Cases

364 N.W.2d 494 (1985) STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Jerry Allan JOHNSEN, Appellant. No. C2-84-1434. Court of Appeals of Minnesota. March 19, 1985. Review Denied May 20, 1985. *495 Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., Thomas J. Johnson, Hennepin County Atty., J. Michael Richardson, Minneapolis, for respondent

247 N.W.2d 638 (1976) 197 Neb. 216 STATE of Nebraska, Appellee, v. Paul John JOHNSEN, Appellant. No. 40772. Supreme Court of Nebraska. December 15, 1976. *639 Walter J. Matejka, William E. Pfeiffer, Omaha, for appellant. Paul L. Douglas, Atty. Gen., Harold I. Mosher, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lincoln, for a

IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION ONE BRIONNA J., Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SAFETY, A.V., Appellees. No. 1 CA-JV 19-0017 FILED 7-9-2019 Appeal from the Superior Court in Maricopa County No. JD530462 The Honorable

247 P.3d 1011 (2011) Paul TURNER, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. CITY OF FLAGSTAFF, Defendant/Appellee. No. 1 CA-CV 10-0172. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department B. February 22, 2011. As Corrected March 3, 2011. *1012 Pacific Legal Foundation By James S. Burling, Timothy Sandefur, pro hac vice, Joshua P.

IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION ONE JUDSON C. BALL REVOCABLE TRUST, Plaintiff/Counter- Defendant/Appellant, v. PHOENIX ORCHARD GROUP I, L.P., et al., Defendants/Counter-Claimants/ Intervenors/Appellees. No. 1 CA-CV 17-0642 FILED 10-2-2018 Appeal from th

258 P.3d 208 (2011) STATE of Arizona, Appellee, v. David Paul STOCKS, Appellant. No. 1 CA-CR 09-0870. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department B. June 9, 2011. *210 Thomas C. Horne, Attorney General by Kent E. Cattani, Chief Counsel, Criminal Appeals Section and Kelly J. Morrissey, Assistant Attorney General, Phoenix,

263 P.3d 66 (2011) BURLINGAME INDUSTRIES, INC., a corporation dba Eagle Roofing Products-Southwest, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. MARICOPA COUNTY, Defendant/Appellee. No. 1 CA-TX 10-0003. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department T. August 23, 2011. Mooney, Wright & Moore, PLLC by Paul J. Mooney and Jim L. Wright, Mesa, Attorneys for Plaintiff/Appellant.

OPINION THOMPSON, Judge. ¶ 1 This special action arises out of the trial court’s order holding petitioner (Brewer) without bail on new charges. For the reasons that follow, we accept jurisdiction and deny the relief requested by petitioner. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND ¶ 2 In February 2010, Brewer appeared for an initial appearance on allegations that he comm

235 P.3d 259 (2010) SEMPRE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, an Arizona limited partnership, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MARICOPA COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Arizona, Defendant-Appellee. No. 1 CA-TX 08-0008. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department T. June 22, 2010. *260 Mooney Wright & Moore PLLC By Paul J. Moo

262 P.3d 238 (2011) STATE of Arizona ex rel. William G. MONTGOMERY, Maricopa County Attorney, Petitioner, v. The Honorable Christopher WHITTEN, Judge of the Superior Court of the State of Arizona, in and for the County of Maricopa, Respondent Judge, Ricky Brett Keahy Martinez and District Medical Group, Real Parties in Interest. No. 1 CA-SA 11-0127. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Departme

249 P.3d 1116 (2011) STATE of Arizona, Appellee, v. William Paul RUSSELL, Appellant. No. 1 CA-CR 10-0376. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department B. April 5, 2011. *1117 Thomas C. Horne, Arizona Attorney General By Kent E. Cattani, Chief Counsel, Criminal Appeals/Capital Litigation Section and Aaron J. Moskowitz, Assi

Cole, Judge: We introduce this opinion with the following statement of facts, stipulated at the trial between counsel for the respective parties: That the merchandise is stockfish reliquidated at 2)4 cents per pound under Paragraph 717 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, under the principle of the decision in the case of B. R. Anderson & Company v. United States, C. D. 740, decided February 25, 1943.

187 P.3d 530 (2008) EUROFRESH, INC., a Delaware corporation, fka Bonita Nurseries, Inc., a corporation, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. GRAHAM COUNTY, Defendant/Appellant. No. 1 CA-TX 06-0002. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department T. October 25, 2007. Reconsideration Denied January 11, 2008. Review Denied June 3, 2008.

408 N.W.2d 919 (1987) ARNOLD JOHNSEN DECORATORS, INC. and Arnold Johnsen, individually, Appellant, v. HOLMBECK AND ASSOCIATES, INC., West Bend Mutual Insurance Company, Respondents. No. C4-86-2220. Court of Appeals of Minnesota. July 14, 1987. Review Denied September 23, 1987. James E. Speckmann, St. Paul, for Arnold Johnsen Decorators, Inc. and Arn

E. GRADY JOLLY, Circuit Judge: This dispute arises between two companies in the secondary market for structured settlement payments: Peachtree and Rapid. 1 These two companies are in the business of identifying individuals who are the beneficiaries of structured settlements, which provide a stream of payments, much like

JOHNSEN, Circuit Judge. The suit is one against a corporation, its officers and directors, to recover under North Dakota law the purchase price paid by plaintiff for some shares of stock in the corporation. Three purchases of stock are involved, made in the years 1945 and 1946. The suit was instituted in 1957. The trial court, on mo

JOHNSEN, Senior Circuit Judge (dissenting). I had hoped that ruling on the petitions for rehearing would have been deferred until after the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit had rendered its decision in the in banc hearing which it has granted of the case of United States v. Pacente, No. 72-1988. Argument in the in banc hearing has been set for Ap

Armstrong, C.J. John and Margaret Kaech sued the Lewis County Public Utility District, No. 1 (PUD), claiming “stray voltage” harmed their dairy cows. The jury awarded Kaech $1,089,000. The PUD filed a notice of appeal and also moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (NOV) and for a new trial. The trial court denied the motion for judgment NOV but granted the motion for a new trial, ruling that the evidence did not support

175 P.3d 700 (2008) SOUTHWEST AIRLINES CO., a Texas corporation, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, an agency of the State of Arizona; State of Arizona, Defendants/Appellees. No. 1 CA-TX 07-0002. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department T. January 29, 2008. Fennemore Craig, P.C. By Paul J. Mooney, Jim L. Wright, Deryck R. Lavelle, Phoe

Johanson, J. ¶1 The subject of this appeal is the Western Washington Growth Management Hearings Board’s (Board) final decision and order that upheld Jefferson County’s 2014 Shoreline Master Program. Olympic Stewardship Foundation (OSF), Citizens’ Alliance for Property Rights Jefferson County (CAPR) et al., and Hood Canal Sand and Gravel (S&G) appeal various aspects of the Board’s