Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Paul Allen Byerly”
Sepulveda v. Allen Family Foods, Inc.public domain
591 F.3d 209 (2009) Sanjuanita SEPULVEDA; Angela Salinas; Jose Sanchez Rivera, individually and on behalf of all similarly situated; David Bailey; Sean Bradham; Clara Bennett; Victor Burgos Rivera; Vence Byrd; Hada Cardenas; Angel Colmenares; Yachira Davila; Hector Esmurria; Garvina Gibbs; Margaret Gibbs; Roger Gonzales; Patricia Gutierrez; Selena Hancock; Cesar Hernandez; Pattie Hinton; William Jackson; Thomas Jacobs; Robin Lott; Maricruz Luyando; Maria
Allen v. Statepublic domain
43 P.3d 551 (2002) 2002 WY 48 Jay C. ALLEN, Appellant (Defendant), v. The STATE of Wyoming, Appellee (Plaintiff). No. 00-192. Supreme Court of Wyoming. April 2, 2002. *554 Sylvia L. Hackl, State Public Defender; Donna D. Domonkos, Appellate Counsel; and Tina N. Kerin, Assistant Appellate Counsel, Represent
Western Energy Corporation v. Staufferpublic domain
Filed 1/15/19 by Clerk of Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2019 ND 26 Western Energy Corporation, Plaintiff and Appellant v. Cynthia J. Stauffer; Kenneth Stauffer; Kari Sue Stauffer; Kenneth Stauffer, Trustee of The Stauffer Grandchildren’s Trust dated April 20, 2012; William Stauffer (deceased); Ethel Stauffer (deceased); Linda Myer;
Western Energy Corporation v. Staufferpublic domain
Filed 1/15/19 by Clerk of Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2019 ND 26 Western Energy Corporation, Plaintiff and Appellant v. Cynthia J. Stauffer; Kenneth Stauffer; Kari Sue Stauffer; Kenneth Stauffer, Trustee of The Stauffer Grandchildren’s Trust dated April 20, 2012; William Stauffer (deceased); Ethel Stauffer (deceased); Linda Myer;
United States v. Hunter Loospublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 23a0089p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, │ Plaintiff-Ap
United States v. Warnagirispublic domain
Appendix A Department of Justice Chart Documenting Sentences in Capitol Breach Cases Monday, January 6, 2025 SENTENCES IMPOSED IN CASES ARISING OUT OF THE EVENTS OF JANUARY 6, 2021 Disclaimer: Those relying on information contained in this document should verify all information for accuracy Table 1: Cases in which the government recommended a probation sentence without home detention 1 0F Defendant Ca
NOTICE: The attorneys on the attached list have the opportunity to comply with outstanding requirements prior to the effective date of the Supreme Court Order and not be administratively suspended. DATE: 07/16/2024 PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION PAGE: 1 TIME: 15:10:52 NON-COMPLIANT LAWYERS USER ID: jilgenfr ACTIVE
Livingston v. Town of Mt. Pleasantpublic domain
GOOLSBY, J. This appeal concerns whether a parcel of property owned by Mary Livingston is subject to a special assessment that was imposed by the Town of Mt. Pleasant to fund the widening and improvement of Patriots Point Boulevard. The assess*356ment was adopted pursuant to the Municipal Improvement Act of 1999.1 The circuit court upheld
Bowers v. City of High Pointpublic domain
451 S.E.2d 284 (1994) James A. BOWERS, Jr., James A. Branson, Benjamin Brockman, Vaughn W. Crabb, Billy R. Gant, Henry L. Jones, Lyman F. Lance, Jr., Jerry T. Rich, Lindsay P. Royal, David F. Thompson, Paul D. Wood, Jr., and Morris J. Yandle, v. CITY OF HIGH POINT. No. 316PA93. Supreme Court of North Carolina. December 30, 1994. *286
State v. Alaska Public Employees Ass'npublic domain
OPINION MATTHEWS, Justice. The Commissioner of the Department of Health and Social Services has propounded a Firearms Policy concerning the carrying of concealed firearms by Probation-Parole officers, which restricts the carrying of firearms to very limited circumstances. The Appellees, seventeen probation-parole officers and their employee association challenged this policy in the Superior Court. The court
