Cases

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed August 20, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D24-2024 Lower Tribunal No. 05-26630-CC-23 ________________ East Coast Recovery, Inc., Appellant,

Benham, Justice. **524In June of 2015, cross-appellant Quantravious Antwan Holmes was convicted of malice murder and other offenses arising out of the shooting death of his friend Todd Burkes.1 The trial court granted Holmes' motion for new trial on two grounds: on the ground that the

OPINION OF THE COURT Per Curiam. The Grievance Committee for the Second, Eleventh, and Thirteenth Judicial Districts served the respondent with a petition dated July 25, 2013, containing a single charge of professional misconduct. After a prehearing conference on January 30, 2014, and a hearing on March 7, 2014, the Special Referee issued a report which sus

MEMORANDUM OPINION ROBINSON, Senior District Judge I. INTRODUCTION On May 13, 2013, Medford Holmes (“Holmes”) filed a complaint against defendants City of Wilmington (the “City”), police detective Kimberly Pfaff (“Pfaff’), police detective Randy Nowell (“Nowell”), and John Doe numbers 1 through 10 (collectively, the “defendants”) asserting various federal civil rights and state law tor

948 N.E.2d 617 (2011) 241 Ill.2d 509 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Appellee, v. Leonard HOLMES, Jr., Appellant. No. 109130. Supreme Court of Illinois. April 7, 2011. *619 Michael J. Pelletier, State Appellate Defender, Patricia Unsinn and Alan D. Goldberg, Deputy Defenders, and Kristine A. Neal, Ass

PER CURIAM. Brenda Holmes appeals a non-final order denying her motion to certify the class. We affirm the trial court's order determining that Holmes failed to establish the typicality and predominance elements required under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.220(a) and 1.220(b)(3), respectively. See Easter v. City of Orlando ,

By Judge Norman A. Thomas *515In this case, Ms. Patricia Holmes (“Plaintiff’), the Administrator of the Estate of Thomas Holmes (“Holmes” or “the decedent”), sues numerous defendants for the alleged wrongful death of her decedent and son, Holmes. (4th Am. Compl. 1, ¶¶ 2, 72.) On October 29, 2009, Plaintiff filed her Fourth Amended Complaint, and she supplemented that p

RUDMAN, J. [¶ 1] Gary E. Holmes appeals from a judgment entered in the District Court (West Bath, Field, J.), which found him guilty of operating a motor vehicle after the suspension of his driver’s license in violation of 29-A M.R.S.A. § 2412-A(1) (Class E) (1996).1 Holmes contends that the Secretary of State erred when it imposed a one-year suspension of his license and that there was i

hTERRI F. LOVE, Judge. Plaintiffs in this case, Donald J. Nalty and Frank E. Schmidt, were former directors of D.H. Holmes Company, Ltd., who now claim benefits under the D.H. Holmes Company, Ltd., Executive Savings Retirement Plan. Defendants, D.H. Holmes Company, Ltd., claim that Plaintiffs are not eligible for benefits because the directors violated the Interested Directors Statute, and the Plaintiffs were voluntarily termi

People v Holmes (2023 NY Slip Op 05150) People v Holmes 2023 NY Slip Op 05150 Decided on October 11, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

149 B.R. 251 (1993) Thomas A. SCHULZ, Patricia L. Schulz, Curtis S. Schulz, etc., v. HOLMES TRANSPORTATION, INC., John J. Molnar, Sr. Civ. A. No. 91-11454-WF. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. January 21, 1993. *252 David P. Angueira, Bowditch & Dewey, Garrahan & Lander, Framingham, MA, for plaintiffs. <

Judgment rendered November 19, 2025. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, La. C.C.P. No. 56,603-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA ***** SUCCESSION OF

People v Holmes (2022 NY Slip Op 03744) People v Holmes 2022 NY Slip Op 03744 Decided on June 8, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

In a child visitation proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Rouse, J.), dated February 14, 2013, which, after a hearing, granted the mother’s petition to modify the visitation provisions of an order of the same court (Burke, Ct. Atty. Ref.), dated March 21, 2012, entered upon the consent of the parties. Ordered that the order dated February 14, 2013, is a

In a child visitation proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Rouse, J.), dated February 14, 2013, which, after a hearing, granted the mother’s petition to modify the visitation provisions of an order of the same court (Burke, Ct. Atty. Ref.), dated March 21, 2012, entered upon the consent of the parties. Ordered that the order dated February 14, 2013, is a

ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of - ) ) Patricia I. Romero, Inc. d/b/a Pacific West ) ASBCA No. 63093 Builders ) ) Under Contract No. N62473-08-D-8655 ) APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: David A. Rose, Esq. Rose Con

OPINION ELSA ALCALA, Justice. Appellant, Harold Holmes, appeals a judgment in favor of appellee, Amy Williams, determining and rendering judgment for child-support arrearages, including accrued interest, and ordering that Williams be entitled to issue child-support liens, levies, and writs of income withholding as remedies for the collection of unpaid child

BENHAM, Justice. Appellant Martin Napoleon Holmes appeals his convictions from a multi-victim crime spree which included the shooting death of *144Rickey Gibson.1 We affirm. This Court previously considered the instant trial record in the appeal of appellant’s co-defendant Willie Butler and summarized the evidence as fol

307 Ga. 441 FINAL COPY S19A1146. HOLMES v. THE STATE. BOGGS, Justice. Ronnie Darnell Holmes challenges his 2015 convictions for felony murder and other crimes in connection with the shooting death of Terry Mack. Holmes argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion for directed verdict on the armed robbery charge underlying his felony murder conviction and his felony murder conviction, and that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to move to s

198 Ill. App.3d 766 (1989) 556 N.E.2d 539 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. LONZA HOLMES, Defendant-Appellant. No. 1-86-2447. Illinois Appellate Court — First District (1st Division). Opinion filed December 4, 1989. Rehearing denied July 18, 1990. *767