Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Patricia M Tay”
C & E SERVICES, INC. v. Ashland, Inc.public domain
601 F.Supp.2d 262 (2009) C & E SERVICES, INC., and Carl L. Biggs, Plaintiffs, v. ASHLAND INC., Defendant. Civil Action No. 03-1857(JMF). United States District Court, District of Columbia. March 9, 2009. *265 Daniel Marino, Jay M. McDannell, Sarah Elizabeth Kleven, Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP, Washington, DC, for Plai
C & E SERVICES, INC. v. Ashland, Inc.public domain
(2008) C & E SERVICES, INC., and Carl L. Biggs, Plaintiff, v. ASHLAND INC., Defendant. Civil Action No. 03-1857 (JMF). United States District Court, District of Columbia. March 26, 2008. MEMORANDUM OPINION JOHN M. FACCIOLA, United States Magistrate Judge. Before me are Defendant Ashland Inc.'s First Motion In Limine (Testimony and Refe
Yi Tai Shao v. Tsan-Kuen Wangpublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Yi Tai Shao, AKA Linda Yi Tai Shao, appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing her action alleging various federal and state law claims stemming from state-court custody proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a district court’s dismissal for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), fo
In re T.S.M.public domain
OPINION Justice BAER. We granted review in this case involving petitions for termination of parental rights for five siblings to consider how trial courts should weigh the existence of “pathological” emotional bonds between parents and children. This family of seven children, the five youngest of whom are before the Court, epitomizes the problem of foster care drift, as the family has been involved w
Clearon Corp. v. United Statespublic domain
JUDGMENT Per Curiam This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Ajudged: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
Jay Franklin Smith v. Patricia Ann Smithpublic domain
I N THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE EASTERN SECTI ON FILED March 6, 1996 Cecil Crowson, Jr. J AY FRANKLI N SM TH, I ) C/ A NO. 03A01- 9511- C ourt Clerk Appellate
M. v. Secretary of Health and Human Servicespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS Filed: August 31, 2017 1 Refiled in Redacted Form: February 7, 2018 PUBLISHED J.M. and V.M., in their Own Right and as Best Friends of their Son, V.J.M., No. 02-10V Petitioners, Chief Special Ma
Albert Ray Williams v. Great Western Distributing Company of Amarillo D/B/A Bill Reed Distributing Companypublic domain
5/1 1 /201 5 Patricia Henderson District C|erk Tay|or County, Texas .Kathy Conway ¢ZL,M)L{' 6 CAUSE NO. 2559$3"“" ALBERT RAY WILLIAMS IN THE 104TH DIsTRICT COURT Plaintiff § § § R vs § oF 4r . , § `Z‘LK'QL DAKOTAH CLAY CROX'I`ON & § GREAT WESTERN DISTRIBUTING § COMPANY OF AMARILLO d/b/a § BILL REED DISTRIBUTING § COMPANY, GERMANIA SELECT § INSURANCE COlV.[PANY & § PHILADELPHIA INDElVlNITY § INSURANCE COMPANY § § Defendants § TAYLOR COUNTY, TEXAS ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMA
Matter of Tai-Gi K. (Nadine B.)public domain
Matter of Tai-Gi K. (Nadine B.) (2020 NY Slip Op 00586) Matter of Tai-Gi K. (Nadine B.) 2020 NY Slip Op 00586 Decided on January 29, 2020 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting B
277 B.R. 181 (2002) In re HAGERSTOWN FIBER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Debtor. David R. Kittay, Trustee For Hagerstown Fiber Limited: Partnership, Plaintiff, v. Carl C. Landegger, Pencor First Fiber, Inc., SBCCS Constructors Joint Venture, The Black Clawson Company, Black Clawson Partner, Inc., Simons Engineering, Inc., AMEC E & C Services, Inc., Sea Crest Industries, Inc., Sea Crest Construction Corporation, Peter Scalamandre & Sons, Inc.,
DAVID A. NELSON, Circuit Judge. Where a criminal proceeding is terminated by the declaration of a mistrial to which the defendant did not consent and for which there was no “manifest necessity,” the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment bars retrial of the defendant for the same offense. See United States v. Jorn, 400 U.S. 470, 481, 91 S.Ct. 547, 55
Fuld v. Booth Foundation, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION LEWIS A. KAPLAN, District Judge. Richard S. Fuld, Jr., the former chairman and chief executive officer of Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. (“LBHI”) is the sole remaining respondent in an arbitration entitled Booth Foundation, Inc. v. Martin D. Shafiroff, et al., No. 09-01844, now pending before the Financial Industry *554R
Fusong Jinlong Wooden Grp. Co. v. United Statespublic domain
Slip Op. 24–103 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE : FUSONG JINLONG WOODEN GROUP CO., : LTD. ET AL., : : Plaintiffs, : : YIHUA LIFESTYLE TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. : ET AL., :
Kidd v. District of Columbiapublic domain
FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT ~pURT JAN 1 2 2010 FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLiMBIA Clerk, U.S. District and Bankruptcy Courts Patricia Kidd, )
706 F.Supp.2d 552 (2010) In re LEHMAN BROTHERS SECURITIES AND ERISA LITIGATION This document applies to: 09 MD 2017(LAK) In the Matter of the Application of Richard S. Fuld, Jr., Petitioner, v. Booth Foundation, Inc. Respondent. Nos. 09 MD 2017(LAK), M-82. United States District Court, S.D. New York. April 21, 2010. *553
ACCEPTED 04-15-00534-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 12/18/2015 4:46:17 PM
HLDS (B) Steel SDN BHD v. United Statespublic domain
Slip Op. 24-6 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE Court No. 21-00638 HLDS (B) STEEL SDN BHD and HLD CLARK STEEL PIPE CO., INC., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and WELDED TUBE USA, INC., WHEATLAND TUBE COMPANY, and VALLOUREC STAR L.P., Defendant-Intervenors.
United States v. Brookspublic domain
DRONEY, Circuit Judge: On September 14, 2010, David H. Brooks was convicted in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Seybert, J.) after a jury trial on multiple counts of offenses relating to securities fraud, mail and wire fraud, and obstruction of justice. He was also convicted of related tax offenses based on his guilty pleas, which occurred after the jury’s verdict. Shortly before trial,
State v. Ho Taipublic domain
629 A.2d 594 (1993) STATE of Maine v. Ho TAI. Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Argued May 11, 1993. Decided July 30, 1993. Stephanie Anderson, Dist. Atty., Jane Elizabeth Lee (orally), Patricia Mador, Asst. Dist. Attys., Portland, for the state. *595 Peter E. Rodway (orally), Portland, for defendant. Before WATHEN,
ACCEPTED 03-17-00365-cv 21266118 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS