Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Parks v. Mashburn”
Gorton v. Mashburnpublic domain
¶ 1 The present cause's resolution requires delineation of the ambit of protection afforded to property owners by 12 O.S. 1991 § 1091 — the ten-year statute of repose for design or construction defects in completed improvements.2 I FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY ¶ 2 John Gorton [appellant3</
Vaughan v. Mashburnpublic domain
HUDSON, Justice. **429 Here we are asked to decide whether a medical malpractice plaintiff may amend a timely filed complaint to cure a defective Rule 9(j) certification after the statute of limitations has run, when the expert review required by Rule 9(j) occurred before the filing of the
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS 444444444444 NO . 10-0451 444444444444 NATURAL GAS PIPELINE COMPANY OF AMERICA, PETITIONER, v. WILLIAM JUSTISS, DARLENE JUSTISS, JOSEPH JUSTISS, TOMMY ALSPAUGH, JUDY ALSPAUGH, JOE DENTON MASHBURN, CHRISTINE MASHBURN, JOE DONALD MASHBURN, AND JUDY MASHBUR
Mendoza v. Mashburnpublic domain
747 So.2d 1159 (1999) Jesse A. MENDOZA v. Michael G. MASHBURN, et al. Sean Michael Schneider v. Michael G. Mashburn, et al. Nos. 99-CA-499, 99-CA-500. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fifth Circuit. November 10, 1999. Rehearing Denied December 6, 1999. Writ Denied February 18, 2000. *1162
Mashburn v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd.public domain
55 F.Supp.2d 1367 (1999) In re the Complaint of ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES, LTD., as owner of the unnamed 1996 Sea-Doo GTS 60HP Vessels, Serial-Numbers ZZNC6638D696 and ZZNC6626D696, for Exoneration from or Limitation of Liability. Barbara Mashburn, Claimant/Counter-Plaintiff, v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd., and Mark Hommen, Counter-Defendants. No. 97-2543-CIV. United States District Court, S.D. Flo
Mashburn v. Statepublic domain
186 Ga. App. 488 (1988) 367 S.E.2d 881 MASHBURN v. THE STATE. 75978. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Decided March 18, 1988. Thomas R. Moran, for appellant. Robert E. Wilson, District Attorney, John H. Petrey, Lanie Pryles, Assistant District Attorneys, for appellee. POPE, Judge. Defendant Darryl F. Mashburn br
United States v. Parkspublic domain
WARLICK, District Judge. This is a civil action brought by the United States of America against the defendants to quiet title to certain lands located in Madison County, North Carolina, and to enjoin the defendants from committing trespass on the said lands. In addition, the plaintiff asks for damages in the amount of $295.02, with interest, as payment for timber allegedly cut from the lands of the plaintiff by the defendant
Mashburn v. Collinpublic domain
355 So.2d 879 (1977) Donald James MASHBURN, d/b/a Maison de Mashburn v. Richard H. COLLIN et al. No. 59466. Supreme Court of Louisiana. December 13, 1977. *881 Garic K. Barranger, Barranger, Barranger, Jones & Fussell, Covington, Mack Barham, Lemle, Kelleher, Kohlmeyer & Matthews, New Orleans, for defendant-applicant.
