Cases

COURT OF APPEALS COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS PAUL D. SMITH, )

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-21-00615-CV Sarah Louise Smith and Javan Paul Smith, Appellants v. Richard D. Powell, Appellee FROM THE 33RD DISTRICT COURT OF LLANO COUNTY NO. 21376, THE HONORABLE EVAN C. STUBBS, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN JUDGMENT RENDERED NOVEMBER 18, 2022 NO. 03-21-00615-CV Sarah Louise Smith and Javan Paul Smith, Appellants v. Richard D. Powell, Appellee APPEAL FROM 33RD DISTRICT COURT OF LLANO COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES TRIANA AND SMITH DI

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS § GARY D. SMITH, No. 08-18-00162-CV § APPELLANT, Appeal from the § V.

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS § GARY D. SMITH, No. 08-18-00162-CV § APPELLANT, Appeal from the § V.

NOONAN, Circuit Judge: G. Michael Kirchoff, Jerry D. Smith, and Paul D. Smith appeal their convictions of various crimes in connection with the defrauding of Queen City Savings and Loan Association (the Savings and Loan). We affirm the conviction of all three defendants. PROCEEDINGS 1. The Indictment

906 F.2d 385 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Jerry D. SMITH, Paul D. Smith, and G. Michael Kirchoff,Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 88-3168, 88-3185 and 88-3189. United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 26, 1989.Opinion Filed Dec. 4, 1989.Order Filed July 10, 1990.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE August 8, 2008 Session ERVIN D. SMITH, ET AL. v. PAUL EVANS, ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Montgomery County No. MC-CH-CV-MG-07-1 Laurence M. McMillan, Jr., Judge No. M2007-02855-COA-R3-CV - Filed August 27, 2008 Owners of property brought suit to terminate an ingress/egress eas

Rose, J. *1084The mother appeals, contending that, despite the father’s injuries and disability, the motion for a downward modification should have been denied because the father could provide support through some other type of veterinary practice. She did not, however, present any evidence contradicting the father’s proof of his limited ability to work or supporting h

ACCEPTED 03-14-00698-CV 6235663 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

ACCEPTED 03-14-00698-CV 7493195 THIRD COURT

ACCEPTED 03-14-00698-CV 7490749 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

ACCEPTED 03-14-00698-CV 6648058 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

ACCEPTED 03-14-00698-CV 3979970 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

ACCEPTED 03-14-00698-CV 5779003 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

ACCEPTED 03-14-00698-CV 5989419 THIRD COURT OF APPEAL

ACCEPTED 03-14-00698-CV 4437659 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

ACCEPTED 03-14-00698-CV 3600209 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

ACCEPTED 03-14-00698-CV 5152671 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

ACCEPTED 03-14-00698-CV 4771671 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS