Cases

OPINION AND ORDER FEUERSTEIN, District Judge: Pro se Plaintiff Rodolfo Frias (“Plaintiff’ or “Frias”) commenced this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c)(3), seeking judicial review of the final determination of Defendant Commissioner of Social Security (“Defendant” or “Commissioner”) denying Plaintiffs Au*127gust 9, 2012 app

OPINION AND ORDER AIDA M. DELGADO-COLÓN, Chief Judge. Currently before the Court is U.S. Magistrate Judge Justo Arenas’ Report and Recommendation (“the R & R”) recommending the dismissal of this action. ECF No. 11. Objections have not been filed to the R & R. I. Procedural History On December 17, 2013, plaintiff Santiago Eduardo Padilla-Gómez

ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT WOODCOCK, District Judge. The Plaintiff, Peter Clifford, a former Social Security Administration (SSA) employee, is a fifty-five year old man with a physical disability who applied for, but was not selected for, three positions within the SSA. He has filed suit, claiming the SSA’s actions were based on his disability and age in violation of

OPINION AND ORDER AIDA M. DELGADO-COLÓN, Chief Judge. Currently before the Court is U.S. Magistrate Judge Justo Arenas’ Report and Recommendation (“the R & R”), recommending that plaintiff Elizabeth Ramos-Rodriguez’s (“plaintiff’) complaint (ECF No. 1) be dismissed and the decision of defendant, the Commissioner of Social Security (“defendant”), be affirmed. ECF No. 20. The R & R was filed

ORDER NORMAN A. MORDUE, District Judge. The above matter comes to me following a ReporUReeommendation by Magistrate Judge Victor E. Bianehini, duly filed on the 29th day of February 2012. Following fourteen (14) days from the service thereof, the Clerk has sent me the file, including any and all objections filed by the parties herein. After careful review of all of the papers h

ORDER SCULLIN, Senior District Judge. Plaintiff commenced this action on November 23, 2009, seeking judicial review of Defendant’s final decision denying him supplement security income benefits and .disability insurance benefits under the Social Security Act. See Dkt. No. 1. Defendant filed an answer on March 8, 2010. See Dkt. No. 8. Plaintiff filed a supporting brief on March 22, 2010,

(2008) Edith M. SOSA, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. CIV. No. 05-2241 (PG). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. April 16, 2008. ORDER JUAN M. PEREZ-GIMENEZ, District Judge. Before the Court is the Magistrate Judges's Report and Recommendation affirming the decision of the Commissioner of Social Secu

MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER NORMAN A. MORDUE, Senior District Judge. Plaintiff applied for Supplemental'Security Income on behalf of her son, D.M.S., a *384minor child, alleging disability due to attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (“ADHD”), oppositional defiant disorder (“ODD”), and a learning disorder. Plaintiff requested a hearing before

381 F.Supp.2d 5 (2005) Hector DELGADO-QUILES, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. Civil No. 04-1951 (DRD). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. July 30, 2005. Ramon H. Rivera-Sanchez, San Juan, PR, for Plaintiff. *6 Lisa E. Bhatia-Gautier, San Juan, PR, for Defendant. AMEND

380 F.Supp.2d 54 (2005) Awilda VEGA-MORALES, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. Civil No. 04-1741 (DRD). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. July 30, 2005. *55 Raul Torres-Rodriguez, Torres & Santiago Law Office, San Juan, PR, for Plaintiff. Lisa E. Bhatia-Gautier, United States Attorne

*531 OPINION CARR, District Judge. Claimant-Appellant, Ruby E. Heston (“Heston”) filed an application for disability benefits which was denied, and now appeals the district court’s decision upholding the denial of benefits. Heston challenges the decision of the Administrative Law J

327 F.Supp.2d 401 (2004) Roberta FARBER, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF PATERSON, Jose Torres, Elieser Burgis, Marge DiPasquale, and Local 3474, American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO, Defendants. No. CIV 03-4535(DRD). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. June 7, 2004. *402

598 F.Supp.2d 289 (2009) DISABILITY ADVOCATES, INC., Plaintiff, v. David A. PATERSON, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of New York, Richard F. Daines, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Health, Michael F. Hogan, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the New York State Office of Mental Health, the New York State Department of Health, and the New York State Office of Mental Health, De

991 A.2d 254 (2010) 412 N.J. Super. 426 CATHOLIC FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVICES (Friendship Corner I and Friendship Corner II), Petitioner-Appellant, v. STATE-OPERATED SCHOOL DISTRICT OF the CITY OF PATERSON, Passaic County, and Paterson Internal Audit Unit, New Jersey State Department of Education, Respondents-Respondents. A-0438-08T1 Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Divi

653 F.Supp.2d 184 (2009) DISABILITY ADVOCATES, INC., Plaintiff, v. David A. PATERSON, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of New York, Richard F. Daines, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Health, Michael F. Hogan, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the New York State Office of Mental Health, the New York State Department of Health, and the New York State Office of Mental Health, De

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER PRATT, District Judge. Plaintiff, Connie M. Patterson, filed a Complaint in this Court on May 28, 1997, seeking review of the Commissioner’s decision to deny her claim for disability insurance benefits under Title II and Title XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 401 et seq., 1381 et seq., This Court may review a final decision by the Commissioner. 42 U.

RALPH G. THOMPSON, District Judge. Claimant Ray Marshall appeals the district court’s affirmance of the decision by the Secretary of Health and Human Services reopening claimant’s March 8, 1988 eligibility determination for blind benefits, terminating his benefits upon a finding that he engaged in substantial gainful activity in 1986, and authorizing recovery of the amounts over

USCA11 Case: 21-12314 Document: 131-1 Date Filed: 03/14/2025 Page: 1 of 169 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-12314 ____________________ NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIAT

KEVIN MCNULTY, United States District Judge Plaintiff Ellen Heine sues, along with others, as an owner, occupant, or person otherwise interested in a building at 515 Van Bussum Avenue in Garfield, New Jersey (the "Property"). Familiarity with my several prior opinions on dispositive motions is assumed, and this Opinion should *472be read in c

KATHERINE POLK FAILLA, District Judge: The parties to this interpleader all claim ownership over certain property purchased with funds that Ferdinand and Imelda Marcos allegedly misappropriated during Mr. Marcos's presidency of the Philippines (the "Interpleader Property"). The property at issue includes approximately $15 million in cash and seized funds from several bank accounts; Claude Monet's L'Église et La Seine à Vétheuil<