Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS MARK W. BENNETT, District Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND ..................................1117 A. Factual And Legal Allegations.......................................1117 B. The Countg’s Claims................................

469 B.R. 393 (2012) In re Fred BERROUET, Debtor. Fred Berrouet, Movant, v. BAC Home Loan Servicing, Respondent. No. 11-58010-MGD. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division. March 26, 2012. *394 Dorna Jenkins Taylor, Taylor And Associates, LLC, Atlanta, GA, for Debtor. ORDER DENYING DEBT

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 24-1350 DAHUA TECHNOLOGY USA, INC., Plaintiff, Appellant, v. FENG ZHANG, Defendant, Appellee. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. Indira Talwani, U.S. District Judge]

426 B.R. 728 (2010) In re William H. McLEMORE, Jr., Debtor. No. 07-33720. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton. March 30, 2010. *730 John N. Zomoida, Jr., Youngstown, OH, for American Tax Funding LLC. Harold Jarnicki, Lebanon, OH, for Debtor. Amended Decision

The petitioner, a resident and taxpayer of Bennington, Vermont, brings this proceeding under section 27, Part I, of No. 17, Acts of 1931, known as the Income and Franchise Tax Law, seeking relief from the rulings of the tax commissioner fixing the amount of his income tax for the year 1931. The real basis of the petition is the alleged unconstitutionality of the act referred to. The case was heard by the county court within and for the county of Washington, Bicknell, J., presiding, a

83 Wn.2d 275 (1974) 517 P.2d 911 WILLIAM J. FRITZ et al., Appellants, v. SLADE GORTON et al., Respondents. WARREN SIMMONS et al., Respondents, v. SLADE GORTON et al., Appellants. Nos. 42870, 42901. The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc. January 4, 1974. *277 Davis, Wright, Todd, Riese & J

Respondent instituted this action to secure a reduction of taxes upon certain mining claims owned by him, located in Ferry county, alleging in his complaint that, for the year 1923, if assessed according to the provisions of ch. 124, Laws of 1921, p. 401, the assessed value of the properties would have been $3,135 only; while the county officials, in defiance of the act of 1921, had arbitrarily, fraudulently and against his protest, fixed the assessed valuation at the sum of $15,000. A tender

Spring, J.: The defendant’s railroad extends from Avon, in the State of Hew York, to Jersey City, H. J. The defendant received from the plaintiff at Avon two carloads of potatoes; one February 2, 1899, which reached Jersey City on February fifth, and the other was received February fourth, arriving at Jersey City on-the sixth. These carloads were-to be transported to Palmer’s dock, Brooklyn, which is reached by lighters from defe

Plaintiffs seek to enjoin the defendants from levying *Page 283 taxes to pay certain warrants and bonds issued by Brightwood Independent School District No. 1 in Richland County. Plaintiffs allege that this school district is organized under the "provisions of a special act of Dakota Territory," which provided for a board of education with power to levy taxes not to exceed "two cents on the dollar of valuation of the taxable property of said Distri

HUNGER, District Judge. This is an appeal from an order granting a temporary injunction. The plaintiff below was a corporation doing business at Lawton, Old., as a refiner of crude petroleum oils. The defendant was a railway company doing business in Oklahoma, and having connection with plaintiff’s refinery by means of a switch track. The parties will be referred to as the refining company and the railway company. The order of

POLLEY, J. This appeal is. from an order granting a new trial. Respondent, a resident of Vermillion, in this state, shipped a -car load of apples billed to himself from Chillicothe, Mo., to Fargo, N. D. When the apples were delivered to him at Fargo, they were found to be in a heated and damaged condition, and this action is brought to recover the-loss suffered by respondent because of the damage to the apples.

Woodward, J.: This action was brought to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by the plaintiff by falling into a hole in one of the highways of the defendant village, and the defendant demurs to the complaint, alleging that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, in that the complaint shows upon its face that the plaintiff did not file with the clerk of the village, w