Cases

112 B.R. 920 (1990) In the Matter of CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL AND PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Debtor, Adversary Proceeding: Phyllis Young and Ivan Young. No. 77 P 8999. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D. February 16, 1990. *921 Daniel R. Murray, Jenner & Block, Chicago, Ill. Edward G. Gower, Keck, Mahin &a;

227 S.W.3d 21 (2007) STATE of Tennessee v. Janet V. DYCH. Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee, at Knoxville. April 25, 2006 Session. October 27, 2006. Application for Permission to Appeal Denied February 26, 2007. *23 Charles I. Poole, Sevierville, Tennessee, for the appellant, Janet V. Dych. Paul G. Su

Tatel, Circuit Judge: *1121 Since 1789, the House of Representatives has begun each legislative day with a prayer, a practice the Supreme Court has found compatible with the Establishment Clause. See generally Marsh v. Chambers ,

703 F.Supp.2d 671 (2010) MAKER'S MARK DISTILLERY, INC., Plaintiff, v. DIAGEO NORTH AMERICA, INC., et. al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 3:03-CV-93-H. United States District Court, W.D. Kentucky, Louisville. April 2, 2010. *680 Edward T. Colbert, Erik C. Kane, William M. Merone, Kenyon & Kenyon LLP, Washington, DC, John David

Case: 22-40399 Document: 00516783843 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/12/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 12, 2023

677 F.Supp.2d 806 (2010) Roger WOODS, Plaintiff, v. ERA MED LLC, John Hustwit, Seacor Holdings Inc., John Does (heretofore unidentified individuals) and ABC Entities (heretofore unidentified corporations, partnerships, and/or other business entities), Defendants. Civil Action No. 2:08-cv-02495-WY. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. January 7, 2010.

*375The opinion of the court was delivered by Beier, J.: This is an original action in mandamus filed by petitioner Comprehensive Health of Planned Parenthood of Kansas and Mid-Missouri, Inc. (CHPP), to challenge respondent Phill Kline’s handling of patient records obtained from CHPP pursuant to an inquisition subpoena issued when Kline was Attorney Gene

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT VIRGINIA DUNCAN; PATRICK No. 23-55805 LOVETTE; DAVID MARGUGLIO; CHRISTOPHER WADDELL; D.C. No. CALIFORNIA RIFLE & PISTOL 3:17-cv-01017- ASSOCIATION, INC., a California BEN-JLB corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees, OPINION v. ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California,

7/16/2021 10:41:51 AM Compare Results Old File: New File: 19-123.pdf 19-123_new.pdf versus 110 pages (538 KB) 110 pages (605

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2020 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

7/8/2021 2:30:57 PM Compare Results Old File: New File: 19-123.pdf 19-123_new.pdf versus 110 pages (538 KB) 110 pages (606 KB)

8/17/2021 5:07:01 PM Compare Results Old File: New File: 19-123.pdf 19-123_new.pdf versus 110 pages (538 KB) 110 pages (604 KB)

Mr. Justice Craig delivered the opinion of the Court: This was a bill brought by John Evans Cornell against George Newkirk and others, to set aside a mortgage sale of certain lots in Cornell, Cook county, described in the bill, and to redeem the premises from a mortgage. The defendants answered the bill, and replications having been filed to the answers, the cause proceeded t

Mr. Justice Brennan delivered the opinion of the Court. This case presents important questions touching the federal habeas corpus jurisdiction, 28 U. S. C. §§ 2241 et seq., in its relation to state criminal justice. The narrow question is whether the respondent Noia may be granted federal habeas corpus relief from imprisonment under a New York conviction now admitted by the State to rest upon a confe

This suit was brought by the plaintiff in error, A. A. Winfrey, against the defendant in error, the Girard Fire and Marine Insurance Company, to recover on a fire insurance policy covering certain household furniture. The case was tried without a jury, and judgment was rendered for Winfrey for the amount of the policy with interest. The Court of Civil Appeals reversed that judgment and rendered judgment for the insurance *Page 439 company.

ACCEPTED 07-14-00405-CV SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS AMARILLO, TEXAS 2/18/2015 4:43:44 PM