Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Paul Brian Staples v. General Electric Co.”
206 P.3d 919 (2009) 2009 MT 123 350 Mont. 184 REVELATION INDUSTRIES, INC., formerly known as Revelation Engineering, Inc., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. ST. PAUL FIRE & MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant and Appellee. No. DA 07-0752. Supreme Court of Montana. Argued and Submitted January 14, 2009. Decided April
Orange Co. Water Dist. v. Sabic Innovative Plasticspublic domain
Filed 8/25/17 (unmodified opinion attached) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT, D070553 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. 30-2008-00078246) v.
Orange Co. Water Dist. v. Sabic Innovative Plasticspublic domain
Filed 8/4/17 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT, D070553 Plaintiff and Appellant, v. (Super. Ct. No. 30-2008-00078246) SABIC INNOVATIVE PLASTICS US, LLC, et al., Defendants and Respondents.
Standard Mutual Insurance Co. v. Laypublic domain
ILLINOIS OFFICIAL REPORTS Supreme Court Standard Mutual Insurance Co. v. Lay, 2013 IL 114617 Caption in Supreme STANDARD MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee, v. Court: NORMA LAY, Indiv. and as Ex’r of the Estate of Theodore W. Lay, d/b/a Ted Lay Real Estate Agency, et al., Appellants. Docket No. 114617 Filed
Dow Chemical Co. v. Mee Industriespublic domain
264 F.Supp.2d 1018 (2003) DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. MEE INDUSTRIES, a California corporation; and, Florida Power Corporation, a Florida corporation, Defendants. No. 6:00CV437-ORL-31DAB. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division. September 19, 2002. *1020 Michael R. Levin, Baker & Hostetler, LLP, O
ACCEPTED 03-14-00197-CV 4929353 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEX
Alaska Elec. Pension Fund v. Bank of Am. Corp.public domain
JESSE M. FURMAN, United States District Judge *615In this putative class action, familiarity with which is presumed, Plaintiffs-several *616institutional investors-allege that Defendants, some of the world's largest banks, illegally manipulated the U.S. Dollar ISDAfix ("ISDAfix"),
Judgment rendered September 23, 2020. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, La. C.C.P. No. 53,565-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA ***** KENNETH LAWRENCE Plai
Pagliaroni v. Mastic Home Exteriors, Inc.public domain
Denise J. Casper, United States District Judge *280I. Introduction Anthony Pagliaroni ("Pagliaroni"), Vicki O'Brien ("O'Brien"), Catherine Lynch ("Lynch") and John Costello ("Costello") (collectively, "Plaintiffs") seek damages as well as declaratory and injunctive relief from Defendants Mastic Home Exteriors ("Mastic") and Dec
SD3, LLC v. Black & Decker (U.S.) Inc.public domain
WILKINSON, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part: The majority’s view of modern commerce is unfortunate. It takes an isolationist approach in which each business must all but lock itself in semi-solitary or risk the taint of antitrust claims. Whatever validity the isolationist approach may once have had, it is profoundly injurious in an increasingly interconne
Norman v. Rosspublic domain
Filed 4/23/24 CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION * IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR HAYLEY MARIE NORMAN, B316971 consolidated with B326626 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County v. Super. Ct. No. 20STCV35711)
Toth v. California University of Pennsylvaniapublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION NORA BARRY FISCHER, District Judge. I. Introduction This matter comes before the Court on cross-motions for summary judgment filed by the parties pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. Docket Nos. 47 & 49. For the reasons that follow, the Plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment (Docket No. 47) will be denied, and the Defendants’ mo
United States v. HealthSpring, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM KEVIN H. SHARP, District Judge. This qui tam action brought by Relator Marc Osheroff attacks certain inducements offered by medical clinics to Medicare beneficiaries in the Miami area. Defendants HealthSpring, Inc., HealthSpring of Florida, Inc., Leon Medical Centers, Inc., and Benjamin Leon, Jr., have filed Motions to Dismiss (Docket Nos. 56 & 57). Those Motions have be
Duffey v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp.public domain
OPINION AND ORDER J. PAUL OETKEN, District Judge: This is a case about the sale of merchandise relating to the movie Office Space, a 1999 cult classic about the soul-crushing experience of working under incompetent management. The merchandise at issue is the Office Space “Box of Flair,” a product that was sold to consumers beginning in 2007. “Flair” refers to buttons that wait
Canon Inc. v. GCC International Ltd.public domain
450 F.Supp.2d 243 (2006) CANON INC., Plaintiff, v. GCC INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, GCC Management Limited, Gatehill International Limited, Q-Imaging (USA) Inc., and Tallygenicom LP, Defendants. No. 06 Civ. 3324(PKC). United States District Court, S.D. New York. August 29, 2006. *244 *245
Uni-Sys., LLC v. U.S. Tennis Ass'n, Inc.public domain
KIYO A. MATSUMOTO, United States District Judge *153Plaintiff Uni-Systems, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company ("Uni-Systems") commenced this action on January 11, 2017 against defendants United States Tennis Association, Inc., a not-for-profit incorporated in New York ("USTA"); Rossetti Inc., a Michigan Corporation, ("Rossetti"); Hunt Construction Group, Inc., a
Rodden v. Jefferson Pilot Financial Insurancepublic domain
(2008) Lois RODDEN, Plaintiff, v. JEFFERSON PILOT FINANCIAL INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Defendants. No. C 07-6489 SI. United States District Court, N.D. California. December 30, 2008. ORDER RE: PARTIES' CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT SUSAN ILLSTON, District Judge. On December 12, 2008, the Court heard argument on the parties' cross-motions
Ultratec, Inc. v. Sorenson Communications, Inc.public domain
OPINION AND ORDER BARBARA B. CRABB, District Judge. In this civil action, plaintiffs Ultratec, Inc. and CapTel, Inc., contend that defendants Sorenson Communications, Inc. and CaptionCall, LLC have infringed the following eight patents related to a telephone relay system between deaf and hearing users: United States Patents Nos. 5,909,-482, 6,233,314, 6,594,346, 6,603,835, 7,319,-
Advanceme Inc. v. RAPIDPAY, LLCpublic domain
509 F.Supp.2d 593 (2007) ADVANCEME INC., Plaintiff v. RAPIDPAY, LLC, et al., Defendant. No. 6:05 CV 424. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Tyler Division. August 14, 2007. *594 *595 *596 *597
HALLER, J. *354The Orange County Water District (District) was created by the California Legislature to protect and manage groundwater supplies within its territory, which covers most of Orange County, California. The District and other regulatory agencies have long been aware of localized groundwater contamination caused by hazardous substan