Cases

NO. 12-18-00206-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS DEBRA E. MORRISON, § APPEAL FROM THE APPELLANT V. § COUNTY COURT AT LAW PATRICIA J. COLBERT, ADMINISTRATRIX OF ESTATE OF BOBBIE ALLEN CARTER, DECEASED, § ANDER

ROBERTS, J., for the Court: ¶ 1. Ruth Colbert appeals the Hinds County Chancery Court’s decision to deny her petition to set aside George William Mace’s will. According to Colbert, Mace lacked the testamentary capacity to execute his will. Colbert also claims that the chancellor should have set aside Mace’s will because it was the product of Patricia Gardner’s undue influence over Mace. Finding no error, we aff

BECKWITH, Associate Judge, dissenting: . The court holds that Ellsworth Colbert’s claim under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963), fails because he has not demonstrated that the contents of thé North Carolina file were material to his murder trial. Ante at 332. That materiality determination, for me, is genuinely hampered by the fact that the trial court did n

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF COURT TERRENCE F. McVERRY, District Judge. Before the Court for disposition is the MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTS III AND V OF THE PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT, with brief in support, filed by Defendant Mercy Behavioral Health (Document Nos. 4 and 8), the BRIEF IN OPPOSITION filed by Plaintiff, Trida A. Colbert (Document No. 9), and the REPLY BRIEF filed by Defendant (Document No. 10).

553 S.E.2d 221 (2001) STATE of North Carolina, Plaintiff, v. Michael Dalton COLBERT, Defendant. No. COA00-715. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. October 16, 2001. *222 Attorney General Michael F. Easley, by Special Deputy Attorney General Isaac T. Avery, III and Patricia A. Duffy, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

[Cite as State v. Colbert, 2021-Ohio-3434.] COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO : JUDGES: : : Hon. Craig R. Baldwin, P.J. Plaintiff-Appellee : Hon. W. Scott

Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 23-CO-0409 ELLSWORTH W. COLBERT, APPELLANT, V. UNITED STATES,

People v Colbert (2018 NY Slip Op 04879) People v Colbert 2018 NY Slip Op 04879 Decided on June 29, 2018 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law §

MEMORANDUM HERBERT F. MURRAY, Senior District Judge. Plaintiff Patricia Colbert brought this action against the State of Maryland Department of Corrections, Maryland Correctional Institute (“Department”), alleging discrimination on the basis of sex, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., as amended 1972. Colbert contends that the promotion of four ma

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 619 KA 08-00617 PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, AND SCONIERS, JJ. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ANTHONY D. COLBERT, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. TIMOTHY P. DONAHER, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (MATTHEW J. CLARK OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. MICHAEL C. GREEN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, R

102 S.W.3d 445 (2003) Craig COLBERT, Appellant, v. Robbie HOLLIS, Appellee. No. 05-02-01675-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas. April 14, 2003. *447 Russ Wayne Harris, Office of the Attorney General, Austin, for appellant. Alex Vasquez, Mark Douglas Cronenwett, Cowles & Thompson, P.C., Dallas, for appellee. B

01/18/2022 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE May 25, 2021 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. RICHARD G. WILLIAMS, KIPLING COLBERT, JR., AND CHRISTOPHER BASSETT, JR. Appeal from the Criminal Court for Knox County Nos. 110855, 110856, 110857 Steven Wayne Sword, Judge

September 15 2015 DA 14-0732 Case Number: DA 14-0732 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 2015 MT 274 PATRICIA O'CONNOR, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. REBECCA JAYNE GEORGE,

11 DISSENT: KAUGER (I DISSENT TO THE PREMATURE CONSIDERATION OF THIS QUESTION OF FIRST AND LAST IMPRESSION. THIS CASE SHOULD GO TO TRIAL AND THEN ANY PARTY MAY APPEAL THE VERDICT BASED UPON A COMPLETED RECORD.), J., TAYLOR (JOINS KAUGER, J.), C.J., WINCHESTER (JOINS KAUGER, J.), J. 12 NOT PARTICIPATING: COLBERT, V.C.J.

SHEPHERD, C.J. R.C., the respondent in a petition filed by the Florida Department of Children and Families seeking to terminate her parental rights in her three children, seeks certiorari relief from a sua sponte order of the trial court directing her to submit to a pregnancy test. Because the trial court wholly failed to afford R.C. notice and there is no showing of good caus

*1046 MEMORANDUM OPINION COLBERT, J. ¶ 1 Guardian of her disabled adult son petitions this Court to assume original jurisdiction and issue a writ prohibiting the trial court from exercising jurisdiction over the claims of two discharged domestic workers. Original jurisdictio

86 S.W.3d 202 (2001) MARION COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION v. MARION COUNTY EDUCATION ASSOCIATION. Court of Appeals of Tennessee, Middle Section, at Nashville. August 7, 2001. *204 William Henry Haile, Nashville, TN, for appellant, Marion County Board of Education. Richard Lee Colbert, Nashville, TN, for appellee, Marion County Education Associ

MEMORANDUM & ORDER YOUNG, DISTRICT JUDGE I. INTRODUCTION This case arises out of a decision of the Secretary of the Department of the Interi*392or (the “Secretary”) to acquire land in trust for the benefit of the Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe (the “Mashpees”) under Section 465 of the Indian Reorganization Act (“IRA”), 25 U.S.C. §

ORDER YOUNG, D.J. This action concerns the taking of certain land into trust by the United States Department of the Interior (the “Department”) for the benefit of the Mashpee Wampanoag Indian Tribe (the “Mashpees”) pursuant to the Indian Reorganization Act, 25 U.S.C. § 479. On July 28, 2016, the Court ruled that the government’s acquisition of the land at issue was improper, at least on the ground proffer

GURICH, J. ¶ In Ball v. Multiple Injury Trust Fund, 2015 OK 64, 360 P.3d 499, this Court held that under the 2005 version of 85 0.8. § 171 an employee must be a physically impaired person as defined by the applicable statute before he or she can seek benefits from the Multiple Injury Trust Fund. In Ball, the Claimant had no prior adjudicated on-the-job injuries but sought to combine a