Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Pasadena Tournament of Roses Association v. City of Pasadena”
Kilgour v. City of Pasadenapublic domain
SAMUEL P. KING, Senior District Judge: Kirk Kilgour and the California Association of the Physically Handicapped, Chapter *100950 (collectively, “Kilgour”) filed this .action against the City of Pasadena, Pasadena Tournament of Roses Association, and Bull, Stockwell & Allen (collectively, “the City”) alleging violations of 29 U.S.C. § 794(b), 42 U.S.C. § 12131
Kirk Kilgour v. City Of Pasadenapublic domain
53 F.3d 1007 4 A.D. Cases 579 Kirk KILGOUR and California Association of the PhysicallyHandicapped, Chapter 50, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.CITY OF PASADENA; Pasadena Tournament of Roses Assoc.;Bull, Stockwell & Allen, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-55903. United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitt
Bresnahan v. City of Pasadenapublic domain
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 299 OPINION Mary Ann Bresnahan, Dana F. Bresnahan, Robert E. Carlson, Maureen E. Carlson, Douglas G. Ritchie (petitioners) who are taxpayers unsuccessfully sought a writ of mandate directed towards the City of Pasadena (City); Tournament of Roses Association (Association); Richard Pennack, direc
City of South Pasadena v. Slaterpublic domain
56 F.Supp.2d 1106 (1999) CITY OF SOUTH PASADENA; et al., Plaintiffs, v. Rodney E. SLATER; et al., Defendants. No. CV98-6996DDP(MANx). United States District Court, C.D. California. July 19, 1999. *1107 *1108 *1109 Joseph W. Pannone, Kane Ballmer & Berkm
Denman v. City of Pasadenapublic domain
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 771 The plaintiff sued for damages for personal injuries resulting from the collapse of a temporary wooden "grandstand" erected for the convenience of spectators at festivities known as the "Tournament of Roses," held in the City of Pasadena. Demurrers to the complaint were sustained without leave to amend. A motion f
McClain v. City of South Pasadenapublic domain
155 Cal.App.2d 423 (1957) 318 P.2d 199 SUSAN McCLAIN, a Minor, etc., Appellant, v. CITY OF SOUTH PASADENA et al., Respondents. Docket No. 22181. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three. November 22, 1957. *426 A.L. Wirin and Hugh R. Manes for Appellant. Braeme E. Gigas, City
Wright v. City of Pasadenapublic domain
McCORMICK, District Judge. By order of court and upon motion, plaintiff has filed an amended'complaint wherein she seeks to recover damages for injuries alleged to have been sustained by her on January 1, 1926, in the collapse of a reviewing grand stand erected on real property of defendant Lockwood ‘in Pasadena, Cal., and constructed by defendant Mahoney for the purpose of providing seating accommodations for the guests and vi
Anderson v. Regents of the University of Californiapublic domain
GARTZKE, P.J. Stanley W. Anderson, et al.1 appeal from an order dismissing their complaint against the Board of Regents of the University of California (UCLA) for failure to state a claim. Plaintiffs were customers of tour operators and ticket agencies with whom they contracted for tour packages to the *4761994 Rose Bowl game held on January
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 119 OPINION This is an appeal from a summary judgment granted to defendants City of Los Angeles1 and U.S. Plywood-Champion Papers, Inc. (hereafter Plywood). The summary judgment stated that it was granted "on the ground that by reason of
*1169 PREGERSON, Circuit Judge. This appeal arises from the district court’s denial of defendant-appellant Circuit City Stores, Inc.’s (Circuit City) motion to compel arbitration. Circuit City moved to compel arbitration in response to the action plaintiff-appellee Catherine In-gle filed in the Souther
Board of Supervisors for Louisiana State University Agricultural & Mechanical College v. Smack Apparel Co.public domain
550 F.3d 465 (2008) BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FOR LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY AGRICULTURAL AND MECHANICAL COLLEGE; Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma; Ohio State University; University of Southern California, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. SMACK APPAREL CO.; Wayne Curtiss, Defendants-Appellants. Board of Supervisors for Louisiana State University Agricultural and Mechanical College; Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma; Ohio State U
13 Cal.App.3d 523 (1970) 91 Cal. Rptr. 720 GREATER WESTCHESTER HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant and Respondent. Docket No. 36109. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Four. December 16, 1970. *524 COUNSEL Greenwald, Landrum
60 Cal.2d 276 (1963) 384 P.2d 158 32 Cal. Rptr. 830 PROFESSIONAL FIRE FIGHTERS, INC., et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant and Respondent. Docket No. L.A. 27007. Supreme Court of California. In Bank. August 13, 1963. *278 Bodle & Fogel, George E.
Orange County Water District v. City of Riversidepublic domain
173 Cal.App.2d 137 (1959) ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT (a Corporation), Respondent, v. CITY OF RIVERSIDE et al., Appellants. Civ. No. 5717. California Court of Appeals. Fourth Dist. Aug. 20, 1959. Leo A. Deegan and Albert H. Ford, City Attorneys (Riverside), Harry M. Dougherty, Deputy City Attorney, Cosgrove, Cramer, Diether & Rindge, Leonard A. Diether, Gor
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 566 Defendants appeal from judgment of court without a jury, in favor of plaintiff, declaring invalid certain requirements of section 22, Santa Clara City Ordinance No. 1046,1 and enjoining their enforcement. *Page 567
Diamond v. University of Southern Californiapublic domain
11 Cal.App.3d 49 (1970) 89 Cal. Rptr. 302 ROGER DIAMOND, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, Defendant and Respondent. Docket No. 35143. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Five. September 3, 1970. *50 COUNSEL Roger Diamond, in pro. per., for Plaintif
Haggerty v. County of Kingspublic domain
117 Cal.App.2d 470 (1953) C.J. HAGGERTY, Individually and on Behalf of California State Federation of Labor, Appellant, v. COUNTY OF KINGS et al., Respondents. Civ. No. 4380. California Court of Appeals. Fourth Dist. Apr. 28, 1953. Todd & Todd, Clarence E. Todd and Henry C. Todd for Appellant. Francis Heisler, as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Appellant.
50 Cal.2d 844 (1958) CALIFORNIA GASOLINE RETAILERS (a Nonprofit Corporation) et al., Respondents, v. REGAL PETROLEUM CORPORATION OF FRESNO, INC. (a Corporation) et al., Appellants. S. F. No. 19635. Supreme Court of California. In Bank. Oct. 14, 1958. A. E. Stebbings, C. Neil Ash, James D. Garibaldi, Frank C. Lerrigo, Eckhart A. Thompson, Martin J. Weil, Brewster
Wang v. Chinese Daily News, Inc.public domain
435 F.Supp.2d 1042 (2006) Lynne WANG, Yu Fang Ines Kai, and Hui Jung Pao, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. CHINESE DAILY NEWS, INC., and Does 1-10, et al., Defendants. No. CV 04-1498CBM(JWJX). United States District Court, C.D. California, Western Division. June 7, 2006. *1043
Noel v. Thrifty Payless, Inc.public domain
Opinion of the Court by Cantil-Sakauye, C.J. *961 This case is a putative class action brought on behalf of retail purchasers of an inflatable outdoor pool sold in packaging that allegedly misled buyers about the pool's size. We must decide whether the trial court abused its discretion whe