Mashburn Trucking & Storage Co. v. City of Fairfieldpublic domain
OPINION This is an appeal by defendant Mashburn from $1000 judgment rendered against it in favor of plaintiff City in a negligence case. Plaintiff City sued defendant Mashburn alleging its driver negligent in parking a heavily loaded truck on the City's lightly paved parking area, causing destruction and damage to the asphalt paving. Trial was to a jury which found: 1) Defendant's driver parked defendant's truck in front of the courth
Mashburn v. Ne-Hi Bottling Co.public domain
*142Opinion on Petition to Rehear. Gailor, Justice. Petition to rehear has been filed which complains of certain statements of fact in onr former opinion : (1) It is insisted that petitioner’s head was crushed by a tractor, and not as we stated, by a track. This is a workmen’s compensation case and it is immaterial whether the machine was a
Dees v. Statepublic domain
NOTICE: This opinion is subject to modification resulting from motions for reconsideration under Supreme Court Rule 27, the Court’s reconsideration, and editorial revisions by the Reporter of Decisions. The version of the opinion published in the Advance Sheets for the Georgia Reports, designated as the “Final Copy,” will replace any prior version on the Court’s website and docket. A bound volume of the Georgia Reports will contain the final and official text of the opinion. In the Sup
Tracey Hollingsworth v. Lonely Creek Kennelspublic domain
Cite as 2024 Ark. App. 406 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION II No. CV-23-415 Opinion Delivered September 4, 2024 TRACEY HOLLINGSWORTH APPEAL FROM THE MADISON APPELLANT COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT
Richardson v. Statepublic domain
7 So.3d 549 (2009) Jermaine RICHARDSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 5D07-3503. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. February 13, 2009. Rehearing Denied April 27, 2009. William R. Ponall and Michael J. Snure, of Kirkconnell, Lindsey, Snure and Yates, P.A., Winter Park, for Appellant. Bill McCollum, Attorney Ge
Gross v. Hale-Halsell Co.public domain
554 F.3d 870 (2009) Dale GROSS; James Bagwill; Laveta Barker; Billy Barnes; Jim Bennett; Roy Bergeron; Kenneth Bevenue; Cody Calico; Helen Capehart; Alma Cheshewalla; Raymond Cody; O W Collins; Chris Couch; Samuel Dobson; Gina Doss; Jason Drake; Allen Farrier; Kelly Fetzer; Eugene Fitzpatrick; Billy Gambling; Eros Garcia; Christopher Green; Wade Green; Mikey Grider; James Grisham; Tim Hansen; Darrin Hargis; Anthony Hayes; Paul Henry; Mark Hicks; Rhonda H
WELLS v. STATEpublic domain
SUMMARY OPINION . LUMPKIN, VICE PRESIDING JUDGE: ¶ 1 Appellant, Darren Lee Wells, entered a plea of no contest on August 7, 2013, in OHahoma County District Court Case No. CF-2012-1322, to one count, Count 3, of Making Lewd or Indecent Proposal to Minor Under Sixteen in violation of 21 O.S.2011, § 1123(A).
SABRINA ROBERTSON AND * NO. 2020-CA-0605 WALTER ROBERTSON * COURT OF APPEAL VERSUS * FOURTH CIRCUIT THE KEARNEY COMPANIES, INC. * STATE OF LOUISIANA *
STATE v. SILASpublic domain
STATE v. SILAS Skip to Main Content Accessibility Statement Help Contact Us e-
Leader National Insurance v. Shawpublic domain
901 F.Supp. 316 (1995) LEADER NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. Bobby Austin SHAW, Personal representative of the Estate of Anthony Shaw, deceased; Bobby Austin Shaw, individually and as next of kin of Jessica Shaw, deceased; Estelle Shaw, individually and as next of kin of Jessica Shaw, deceased; Elia Herren, individually and as next of kin of Minnie Shaw and Jessica Shaw, each deceased; James Kearby; David Seely, individually and as par
Davis v. Statepublic domain
658 S.E.2d 788 (2008) DAVIS v. The STATE. No. A07A2037. Court of Appeals of Georgia. March 4, 2008. *789 Robert Greenwald, for Appellant. Gerald N. Blaney Jr., Solicitor-General, Mihae Park, Rosanna M. Szabo, Asst. Solicitor-General, Lawrenceville, for Appellee. ADAMS, Judge. James Alan Davis, who was convict
Gray v. Nussbeck (In re Gray)public domain
*872ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND ORDERING DEFENDANT TO SHOW CAUSE Robert D. Berger, United States Bankruptcy Judge Section 524 of the Bankruptcy Code is the backbone of an honest but unfortunate debtor’s fresh start.1 It operates as an injunction against the commencement or continuation of any action to