Slawek's Anchorage Associates, Ltd.v.James J. Cain, Paul P. Slawek, Susan C. Slawek NO. 97-5049 United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. July 03, 1997 Appeal From: D.N.J. ,No.96cv02258 , Rodriguez, J. 1</
United States v. Cainpublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT CURRIE, Senior Judge: A military judge, sitting as a general court-martial, convicted appellant, pursuant to his pleas, of indecent assault (two specifications), in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934 [hereinafter UCMJ]. Appellant was sentenced to a dishonorable discharge, confinement for five years, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and redu
Cain v. Johnsonpublic domain
FLANDERS, Justice, concurring. I join in the Court’s opinion, but write separately to make the following points and observations: (1) Although the defendants all knew that the Cliff Walk area in front of Salve Regina University posed certain dangers to users because of soil-erosion problems and the lack of fencing around the cliffs and that these dangers had figured in two deaths and ot
In Re Cainpublic domain
527 Pa. 260 (1991) 590 A.2d 291 In re Former Judge Herbert R. CAIN, Jr., Court of Common Pleas Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Argued October 23, 1990. Decided April 29, 1991. *261 Morris Paul Baran, Jenkintown, for respondent. Robert Keuch, Executive Director, Harrisburg, for J.I
General Electric Co. v. Cainpublic domain
236 S.W.3d 579 (2007) GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Appellant, v. Dennis CAIN, as Executor of the Estate of Daniel Cain; Mary Helen Cain; John T. Cain; Becky Cain; Vincent J. Becker; and Kathleen Becker, Appellees. and Debbie Ellen Rehm, Individually and as Executrix of the Estate of James David Rehm; Nicholas James Rehm, by and Through their Parent, Guardian and Next Friend, Debbie Ellen Rehm; and Christina Marie Rehm, by and Through Their Paren
John J. Cain, Jr. v. Sussex County Councilpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE JOHN J. CAIN, JR., JANE L. CAIN, ) DAVID PAPE, MELISSA PAPE, ) CHARLES MOORE, SR., JOHN ) DILLON, MARY E. GRANGER, ) JOSEPH W. AYRES, PAUL BRASURE, ) NELLIE BRASURE, JULIE A. ) CUMMINGS, CAROL BUCHLER, ) GARY C. MEIKLEJOHN, ANNA G. ) MEIKLEJOHN, JOHN L. ) MEIKLEJOHN, RICK EVANS, ) ROBERT C. ACKERS
Blain v. Cainpublic domain
22 February 1, 2024 No. 2 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON PAUL ALLEN BLAIN, Petitioner on Review, v. Brad CAIN, Superintendent, Snake River Correctional Institution, Respondent on Review. (CC 19CV43702) (CA A175317) (SC S070528) En Banc On petiti
Blain v. Cainpublic domain
584 Submitted February 24, affirmed August 23, 2023 PAUL ALLEN BLAIN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Brad CAIN, Superintendent, Snake River Correctional Institution, Defendant-Respondent. Malheur County Circuit Court 19CV43702
United States v. Cainpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER ROBERT E. JONES, District Judge: The court has received defendant’s motion to vacate his sentence and dismiss his criminal conviction on the grounds of double jeopardy. After considering the materials submitted by defendant I conclude that the motion must be denied. This court has recently ruled that jeopardy attaches in a civil forfeiture action when final
Cain v. Super. Ct.public domain
Filed 4/11/25 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR FRED MARION CAIN III, Petitioner, A170052 v. SUPERIOR COURT OF (Solano County Super. Ct. CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF No. F23-01357) SOLANO, Respondent; THE PEOPLE
Crawford v. Cainpublic domain
Case: 20-61019 Document: 00516757458 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/19/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED
In re M.J.B.public domain
WILLIAM B. CAIN, J., concurring. I concur in the judgment that clear and convincing evidence establishes abundant grounds for the termination of the parental rights of the mother in this case and further establishes that it is in the best interests of the children to terminate her parental rights. I continue, however, to adhere to my view that a preponderance of the evidence standard on
Cain v Department of Correctionspublic domain
Brickley, C.J. (concurring). While I agree with the majority’s conclusion that Judge Giddings should not *519be disqualified from hearing the underlying suit, I write separately because the conflict between the majority and the dissent over whether the Governor is a “party” to this suit threatens to overwhelm thoughtful r
Cain v. 42 W. 65th LLCpublic domain
Cain v 42 W. 65th LLC (2024 NY Slip Op 04899) Cain v 42 W. 65th LLC 2024 NY Slip Op 04899 Decided on October 08, 2024 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
Rodney Larson v. William Cainpublic domain
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-23-00157-CV ___________________________ RODNEY LARSON, Appellant V. WILLIAM CAIN, Appellee On Appeal from the 48th District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 048-308849-19 Before Sudderth, C.J.; Kerr and Walker, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Kerr