Cases

JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs sued various local government defendants (“Defendants”), claiming unjust enrichment and seeking disgorgement of traffic fines Plaintiffs allege were imposed in violation of Florida law. Defendants moved to dismiss the claim, asserting sovereign immunity. The district court denied Defendants’ motion to dismiss, and Defendants now appeal. After a careful review of

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Tonia Parker and Monroe Parker, Jr., appeal the district court’s order granting the Defendants’ motion to remand the case to state court. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d) (2006), “[a]n order remanding a case to the State court from which it was removed [under 28 U.S.C

192 S.W.3d 801 (2006) Alisha Kalee PARKER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 01-05-00453-CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (1st Dist.). April 6, 2006. *803 Ted Doebbler, Houston, for Appellant. Kelly Ann Smith, Assistant District Attorney, Charles A. Rosenthal, Jr., District Attorney-Harris County, Houst

327 S.E.2d 308 (1985) Warren BRIGGS and wife, Gloria Briggs v. John ROSENTHAL and the Sun Publishing Co., Inc. No. 8415SC497. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. April 2, 1985. *310 Alexander & Associates by Sydenham B. Alexander, Jr. and H. William Miller, Jr., Chapel Hill, for plaintiffs-appellants. Smith, Patterson,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JOSEPH SELLERS, JR., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 16-2428 (TJK) ANTHEM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This case is a cautionary tale about contract negotiations and a monument to Murphy’s Law. Plaintiffs Joseph

Motion for Rehearing Granted in Part; Motion for En Banc Reconsideration Denied as Moot; Memorandum Opinion of June 18, 2020, Withdrawn; Reversed in Part, Affirmed in Part, and Substitute Majority Opinion and Concurring and Dissenting Opinion filed December 29, 2020. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-18-00216-CV JOE ALFRED IZEN, JR., Appellant

123 Cal.Rptr.2d 19 (2002) 28 Cal.4th 811 50 P.3d 733 Raul WILSON et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. PARKER, COVERT & CHIDESTER et al., Defendants and Respondents. Raul Wilson et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. Mark Williams, Defendant and Respondent. Raul Wilson et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. Carl Axup et al., Defendants and Respondents. No. S09

CARL R. GAERTNER, Judge. Plaintiff appeals from an adverse judgment entered on a jury verdict for defendant in her breach of contract claim. We reverse and remand. Plaintiff is the widow of Morris Rosen-thal, an attorney who died on July 6, 1978. By virtue of Letters of Refusal issued by the Probate Court of the City of St. Louis on September 1, 1978, she became the successor in interest to Mr. Rosenthal’

Case No. 04-14-00483-CV ROWLAND J. MARTIN TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS Appellant v. FOR THE FOURTH DISTRICT EDWARD BRAVENEC AND 1216 WEST AVE. INC. Appellees BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS u^ APPELLANT'S SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION FOR REHEARIN

PER CURIAM: Rosenthal & Rosenthal Inc. and Broadway 41st Street Realty Corporation appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Motley, C.J.), 605 F.Supp. 612, dismissing their complaint against appellees, New York State Urban Development Corporation, et al., for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Appellants, lessee and owner of the Rosen

605 F.Supp. 612 (1985) ROSENTHAL & ROSENTHAL INC. and Broadway 41st Street Realty Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. The NEW YORK STATE URBAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION; the Times Square Redevelopment Corporation; William J. Stern as Chairman and President of both the Urban Development Corporation and the Times Square Redevelopment Corporation; Mario M. Cuomo as Governor of the State of New York; the City of New York; Edward I. Koch as Mayor of the Cit

771 F.2d 44 ROSENTHAL & ROSENTHAL INC. and Broadway 41st Street RealtyCorporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.The NEW YORK STATE URBAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION; the TimesSquare Redevelopment Corporation; William J. Stern, asChairman and President of both the Urban DevelopmentCorporation and the Times Square Redevelopment Corporation;the City of New York; Edward I. Koch, as Mayor of the Cityof New York; Park Tower

506 So.2d 675 (1987) STATE of Louisiana v. Roger J. PARKER. STATE of Louisiana v. David R. TELL. Nos. 86-KA-690, 86-KA-691. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fifth Circuit. April 13, 1987. Rehearing Denied May 18, 1987. *677 John M. Mamoulides, Dist. Atty., Dorothy Pendergast, Asst. Dist. Atty., Gretna, f

399 So.2d 24 (1981) The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Norman PARKER, Jr., Appellee. No. 80-345. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. May 19, 1981. *26 Janet Reno, State Atty. and Arthur Joel Berger, Asst. State Atty., for appellant. Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Bruce A. Rosenthal, Asst. Public

KRAVITCH, Circuit Judge: A large marijuana importation conspiracy that spanned more than four years and allegedly involved at least twenty attempts to transport marijuana by small aircraft from Jamaica into south Florida forms the basis of this appeal. Some of these alleged “loads” were charged, others were not. The “hub” of the conspiracy was appellant Stanford Champion (Stan

ACCEPTED 04-14-00354-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

MR. JUSTICE DRUCKER delivered the opinion of the court. Five separate appeals are taken from a summary judgment construing the will of Moise Dreyfus (hereinafter referred to as “testator”). Testator was survived by his widow (Carolyn) and two children (Philip S. Dreyfus and Marie-Louise Rosenthal). In his will testator bequeathed specific sums to vario

This is an appeal by Ralph G. Plummer, one of the defendants below, from a decree of the Circuit Court No. 2, of Baltimore City, enjoining him from enforcing collection of a judgment obtained in the People's Court of Baltimore City against the appellee, Earl Rosenthal, and directing that the judgment be stricken from the record and the case reopened for trial upon its merits. The judgment was rendered on June 10th, 1938, by default, in the sum of $93.49, for damages alleged sustained o

ROBB, Circuit Judge, concurring in part, dissenting in part: I. I agree that the antitrust claims must be dismissed. They are frivolous. The Supreme Court has held that the antitrust statutes do not apply to a restraint imposed by the state acting as sovereign. Parker v. Brown, 317 U.S. 341, 352, 63 S.Ct. 307, 314, 87 L.Ed. 315 (1943); Bates v.

The question presented by this appeal is whether an inheritance tax is due the state for the privilege of acquiring by will certain of the property left by Joseph M. Rosenthal at his death. The deceased was a resident of the city of New Orleans and a citizen of the state of Louisiana. He died testate on March 23, 1926, while temporarily absent on a visit to Switzerland. His will was written in New Orleans. Some of the property bequeathed by him consisted of 85 bonds of the city of New