United States v. Jack Groenendalpublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 09a0070p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X Plaintiff-Appellee, - UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Berry v. McLeodpublic domain
328 S.C. 435 (1997) 492 S.E.2d 794 Eldon M. BERRY, Freddie D. Johnson, Betty Temple, William Coppage, II, Patsy V. Coppage, Sammie King, A.L. Kirkland, Charles H. Cash, C.A. Armstrong, Jr., Norman Strader, Bryon Turner, Henry Rowland, Lillian S. Hammack, Durand G. Coates, J.D. Southerland, W.E. Crawford, and B. Jack Walker Appellants, v. Daniel R. McLEOD, Jr., The McNair Law Firm, John W. Harte, and George Cantelou, Respon
417 F.Supp.2d 1309 (2006) CLARENDON AMERICA INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. MIAMI RIVER CLUB, INC., d/b/a Centro Espanol, Abdon Grau, Jose Perdomo, Personal Representative of the Estate of Florentino Perdomo, Defendants. No. 04-23184 CIV. United States District Court, S.D. Florida. January 13, 2006. *1310
Opinion by Judge Blatt, Samuel J. Lansberry, Inc. (protestan!) appeals an order of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission *383(PUC) granting the intervenor, Pañi E. Davidson (applicant) a certificate of public convenience. The certificate granted, inter alia, authority for the applicant to transport coal from points in Clearfield and Centr
City of Dallas, Texas v. Arredondo, Anthonypublic domain
Affirm in part; Reverse and Render in part; Remand and Opinion Filed August 13, 2013 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas __________________________________ NO. 05-12-00963-CV CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS, Appellant V. ANTHONY ARREDONDO, CHARLES S. SWANER, JAM
City of Dallas, Texas v. Willis, Kevin Michaelpublic domain
Affirm in part; Reverse and Render in part; Remand and Opinion Filed August 13, 2013 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas __________________________________ NO. 05-12-00963-CV CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS, Appellant V. ANTHONY ARREDONDO, CHARLES S. SWANER, JAM
Harlow v. Statepublic domain
70 P.3d 179 (2003) 2003 WY 47 James Martin HARLOW, Appellant (Defendant), v. The STATE Of Wyoming, Appellee (Plaintiff). James Martin Harlow, Appellant (Defendant), v. The State Of Wyoming, Appellee (Plaintiff). James Martin Harlow, Appellant (Defendant), v. The State Of Wyoming, Appellee (Plaintiff). Nos. 99-58, 99-59, 99-60. Supreme Court of Wyoming.
First General Realty Corp. v. Maryland Casualty Co.public domain
981 S.W.2d 495 (1998) FIRST GENERAL REALTY CORPORATION, et al., Appellants, v. MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, et al., Appellees. No. 03-97-00580-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Austin. November 30, 1998. *496 Ronald D. Wren, Bedford, for Appellants. Barry Bishop, Clark, Thomas & Winters, Austin, for Appellees. Before
Mathews v. St. Paul & Sioux City Railroadpublic domain
By the Court. Ripley, Ch. J. The defendant on the first ' of August, 1870, on the plaintiff’s land, with its engine and cars ran against and injured a cow belonging to the plaintiff. *440The defendant constructed its road through said land in 1869, and thereafter daily (Sundays excepted) has run its trains over the same, without paying or securing
Tolson v. Hodgepublic domain
WINTER, Circuit Judge: These appeals present a variety of issues requiring an accommodation between the provisions of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the state law of North Carolina which, by virtue of several of the rules, is made applicable to proceedings in the federal courts. A subsidiary question is the correctness of the entry of a judgment by default against plaintiff on defendant’s asserted counterclaim and