Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Patterson v. Scribner”
Garrick Harrington v. A. Scribnerpublic domain
*1302 OPINION McKEOWN, Circuit Judge: This case arises from a lockdown imposed on African American inmates at a California state prison after violent incidents involving inmates and guards. Garrick Harrington brought suit against prison officials under the Eighth Amendment for
Patterson v. Alltel Information Services, Inc.public domain
919 F.Supp. 500 (1996) Edward D. PATTERSON, Plaintiff, v. ALLTEL INFORMATION SERVICES, INC., Defendant. Civil No. 95-188-P-C. United States District Court, D. Maine. March 15, 1996. *501 Kate S. Debevoise, Bernstein, Shur, Sawyer & Nelson, Portland, Maine, for Plaintiff. William J. Kayatta Jr., Fall Ferguson, Pierce, A
Scribner v. Waffle House, Inc.public domain
976 F.Supp. 439 (1997) Therese SCRIBNER and Resource Recruiters, Inc. v. WAFFLE HOUSE, INC. No. 3:91-CV-2667-R. United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division. March 7, 1997. *440 *441 *442 Michael P. Metcalf, Law Office of Michael T. Metcalf, Da
Stanley Structures v. Scribnerpublic domain
JUSTICE HARRISON delivered the Opinion of the Court. Claimant, Chester Scribner (Scribner), appeals from a judgment of the Workers’ Compensation Court issued on September 16, 1991, which ruled in favor of the insurer (Aetna). The order entitled Aetna to recoup lump sum advances and social security overpayment by reducing Scribner’s weekly workers’ compensation be
Scribner v. Mack Trucks, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER HUYETT, District Judge. I. BACKGROUND Marvin and Sandra Scribner (“Plaintiffs”) commenced this personal injury action against Defendant Mack Trucks, Inc. (“Mack Trucks”). Plaintiffs allege that, when on *217Mack Trucks’ premises, Marvin Scribner slipped on oil which had been negligently s
Bouker Contracting Co. v. Scribnerpublic domain
Patterson, J.: This cause comes before us upon exceptions ordered, to be. heard in the first instance at the Appellate Division. Upon the trial a verdict was directed for the plaintiff, who sought to recover from *506the defendant the amount of an indebtedness represented by promissory .notes made by. the firm of Fogg & Scribner, of which the defendant was at one
Scribner v. Statepublic domain
The plaintiff in error, Dan Scribner, was convicted at the October, 1911, term of the district court of Seminole county on an indictment charging him with the murder of Zeke Putman, and his punishment fixed at imprisonment in the state penitentiary for life. The indictment alleges that the homicide occurred on or about the 16th day of January, 1909. The homicide occurred in the town of Allen, in Pontotoc county, and was a cold-blooded assassination. The deceased was shot while standing inside
Charles Scribner's Sons v. S.M.N. Marrspublic domain
Relator, Charles Scribner's Sons, a corporation, seeks a writ of *Page 18 mandamus against respondent to compel him to do the ministerial acts required of him under R.S., Arts. 2904-1/4i and 2909ii of the textbook law looking to the performance of its alleged contract with the State of Texas, entered into between it and the Texas State Textbook Commission, by the terms of which it had contracted and obligated itself to furnish and sell to the State of Tex
Equitable Trust Co. v. FINANCE COM'N OF TXpublic domain
99 S.W.3d 384 (2003) EQUITABLE TRUST COMPANY, Appellant, v. FINANCE COMMISSION OF TEXAS and Texas Department of Banking, Appellees. No. 03-01-00676-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Austin. February 21, 2003. *385 John L. Ray, San Antonio, for appellant. Sara Beth Scribner, Asst. Atty. Gen., Austin, for appellee. Befor
Carlos Castro v. Cal Terhunepublic domain
OPINION N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judge: Under the “void-for-vagueness” doctrine, due process requires enactments to be written with “sufficient definiteness that ordinary people can understand what conduct is prohibited and in a manner that does not encourage arbitrary and discriminatory enforcement.” Kolender v. Lawson, 461 U.S. 352, 3
Hawver v. Steelepublic domain
Hawver v Steele (2022 NY Slip Op 02322) Hawver v Steele 2022 NY Slip Op 02322 Decided on April 7, 2022 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
John M. Barham, Jr. v. Mississippi Power Companypublic domain
CHAMBERLIN, JUSTICE, DISSENTING: ¶24. The majority declares, Whether it be an entrepreneur developing a shopping mall, a religious organization erecting a church, a major manufacturer building a plant encompassing multiple acres, or a young couple constructing their dream home, every landowner is protected from the depletion and destruction of the surface of their land and buildings they
RSI Bank v. Providence Mut. Fire Ins. Co.public domain
JUSTICE PATTERSON delivered the opinion of the Court. **464When a criminal defendant is admitted into pretrial intervention (PTI), the court may impose on that defendant the obligation to pay restitution to the victim of his or her alleged offense as a condition of PTI. In accordance with the PTI program's rehabilitative goal, the PTI court hol
Dissenting Opinion Filed April 18, 2024 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-23-00128-CV WARREN KENNETH PAXTON, JR., APPELLANT V. COMMISSION FOR LAWYER DISCIPLINE, APPELLEE On Appeal from the 471st Judicial District Court Coll
AmBase Corp. v. United Statespublic domain
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT WARREN W. EGINTON, Senior District Judge. Plaintiff AmBase Corporation (“Am-Base”) has brought this action seeking a refund of Federal income tax for the tax year 1989. This refund would result from an increased net operating loss (“NOL”) deduction carried back to 1989 under 26 U.S.C. § 172 from AmBase’s income tax return
Domonic Malone v. Brian Williamspublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DOMONIC RONALDO MALONE, No. 22-16671 Petitioner-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:18-cv-01146- v. RFB-NJK BRIAN WILLIAMS, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE ORDER STATE OF NEVADA, Respondents-Appellants.
ONE-PIE INVESTMENTS, LLC v. Jacksonpublic domain
43 A.3d 911 (2012) ONE-PIE INVESTMENTS, LLC, Successful Third Party Bidder & Party in Interest Below-Appellant, v. Toni JACKSON, Defendant Below-Appellee. No. 623, 2011. Supreme Court of Delaware. Submitted: March 21, 2012. Decided: April 24, 2012. *912 Brian T. Murray, Esquire of Brian T. Murray, P.A., Newar
Steven Charles Landrum v. Statepublic domain
*637 OPINION DON H. REAVIS, Justice. A jury convicted appellant Steven Charles Landrum of theft and sentenced him to 15 years confinement. By one point of error, appellant contends the trial court erred in overruling his objection to the admission of business records v
Dalton v. Washington State Department of Correctionspublic domain
MEMORANDUM * William Dalton appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and pendent state law claims against his former employer, the Washington State Department of Corrections (“DOC”), and his former supervisors, Joseph Lehman (former Secretary of the DOC), Alice Payne (former Prison Superintendent), and Jane Robinson (former Health Care Manager). Dalton alleges
Michael Chess v. J. Doveypublic domain
*964 OPINION W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge: Appellant Michael Chess brought this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against eight members of the medical staff at California’s High Desert State Prison, alleging that they denied him constitutionally adequate medical care while he was incarcerat