⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Pasadena Tournament of Roses Association v. City of Pasadena”

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995-07-24 · Published · cited 12× · 53 F.3d 1007; 1995 WL 242236
SAMUEL P. KING, Senior District Judge: Kirk Kilgour and the California Association of the Physically Handicapped, Chapter *100950 (collectively, “Kilgour”) filed this .action against the City of Pasadena, Pasadena Tournament of Roses Association, and Bull, Stockwell & Allen (collectively, “the City”) alleging violations of 29 U.S.C. § 794(b), 42 U.S.C. § 12131
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995-07-24 · Published · cited 28× · 53 F.3d 1007
53 F.3d 1007 4 A.D. Cases 579 Kirk KILGOUR and California Association of the PhysicallyHandicapped, Chapter 50, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.CITY OF PASADENA; Pasadena Tournament of Roses Assoc.;Bull, Stockwell & Allen, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-55903. United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitt
California Court of Appeal · 1975-05-19 · Published · cited 1× · 48 Cal. App. 3d 297; 121 Cal. Rptr. 750; 1975 Cal. App. LEXIS 1114
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 299 OPINION Mary Ann Bresnahan, Dana F. Bresnahan, Robert E. Carlson, Maureen E. Carlson, Douglas G. Ritchie (petitioners) who are taxpayers unsuccessfully sought a writ of mandate directed towards the City of Pasadena (City); Tournament of Roses Association (Association); Richard Pennack, direc
District Court, C.D. California · 1999-07-19 · Published · cited 18× · 56 F. Supp. 2d 1106; 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11032; 1999 WL 527723
56 F.Supp.2d 1106 (1999) CITY OF SOUTH PASADENA; et al., Plaintiffs, v. Rodney E. SLATER; et al., Defendants. No. CV98-6996DDP(MANx). United States District Court, C.D. California. July 19, 1999. *1107 *1108 *1109 Joseph W. Pannone, Kane Ballmer & Berkm
California Court of Appeal · 1929-11-14 · Published · cited 14× · 282 P. 820; 101 Cal. App. 769; 1929 Cal. App. LEXIS 1019
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 771 The plaintiff sued for damages for personal injuries resulting from the collapse of a temporary wooden "grandstand" erected for the convenience of spectators at festivities known as the "Tournament of Roses," held in the City of Pasadena. Demurrers to the complaint were sustained without leave to amend. A motion f
California Court of Appeal · 1957-11-22 · Published · cited 16× · 318 P.2d 199; 155 Cal. App. 2d 423; 1957 Cal. App. LEXIS 1304
155 Cal.App.2d 423 (1957) 318 P.2d 199 SUSAN McCLAIN, a Minor, etc., Appellant, v. CITY OF SOUTH PASADENA et al., Respondents. Docket No. 22181. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three. November 22, 1957. *426 A.L. Wirin and Hugh R. Manes for Appellant. Braeme E. Gigas, City
District Court, S.D. California · 1929-08-19 · Published · cited 0× · 37 F.2d 902; 1929 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1793
McCORMICK, District Judge. By order of court and upon motion, plaintiff has filed an amended'complaint wherein she seeks to recover damages for injuries alleged to have been sustained by her on January 1, 1926, in the collapse of a reviewing grand stand erected on real property of defendant Lockwood ‘in Pasadena, Cal., and constructed by defendant Mahoney for the purpose of providing seating accommodations for the guests and vi
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996-07-18 · Published · cited 6× · 554 N.W.2d 509; 203 Wis. 2d 469; 113 Educ. L. Rep. 904; 1996 Wisc. App. LEXIS 905
GARTZKE, P.J. Stanley W. Anderson, et al.1 appeal from an order dismissing their complaint against the Board of Regents of the University of California (UCLA) for failure to state a claim. Plaintiffs were customers of tour operators and ticket agencies with whom they contracted for tour packages to the *4761994 Rose Bowl game held on January
California Court of Appeal · 1973-08-30 · Published · cited 71× · 34 Cal. App. 3d 117; 109 Cal. Rptr. 724; 1973 Cal. App. LEXIS 786
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 119 OPINION This is an appeal from a summary judgment granted to defendants City of Los Angeles1 and U.S. Plywood-Champion Papers, Inc. (hereafter Plywood). The summary judgment stated that it was granted "on the ground that by reason of
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003-05-13 · Published · cited 295× · 328 F.3d 1165; 2003 Daily Journal DAR 5097; 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 9157; 84 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,386; 91 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1426; 2003 WL 21058241
*1169 PREGERSON, Circuit Judge. This appeal arises from the district court’s denial of defendant-appellant Circuit City Stores, Inc.’s (Circuit City) motion to compel arbitration. Circuit City moved to compel arbitration in response to the action plaintiff-appellee Catherine In-gle filed in the Souther
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008-11-25 · Published · cited 185× · 550 F.3d 465; 89 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1338; 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 24983; 2008 WL 4981326
550 F.3d 465 (2008) BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FOR LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY AGRICULTURAL AND MECHANICAL COLLEGE; Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma; Ohio State University; University of Southern California, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. SMACK APPAREL CO.; Wayne Curtiss, Defendants-Appellants. Board of Supervisors for Louisiana State University Agricultural and Mechanical College; Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma; Ohio State U
California Court of Appeal · 1970-12-16 · Published · cited 11× · 13 Cal. App. 3d 523; 91 Cal. Rptr. 720; 1970 Cal. App. LEXIS 1263
13 Cal.App.3d 523 (1970) 91 Cal. Rptr. 720 GREATER WESTCHESTER HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant and Respondent. Docket No. 36109. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Four. December 16, 1970. *524 COUNSEL Greenwald, Landrum
California Supreme Court · 1963-08-13 · Published · cited 154× · 384 P.2d 158; 60 Cal. 2d 276; 32 Cal. Rptr. 830; 1963 Cal. LEXIS 237; 53 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2976
60 Cal.2d 276 (1963) 384 P.2d 158 32 Cal. Rptr. 830 PROFESSIONAL FIRE FIGHTERS, INC., et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant and Respondent. Docket No. L.A. 27007. Supreme Court of California. In Bank. August 13, 1963. *278 Bodle & Fogel, George E.
