Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Patel v. Secretary, Department of Homeland Security”
Ranjan v. U.S. Department of Homeland Securitypublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ALKA RANJAN, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 23-2453 (LLA) v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) found that Plaintiff Alka Ranjan obtained a
Zaman v. U.S. Department of Homeland Securitypublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) MD ZAHIDUZ ZAMAN, ) a U.S. Citizen, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 19-3592 (ABJ) ) U.S. DEPARTMENT
Patel v. Johnsonpublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER YOUNG, District Judge. “Give me your tired, your poor, Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free.” Inscription on the Statute of Liberty2 Well, not quite. Today it might read, “Give us your educated, skilled laborers willing to work at jobs Americans either won’t or can’t do. If the
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) SARA GHADAMI, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 19-00397 (ABJ) ) UNITED STATES ) D
Rizvi v. Department of Homeland Securitypublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION LEE H. ROSENTHAL, District Judge. In this nation of immigrants, the United States limits the number of new immigrants it will admit and allow to remain as permanent residents. When a prospective employer petitions the United States for a visa on behalf of an alien on the basis that the alien has valuable skills that the employer needs, the United States requires proof that the alien
USCA11 Case: 17-15787 Date Filed: 12/23/2020 Page: 1 of 25 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 17-15787 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 9:17-cv-8027-RLR DOUGLAS BOURDON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
Case: 17-15787 Date Filed: 10/03/2019 Page: 1 of 42 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 17-15787 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 9:17-cv-80207-RLR DOUGLAS BOURDON,
Ibrahim v. Department of Homeland Securitypublic domain
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND ORDER FOR RELIEF WILLIAM ALSUP, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Introduction In this terrorist-watchlist challenge, a nonimmigrant alien seeks relief after having been barred airplane-boarding privileges and after having been denied a visa to return to the United States. This order includes the findings of fact and conclusions of law following a five-
Shalom Pentecostal Church v. Acting Secretary United States Department of Homeland Securitypublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT KRAUSE, Circuit Judge. The Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) enables an immigrant to obtain a visa as a “special immigrant religious worker” if the immigrant meets certain statutory criteria, including that he has been “carrying on” religious work for at least the two years preceding the filing of the visa petition. This case pre
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MARWAH AL IHSAN AL-GHARAWY, et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 21-1521 (RDM) v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiffs Marwah Al Ihsan Al-Gharawy, a U.S. citizen,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Y & N BUILDING SUPPLY US LLC, et al, : : Plaintiffs, : Civil Action No.: 24-03593 (RC) : v. : Re Document No.: 12 : UN
Alkeylani v. Department of Homeland Securitypublic domain
514 F.Supp.2d 258 (2007) Abd ALKEYLANI, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, et al., Defendants. Case No. 3:07-CV-504 (PCD). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. September 20, 2007. *259 Justin Conlon, Law Office of Michael Boyle, North Haven, CT, for Plaintiffs. William M. Brown, Jr., U.S. Atto
Soneji v. Department of Homeland Securitypublic domain
525 F.Supp.2d 1151 (2007) Deepakkumar Himatlal SONEJI and Kinnari Deepakkumar. Soneji, Plaintiffs, v. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, Michael Chertoff, Secretary; Federal Bureau of Investigation, Robert Mueller, Director; U.S. Attorney General, Alberto Gonzales; U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Robert Divine, Acting Director; U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Nebraska Service Center, Gerard Heinauer, Director, Defendants.<
Patel v. Jaddoupublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 23-1813, 23-1828 MONISHA GUPTA, SWAPNIL VIJAY KUMAR GADKARI, NIKUNJ PATEL, ANUJA PATEL, Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. UR MENDOZA JADDOU, Director, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, ANTONY BLINKEN, Secretary, United States Department of State, Defendant
Patel v. Garlandpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA VIMALKUMAR HARSHADBHAI PATEL, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 21-2915 (JEB) MERRICK GARLAND, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Vimalkumar Harshadbhai Patel, a citizen of India residing in South Carolina, sought a U visa from U.S. Citizenship and
Patel v. Garlandpublic domain
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2021 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit
Diop v. Ice/Homeland Securitypublic domain
656 F.3d 221 (2011) Cheikh DIOP, a/k/a Ibou Ndiaya, a/k/a Ebou Njie Cheikh Diop, Appellant v. ICE/HOMELAND SECURITY; Warden Mary E. Sabol; Thomas R. Decker; John P. Torres; Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security; Attorney General of the United States. No. 10-1113. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Argued January 24, 2011. Opinion File
Bhaktibhai-Patel v. Garlandpublic domain
19-2565 Bhaktibhai-Patel v. Garland In the United States Court of Appeals FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT AUGUST TERM 2020 No. 19-2565 PARESH KUMAR BHAKTIBHAI-PATEL, Petitioner, v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent.
Patel v. Ambit Grouppublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MONAL PATEL, Plaintiff, v. THE AMBIT GROUP, NATIONAL Civil Action No. 18-2985 (RDM) OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION, and NEIL JACOBS, Administrator,1 Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Monal Patel, proceeding pro se, bri
Sudhaben Patel v. Tracy Renaudpublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 22a0027p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ EDMER EUDULIO BARRIOS GARCIA (21-1037); │ DOUGLAS ARGUIJO (21-1056); ARDILES