Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Patrick Gutierrez”
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 23, 2025 NO. 03-25-00341-CV Jim Clements, Guadalupe Gutierrez, Cynthia Gutierrez, and Carolyn Lehmann, Appellants v. Jason McBroom, Holly McBroom, Linda McBroom, William Michael McBroom, Kevin Patrick McBroom, and Melissa Jo McBroom, Appel
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-25-00341-CV NO. 03-25-00442-CV Jim Clements, Guadalupe Gutierrez, Cynthia Gutierrez, and Carolyn Lehmann, Appellants v. Jason McBroom, Holly McBroom, Linda McBroom, William Michael McBroom, Kevin Patrick McBroom, and Melissa Jo McBroom, Appellees
Opinion issued February 20, 2014 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-12-00490-CV ——————————— ANGELINA GAILEY, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS EXECUTRIX OF ESTATE OF PATRICK L. GAILEY, DAN PATRICK GAILEY, AND PATRI
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON ORDER Appellate case name: Angelina Gailey Individually and as Executrix of Estate of Patrick L. Gailey, Dan Patrick Gailey, and Patrick L. Gailey v. Pasqual Gutierrez Appellate case number: 01-12-00490-CV Trial court case number: 0904324 Trial court: 61st District Court of Harris
Gutierrez v. Noothpublic domain
ARMSTRONG, P. J. Petitioner was convicted of attempted first-degree rape, three counts of first-degree sexual abuse, and two counts of attempted aggravated murder. He subsequently sought post-conviction relief, contending that his trial counsel in the criminal case had provided him with constitutionally inadequate representation by failing to move to suppress evidence that he asserts that the state had obtained in violation of
Opinion issued January 10, 2013 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-12-00491-CV ——————————— ANGELINA GAILEY, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS EXECUTRIX OF ESTATE OF PATRICK L. GAILEY, DAN PATRICK GAILEY, AND PATRICK L. GAILEY, Appellants
COURT OF APPEALS FOIl THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON ORDER Appellate case name: Angelina Gailey Individually and as Executrix of Estate of Patrick L. Gailey, Dan Patrick Gailey, and Patrick L. Gailey v. Pasqual Gutierrez Appellate case number: 01-12-00490-CV Trial court case number: 0904324 Trial court: 61 st District Court of Harris C
State v. Patrick Segundo Oarpublic domain
GUTIERREZ, Judge Patrick Segundo Oar appeals from his judgment of conviction for grand theft by extortion following a jury trial. Specifically, Oar argues there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction and the district court imposed an excessive sentence. We affirm. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
State v. James Patrick Stell, Jr.public domain
GUTIERREZ, Judge James Patrick Stell Jr. appeals from his judgment of conviction after a jury returned a guilty verdict for aggravated assault, with a deadly weapon enhancement; malicious injury to property; possession of drug paraphernalia; and carrying a concealed weapon while under the influence. Stell first argues the trial court erred in
Fleming v. Gutierrezpublic domain
TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judge. The 2012 elections in Sandoval County, New Mexico, were marked by long lines and crowded polling places. Several voters filed a challenge to the County’s administration of the election, and the district court concluded that the County’s election procedures were so dysfunctional that an immediate remedy was necessary to avoid voter disenfranchisement in
State v. Benjamin Patrick Duganpublic domain
GUTIERREZ, Chief Judge. Benjamin Patrick Dugan appeals from his judgment of conviction entered upon his conditional guilty plea to the crime of injuring jails. Specifically, Dugan argues the district court erred by denying his motion to dismiss. For the reasons that follow, we affirm. I. FACTS AND PROCEDURE
State v. Garcia-Gutierrezpublic domain
OPINION CHUTICH, Judge. In this pretrial appeal, the state argues that the district court erred by dismissing charges of first-degree burglary — possession of a dangerous weapon for lack of probable cause. Because the district court properly concluded that possession must be knowing and that the evidence does not *921establish probable cause under
Patriot General Insurance v. Gutierrezpublic domain
¶1 Fearing, J. We granted discretionary review of the trial court’s summary judgment ruling that Javier Gutierrez is an insured for purposes of underinsured motorist coverage on an automobile insurance policy purchased from Patriot General Insurance Company by Jorge Gutierrez, Javier’s father. Patriot General insists that Javier is not an insured because Jorge failed to disclose him, on his initial insurance appli
State v. Garcia-Gutierrezpublic domain
WRIGHT, Justice (concurring). Based on our case law and the structure of Minn.Stat. § 609.582 (2012), I concur with the conclusion of the majority that the State is not required to prove knowledge of possession as an element of burglary in the first degree. I write separately, however, to express my concern that, under the unusual factual circumstances *527
United States v. Gutierrez-Fariaspublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** In these consolidated appeals, Hermilo Gutierrez-Farias appeals the 37-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326, and the four-month consecutive sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Gutierrez-Farias contends that the
Patrick v. Rivera-Lopezpublic domain
HOWARD, Circuit Judge. Lisandro Patrick appeals a decision of the United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico dismissing his peti *17 tion for the return of his child under the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of Child Abduction. He also appeals the district court’s order that he
In Re Gutierrezpublic domain
224 S.W.3d 723 (2006) In re Cynthia GUTIERREZ. No. 08-06-00177-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, El Paso. June 29, 2006. Luis C. Labrado, El Paso, for relator. Patrick Bramblett, Bramblett & Associates, El Paso, for interested party. Before BARAJAS, C.J., McCLURE, and CHEW, JJ. OPINION ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DAVID WELL
United States v. Santiago Gutierrez-Cejapublic domain
POSNER, Circuit Judge. The defendant pleaded guilty to being in the United States illegally after having been removed. The judge sentenced him to 84 months in prison. The statutory maximum prison sentence for illegal reentry is usually 2 years, 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), but removal after conviction for an aggravated felony (the defendant had two such convictions) jacks up the maximum
United States v. Gutierrezpublic domain
UNITED STATES, Appellant v. Juan R. GUTIERREZ, Private First Class U.S. Army, Appellee No. 08-5004 Crim. App. No. 20040596 United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces Argued March 17, 2008 Decided May 27, 2008 STUCKY, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in wh
Gutierrez v. Gonzalespublic domain
MEMORANDUM **** Alexander Fragante Gutierrez, a native and citizen of the Philippines, petitions for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming without opinion the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of Gutierrez’s application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b). We rev