California Court of Appeal · 1959-08-20 · Published · cited 42× · 173 Cal. App. 2d 137; 343 P.2d 450; 1959 Cal. App. LEXIS 1579
173 Cal.App.2d 137 (1959) ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT (a Corporation), Respondent, v. CITY OF RIVERSIDE et al., Appellants. Civ. No. 5717. California Court of Appeals. Fourth Dist. Aug. 20, 1959. Leo A. Deegan and Albert H. Ford, City Attorneys (Riverside), Harry M. Dougherty, Deputy City Attorney, Cosgrove, Cramer, Diether & Rindge, Leonard A. Diether, Gor
California Court of Appeal · 1965-03-02 · Published · cited 13× · 232 Cal. App. 2d 564; 43 Cal. Rptr. 86; 1965 Cal. App. LEXIS 1502
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 566 Defendants appeal from judgment of court without a jury, in favor of plaintiff, declaring invalid certain requirements of section 22, Santa Clara City Ordinance No. 1046,1 and enjoining their enforcement. *Page 567
California Court of Appeal · 1970-09-03 · Published · cited 2× · 11 Cal. App. 3d 49; 89 Cal. Rptr. 302; 1970 Cal. App. LEXIS 1710
11 Cal.App.3d 49 (1970) 89 Cal. Rptr. 302 ROGER DIAMOND, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, Defendant and Respondent. Docket No. 35143. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Five. September 3, 1970. *50 COUNSEL Roger Diamond, in pro. per., for Plaintif
California Court of Appeal · 1953-04-28 · Published · cited 8× · 117 Cal. App. 2d 470; 256 P.2d 393; 32 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2185; 1953 Cal. App. LEXIS 1838
117 Cal.App.2d 470 (1953) C.J. HAGGERTY, Individually and on Behalf of California State Federation of Labor, Appellant, v. COUNTY OF KINGS et al., Respondents. Civ. No. 4380. California Court of Appeals. Fourth Dist. Apr. 28, 1953. Todd & Todd, Clarence E. Todd and Henry C. Todd for Appellant. Francis Heisler, as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Appellant.
California Supreme Court · 1958-10-14 · Published · cited 44× · 50 Cal. 2d 844; 330 P.2d 778; 1958 Cal. LEXIS 199
50 Cal.2d 844 (1958) CALIFORNIA GASOLINE RETAILERS (a Nonprofit Corporation) et al., Respondents, v. REGAL PETROLEUM CORPORATION OF FRESNO, INC. (a Corporation) et al., Appellants. S. F. No. 19635. Supreme Court of California. In Bank. Oct. 14, 1958. A. E. Stebbings, C. Neil Ash, James D. Garibaldi, Frank C. Lerrigo, Eckhart A. Thompson, Martin J. Weil, Brewster
District Court, C.D. California · 2006-06-07 · Published · cited 20× · 435 F. Supp. 2d 1042; 11 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 998; 2006 WL 1663633; 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40848
435 F.Supp.2d 1042 (2006) Lynne WANG, Yu Fang Ines Kai, and Hui Jung Pao, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. CHINESE DAILY NEWS, INC., and Does 1-10, et al., Defendants. No. CV 04-1498CBM(JWJX). United States District Court, C.D. California, Western Division. June 7, 2006. *1043
California Supreme Court · 2019-07-29 · Published · cited 50× · 250 Cal. Rptr. 3d 234; 7 Cal. 5th 955; 445 P.3d 626
Opinion of the Court by Cantil-Sakauye, C.J. *961 This case is a putative class action brought on behalf of retail purchasers of an inflatable outdoor pool sold in packaging that allegedly misled buyers about the pool's size. We must decide whether the trial court abused its discretion whe