Cases

Appeal from an order and judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of defendants, entered September 7, 1978 in Fulton County, upon a decision of the court at a Trial Term, without a jury. On March 24, 1977, plaintiff entered into an agreement with defendant Laurence Ben-Shmuel to purchase a number of items of automotive supplies and equipment, including a 1960 Mack dump truck, and a Nashbord wrecker unit which was to be removed from a pickup truck owned by defe

************************************************ The “officially released” date that appears near the beginning of an opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it is released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for the filing of postopin- ion motions and petitions for certification is the “offi- cially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical cor

NOTICE: All slip opinions and orders are subject to formal revision and are superseded by the advance sheets and bound volumes of the Official Reports. If you find a typographical error or other formal error, please notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Judicial Court, John Adams Courthouse, 1 Pemberton Square, Suite 2500, Boston, MA, 02108-1750; (617) 557- 1030; SJCReporter@sjc.state.ma.us SJC-12294 GRAND MANOR CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION & others 1 vs. CI

Case: 21-1638 Document: 59 Page: 1 Filed: 10/07/2021 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ KANNUU PTY LTD., Plaintiff-Appellant v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., Defendants-Appellees ______________________ 2021-1638 ______________________

OPINION QUIST, District Judge. Defendants-Appellants Jerry D. Kerley and Jeffrey Whaley were convicted following a jury trial in the Eastern District of Tennessee of conspiracy to commit wire *333 fraud affecting a financial institution and bank fraud, wire fraud affecting a

125 F.3d 31 134 Lab.Cas. P 33,580, 4 Wage & Hour Cas.2d(BNA) 108 James Edwin CLOSE, James R. Collins, Lawrence G. Clare,William G. Hastback, Richard T. Lepkowski, Patricia E.O'Connor, James V. Bradley, Gerard C. Letendre, EdwardWoltmann, Gerard E. Black, Ruben F. Enriquez, Robert C.Knizek, Karen C. Ore, Vincent Rapacciuolo, WilliamToffenetti, Joshua Weiss, Edgar J. Robinson, Elton JayDie

OPINION OF THE COURT Bernard J. Malone, Jr., J. This is a special proceeding brought pursuant to the Election Law seeking a declaration of illegal conduct on the part of the respondents and an order directing the return of contributions. The petitioners are five enrolled voters in Albany County as follows: Michael A. Avella is the Treasurer of the New York Republican State Committee; S

OPINION AND ORDER GREGORY L. FROST, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the motion for summary judgment of Defendants Licking County, Ohio and Dr. Robert Raker (the “Licking County Defendants”) on Plaintiff Virginia LeFever’s claims. (Case No. 2:11-cv-935, ECF No. 96.)1 Also before the Court are Virginia LeFever’s combined memorandum in opposition to

State of New York OPINION Court of Appeals This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. No. 90 In the Matter of Anthony S. Hoffmann, et al., Respondents, v. New York State Independent Redistricting Commission, et al., Respondents, Independent Redistricting Commissioner Ross Brad

****************************************************** The ‘‘officially released’’ date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the ‘‘officially released’’ date appearing in the opinion. In no event will any such motions be accepted before the ‘‘o

SIXTH DIVISION March 30, 2007 No. 1-05-0157 FARID SWEILEM and KHALIL SWEILEM, ) Appeal from the ) Circuit Court Petitioners-Appellants, ) of Cook County. ) v. ) Nos. 01 L 51089 and ) 01 L 51090 ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,

OPINION S. THOMAS ANDERSON, District Judge. Raymond M. Pfeil and Michael Kammer, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, allege that State Street Bank and Trust breached its fiduciary duty under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”). State Street was the fiduciary for the two primary retirement plans offered by General Motor

SHELDON, J. The intervening defendants Jeffrey W. Strouse, Barbara M. Strouse, Mukesh H. Shah, Vibhavary M. Shah, Jai R. Singh, Sonali Singh, Dennis J. McEniry, and Joanne McEniry appeal from the judgment of the Superior Court sustaining in part the appeal of the plaintiffs, St. Joseph's High School, Inc. (school), and the Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp. (diocese), from the dec

865 N.E.2d 459 (2007) Farid SWEILEM and Khalil Sweilem, Petitioners-Appellants, v. ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Illinois Department of Revenue Board of Appeals; and Director of the Illinois Department of Revenue, Respondents-Appellees. No. 1-05-0157. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Sixth Division. March 30, 2007. *461

JUSTICE MORAN delivered the opinion of the court: This appeal originates from John W. Flynn’s (plaintiff’s) action in the Cook County circuit court, where he sought an accounting, and his former law partner, Erwin Cohn (defendant), filed a counterclaim, after the dissolution of their two-partner law firm of Cohn & Flynn (pa

ALTIMARI, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs-appellants appeal from an order entered on August 19, 1996 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York (McAvoy, J.) dismissing plaintiffs-appellants’ claims for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1). Today, we join our sister circuits in considering: (1) whether after the Supreme Court’s decision in

Opinion ZARELLA, J. In this certified appeal, we must determine whether the Appellate Court properly affirmed the trial court’s dismissal of the plaintiffs appeal from the decision of the defendant, the planning and zoning commission of the town of Plainville (commission), to deny the plaintiffs application for the removal of sand and gravel from its property. We conclude that it did and, accordingly

Dupont, C. J., dissenting. I respectfully dissent from the result reached by the court in this case for two reasons. I conclude that under the express language of § 10.02.01 of the Middlefield zoning regulations, the commission could not deny the plaintiffs application for a special permit solely on the basis of a claimed failure to meet the general considerations enumerated in that section, and that the holdings of Cameo Park

JUSTICE BUCKLEY delivered the opinion of the court: Plaintiff, Musa Sweis, filed a complaint for a temporary restraining order, preliminary injunction, and permanent injunction against defendants, Roger Sweet, the Director of the Illinois Department of Revenue (Director), and the Illinois Department of Revenue (Department), to prevent the Department from collecting a tax penalty it

581 N.E.2d 30 (1991) 220 Ill. App.3d 393 163 Ill.Dec. 79 John W. FLYNN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Erwin COHN and Cohn & Flynn, a partnership, Defendants-Appellants. No. 1-89-3322. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Fifth Division. September 20, 1991. Rehearing Denied November 19, 1991.