Cases

BENTON, Circuit Judge. Benton police officer Kyle Ellison shot and killed 17-year-old Keagan Schweikle. His parents, Piper Partridge and Dominic Schweikle, sued Ellison, the Chief of Police, and the City of Benton under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Arkansas law. The

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA OWEN PARTRIDGE, : : Plaintiff, : Civil Action No.: 17-0248 (RC) : v. : Re Document Nos.: 7, 10, 15, 27

RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge *7I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Owen Partridge brought this action, which seeks to recover unpaid wages against American Hospital Management Company, LLC ("LLC"); American Hospital Management Company, LMT ("LMT"); and Randall D. Arlett, who is President, Chief Executive Officer, and Manag

790 So.2d 1280 (2001) Benjamin PARTRIDGE, Appellant, v. Margaret PARTRIDGE, Appellee. No. 4D00-4685. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. August 15, 2001. *1281 Wayne R. McDonough of Wayne R. Mc-Donough, P.A., Vero Beach, for appellant. William F. Gallese, Port St. Lucie, for appellee. SILVERMAN, SC

PER CURIAM. In a thorough opinion, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas held that the asserted claims of the two patents at issue in this litigation, U.S. Pat. No. 5,809,125 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,812,-650, are anticipated by prior art and therefore are invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b). We affirm for the reasons stated in the district court’s opinion. No purpose would be served by simply

512 F.Supp.2d 626 (2007) John R. GAMMINO, Plaintiff, v. SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE, L.P. and SWBT Texas, LLC, Defendants. Civil Action No. 3:05-CV-0850-K. United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division. March 23, 2007. *627 *628 *629 Michael G.

172 Ga. App. 466 (1984) 323 S.E.2d 676 PARTRIDGE v. SOUTHEASTERN FIDELITY INSURANCE COMPANY. 68550. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Decided October 29, 1984. Richard E. Miley, for appellant. David B. Bell, for appellee. BENHAM, Judge. The pertinent facts in this case are undisputed. Appellant's husband was an o

757 S.W.2d 937 (1988) 296 Ark. 458 J.C. BELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee. No. CR 86-180. Supreme Court of Arkansas. October 10, 1988. *938 Sandra Tucker Partridge, Benton, for appellant. David B. Eberhard, Asst. Atty. Gen., Little Rock, for appellee. PURTLE, Justice. The

Bell, J., dissenting. My inability to agree with the majority herein results from a difference of opinion in tbe interpretation of tbe rights of tbe executors under tbe partnership agreements. *508In my opinion, the executors do have an option to elect not to remain in the partnerships after the death of the father. And if such option is exercised (withi

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Circuit Court of Covington County in favor of the plaintiff, Mrs. Eddie Lee Partridge, and against the defendants, Alabama Electric Co-Op, Inc.; Employers Mutual Liability Company of Wausau, Wisconsin, a corporation; and Don Taylor. The complaint alleges trespass and invasion of the right of privacy. The jury found for the plaintiff and against all defendants and assessed the damages at Five Thousand and no/100 Dollars ($5,000.00). Judgment fol

Plaintiff (appellee) filed an action in the circuit court of Covington County, Alabama, against Alabama Electric Co-Operative, Inc., a corporation, Covington Electric Co-Operative, Inc., a corporation, and James Leroy Williams. There were two counts in the complaint. Count One was *Page 254 for simple negligence; and count two was a wanton count. After the court overruled demurrers, defendants (appellants) pled the general issue in short by

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Jefferson County (Hugh A. Gilbert, J.), dated December 7, 2009 in a personal injury action. The order, among other things, granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint. It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously modified on the law by denying those parts of defendant’s motion seeking summary judgment dismissing the Labor Law § 240 (

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 233 CA 10-00034 PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, LINDLEY, GREEN, AND MARTOCHE, JJ. JEFFREY J. PITTS AND BRENDA L. PITTS, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER BELL CONSTRUCTORS, INC., ALSO KNOWN AS BELL CONSTRUCTORS OF ROCHESTER, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. GOLDBERG SEGALLA LLP, SYRACUSE (SANDRA J. SABOURIN OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-APPE

257 Ind. 81 (1971) 272 N.E.2d 448 SARAH PARTRIDGE v. HUGH PARTRIDGE. No. 1270S293. Supreme Court of Indiana. Filed August 30, 1971. *82 Ralph Hamill, Thomas J. Carroll, Hamill, Price & Carroll, of Indianapolis, for appellant. Henry J. Price, Jon D. Noland, Barnes, Hickam, Pantzer &

725 So.2d 836 (1998) Frederick BELL v. STATE of Mississippi. No. 93-DP-00189-SCT. Supreme Court of Mississippi. June 25, 1998. As Modified December 14, 1998. Rehearing Denied December 17, 1998. *840 Leland H. Jones, III, Greenwood, Attorney for Appellant. Michael C. Moore, Attorney General

Bell, J. 1. Allegations in a petition for certiorari not verified by the answer of the magistrate are not to be taken as admitted, and present nothing for determination either by the superior court or the appellate court. The allegations are not so verified when the answer is either silent in reference thereto, or expressly denies them. Landrum v. Moss, 1 Ga. App. 216 (57 S. E. 965) ; Little v

WISDOM, Circuit Judge: The question this case presents is whether the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment imposes a duty upon the state to protect prisoners (here detainees) from themselves. The parents of Michael Wayne Partridge brought suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1982) against the City of Houston, its police department, and various persons wi

LYNCH, Circuit Judge. This is an appeal from a decision decer-tifying a class action brought by and on behalf of wireless phone customers of Cellular One, the doing-business name of Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems, Inc. The putative class members are Massachusetts and New Hampshire residents who were charged for incoming calls despite having signed a standard form contract, used

The facts in this controversy are undisputed, and are substantially as follows: Mary Partridge, the plaintiff, is a full-blood Creek, enrolled opposite No. 6417. October 20, 1903, she received as a part of her allotment the land in controversy. On April 9, 1907, she filed a verified petition with the Commissioner to the Five Civilized Tribes alleging she desired to take advantage of the provision of the act of Congress approved March 3, 1903, and be authorized to sell a portion of her allotme

WISDOM, Circuit Judge: The plaintiffs/appellants, Ralph and Betty Partridge, assert a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 arising from the suicide of their son, Michael, while he was a pretrial detainee in a municipal jail in Houston, Texas.1 We withdrew our initial opinion,2 and now substitute this opinion restating our reasons for reversing and remanding this case to the