Cases

IN THE NEBRASKA COURT OF APPEALS MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT ON APPEAL (Memorandum Web Opinion) PATTERSON V. PATTERSON NOTICE: THIS OPINION IS NOT DESIGNATED FOR PERMANENT PUBLICATION AND MAY NOT BE CITED EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY NEB. CT. R. APP. P. § 2-102(E). KAMI D. PATTERSON, APPELLANT, V.

PITMAN, J. Concerning the division of property after divorce between Plaintiff Melodye Patterson, nee Tanner, and Defendant Gary Edward Patterson, Plaintiff appeals the judgment of the trial court which declared their matrimonial agreement ("the Agreement") valid and which classified the shares of a company owned by Plaintiff prior to the marriage as community property. For the following reasons, we affirm the judgment of the trial

L.T. No.: 2014-DR-8043 Dismissed.

Affirmed.

McCULLOUGH, Judge. *114Timothy Craig Patterson ("defendant") appeals the denial of his motion for summary judgment. For the following reasons, we affirm. *115I. Background Cathy Suggs Patterson ("plaintiff") and de

Affirmed

*683Contrary to the father’s contention, a hearing is not necessary where, as here, the Family Court possesses adequate relevant information to enable it to make an informed and provident determination as to the subject child’s best interests (see Rosenberg v Rosenberg, 60 AD3d 658 [2009]; Matter of Vanjak v Pesa, 26 AD3d 512 [2006]; Assini v Assini, 11 AD3d 417, 418 [200

Sylvia S. Hendon, Presiding Judge. {¶ 1} This is an appeal from the trial court’s entry awarding attorney fees to plaintiff-appellee, Dawn Patterson, from her former spouse, defendant-appellant, Clifford Patterson. Because we hold that the trial court was permitted to award fees under R.C. 3105.73(B) in the absence of a specific requ

THOMPSON, Presiding Judge. Barbara Jean Patterson (“the wife”) appeals from a judgment of the St. Clair Circuit Court divorcing her from Raymond Lindsey Patterson (“the husband”) and dividing the parties’ marital estate. For the reasons stated herein, we reverse the trial court’s judgment and remand the cause for the entry of a new judgment. The parties married in 1989. One child was born of the marriage; sh

Justice PARRISH, opinion of the Court: INTRODUCTION {1 Shortly before she passed away in 2006, Darlene Patterson (Darlene) executed an amendment (the Amendment) to the Darlene Patterson Family Protection Trust (the Trust). The purpose of the Amendment was to remove Darlene's son Ronald Patterson (Ron) as a beneficiary. On summary judgment, the district court invalidated the Amendment based o

248 P.3d 204 (2011) In re the Marriage of Raquel Helena PATTERSON, Petitioner/Appellant, v. Shawn Jamaal PATTERSON, Respondent/Appellee. No. 1 CA-CV 10-0118. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department D. February 10, 2011. *205 Mushkatel & Becker, PLLC By Mathis Becker and Zachary Mushkatel, Sun City, Attorneys for P

On May 3 or May 4, 2010, the St. Clair Circuit Court entered a judgment divorcing Barbara Jean Patterson ("the wife") from Raymond Lindsey Patterson ("the husband"). On June 1, 2010, the wife filed a motion that she titled "Petition to Modify Decree." In her motion, she argued, among other things, that the trial court should have awarded alimony to her, should have awarded half of the husband's retirement income to her, and should have awarded an attorney's fee to her; she did not con

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Oneida County (Frank S. Cook, J.H.O.), entered March 17, 2009 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order granted the parties joint legal child custody with Michael Patterson having primary physical custody and Judi Patterson having visitation. It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is *1658unanimously

8 So.3d 363 (2009) PATTERSON v. PATTERSON. No. 2D09-2012. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. May 5, 2009. Decision without published opinion. Cert.dismissed.

20 So.3d 65 (2009) Gregory Williams PATTERSON, Appellant v. Tara PATTERSON, Appellee. No. 2008-CP-01692-COA. Court of Appeals of Mississippi. October 20, 2009. *67 Gregory Williams Patterson, Appellant, pro se. Nancy M. Maddox, Olive Branch, attorney for appellee. Before LEE, P.J., GRIFFIS and ROBERTS, JJ. GR

972 A.2d 312 (2009) PATTERSON v. PATTERSON. No. 608, 2008. Supreme Court of Delaware. April 21, 2009. Decision without published opinion AFFIRMED.

Decisions of the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals Without Published Opinions, Affirmed.

211 S.W.3d 661 (2007) Naomi PATTERSON, Respondent, v. Josiah PATTERSON, Appellant. No. WD 66409. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. January 23, 2007. *662 Brian C. Greer, Kansas City, for Appellant. Heather Renee Roach, Kansas City, for Respondent. PAUL M. SPINDEN, Judge. Josiah Patterson appeals th

207 S.W.3d 179 (2006) Mark PATTERSON, Appellant-Respondent, v. Rhonda PATTERSON, Respondent-Appellant. Nos. 26822, 26824. Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division One. October 11, 2006. Motion for Rehearing or Transfer Denied October 30, 2006. Application for Transfer Denied December 19, 2006.

BRIDGES, J., concurring in part, dissenting in part: ¶ 15. On one aspect, I agree with the majority. The chancery court should not have held Mr. Patterson in contempt for failing to pay Mrs. Broach alimony after Mrs. Broach remarried. However, I feel that the majority is incorrect in holding that the chancellor erred when he found Mr. Patterson in contempt for changing the benef