Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION ABDUL K. KALLON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Joslin Ingram, Jodi Beckman, Jeff Smith, and Nathan Oliver bring this case against Wesley G. Passmore and Passmore Towing & Recovery (collectively “Pass-more” or “Defendants”). Doc. 1. Plaintiffs claim that Passmore willfully violated the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq., by failing to pay them overti

Juanita Johnson appeals from a summary judgment entered in favor of the defendants, James Passmore and Nancy Passmore, in a negligence action. The only question presented is whether Johnson presented substantial evidence tending to show that the Passmores breached a duty owed to Johnson and thereby caused her injury. On November 1, 1987, Johnson was visiting her daughter and son-in-law at the house they were renting from the Passmores. As Johnson prepared to leave the house and

552 S.E.2d 816 (2001) 274 Ga. 200 PASSMORE v. The STATE. No. S01A0637. Supreme Court of Georgia. September 17, 2001. *817 Peter D. Johnson, Augusta, for appellant. Daniel J. Craig, Dist. Atty., Charles R. Sheppard, Asst. Dist. Atty., Thurbert E. Baker, Atty. Gen., Daniel G. Ashburn, Asst. Atty. Gen.

Phipps, Judge. Gail Passmore and her husband sued Tammy Thomas for injuries arising out of an automobile collision. Thomas was a resident of Georgia at the time of the collision, but later moved to California. The Passmores obtained an order from Crisp County Superior Court specially appointing “MLQ Attorney Services or its designated agent who is qualified to effect service of process in Contra Costa County, California” to s

Andrea R. Wood, United States District Judge Plaintiffs Aaron C. Passmore and Jerry O. Griffin are pretrial detainees confined at Will County Adult Detention Facility ("WCADF"). Plaintiffs claim that they suffered skin irritations on their genitals from dirty underwear and were denied medical treatment for their symptoms. Plaintiffs thus have brought this lawsuit pursuant to

Doyle, Presiding Judge. *380 Beau Phillip Woodall ("the father") appeals an order from the Superior Court of Henry County granting James W. Johnson's ("the stepfather") stepparent petition to adopt the father's son, B. M. W., and terminating the father's parental rights to the child. The fat

786 S.W.2d 35 (1990) Jack R. SALES, Appellant, v. John G. PASSMORE, Co-Independent Executor of Grace Sales, Appellee. No. 08-89-00314-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, El Paso. February 14, 1990. Rehearing Overruled March 14, 1990. *36 Edward Dunbar, Christie, Berry and Dunbar, El Paso, for appellant. Phillip

[Cite as Discover Bank v. Passmore, 2016-Ohio-3121.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAKE COUNTY, OHIO DISCOVER BANK, : OPINION Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NO. 2015-L-098 - vs - : THERE

JUSTICE NELSON delivered the Opinion of the Court. ¶1 Terence R. Passmore appeals from his convictions of one count of sexual intercourse without consent and three counts of sexual assault following a jury trial in the Sixth Judicial District Court, Park County. We affirm. ISSUES

The order is affirmed.

MEMORANDUM OPINION EMMET G. SULLIVAN, United States District Judge This matter is béfore the Court on D¿-fendarit’s Second Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 43]. For the reasons discussed below, the motion will be granted. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff “is a State Prisoner currently confined at SCI FOREST

GARWOOD, Circuit Judge: Appellant Passmore appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion to dismiss the indictment against him on grounds of double jeopardy. We affirm. Passmore and John Dorr were charged with, and following a trial by jury convicted of, conspiracy to import marihuana into the Uni

156 B.R. 595 (1993) In re George PASSMORE. Bankruptcy No. 93-21419 MDM. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin. July 19, 1993. *596 George Passmore, pro se. Larry Liebzeit, Appleton, WI, for James and Elizabeth Hensel. MEMORANDUM DECISION M. DEE McGARITY, Bankruptcy Judge. ISSUE

OSCN Found Document:STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. JOHNSON Previous Case Top Of Index This Point in Index Citationize Next Case Print Only </

CLINTON, Judge, concurring. Without joining in thé manner by which the Court disposes of the third ground of error, I concur in the judgment. What concerns me is curious treatment afforded the claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. Ground of error two is overruled because “nothing is presented for review” in that defense counsel did not perfect a bill of exception or make an offer

A bill of complaint by C. W. Cooper sought the cancellation of record of notices of mechanics liens filed by W. H. Passmore upon real estate of Cooper, the theory being that the liens were not authorized by the statute. By answer and cross bill Passmore asserted the validity of his liens and prayed for their enforcement. The Court dismissed the original bill and decreed an enforcement of the mechanic's liens. An appeal was taken by Cooper. By a contract between the parties, Pass

326 S.W.3d 812 (2010) Danielle JOHNSON, Individually and as Parent and Next Friend of Alaya Dakota Johnson, a Minor, and Larry Wells as Administrator of the Estate of Larry Demond Johnson, Deceased, Appellants v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., Appellee. No. 2009-CA-000404-MR. Court of Appeals of Kentucky. February 19, 2010. Discretionary Review by Supreme Court D

147 F.2d 536 (1945) B. & H. PASSMORE METAL & ROOFING CO., Inc., v. NEW AMSTERDAM CASUALTY CO. No. 2959. Circuit Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. January 31, 1945. John A. Johnson, of Oklahoma City, Okl. (Henry S. Griffing, of Oklahoma City, Okl., on the brief), for appellant. James C. Cheek, of Oklahoma City, Okl. (Cheek, Gibson, Savage & Benefiel

253 P.2d 800 (1953) PASSMORE et al. v. AUSTIN et al. No. 7944. Supreme Court of Idaho. February 17, 1953. *801 Branch Bird and Cecil D. Hobdey, Gooding, for claimant. Hawley & Marcus, Boise, James, Shaw & James, Gooding, for employer. E. B. Smith, Boise, for respondents. PORTER, Chief Justice.

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 281 In this case, the trial court held that the absence of a favorable recommendation from a probation officer did not deprive the court of subject matter jurisdiction to grant early termination of a person's probation. Relying on technical defects in the appeal, the court of appeals affirmed. This Court granted