⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Parish Troy Elliott”

Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2018-04-25 · Published · cited 3× · 245 So. 3d 1252
KEATY, Judge. Plaintiff/Appellant, Dorothy Baheth, on behalf of her minor child, appeals the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendant/Appellee, Lafayette Parish School Board. For the following reasons, the trial court's judgment is affirmed. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY In this personal injury matter, the minor child, Sharntii "Darius" Baheth (Darius), allegedly
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999-03-24 · Published · cited 41× · 171 F.3d 398; 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 4871; 1999 WL 155928
OPINION RALPH B. GUY, JR., Circuit Judge. Plaintiff, Mount Elliott Cemetery Association, appeals from the entry of summary judgment in favor of defendant, the City of Troy (City), in this action to challenge the City Council’s refusal to rezone certain property for use as a Catholic cemetery. Plaintiff alleges that the denial of the zoning request violat
Deshotels v. Whitepublic domain
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2017-08-16 · Published · cited 15× · 226 So. 3d 1211; 2016 La.App. 1 Cir. 0889; 2017 La. App. LEXIS 1497; 2017 WL 3530300
McClendon, j. |2The defendants appeal a judgment awarding civil penalties to the plaintiff where the trial court determined that the defendants “arbitrarily and capriciously” failed to produce the documents sought through a public records request. For the following reasons, we amend the judgment and affirm as amended. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY On Friday, February 6, 2015, Michae
Powell v. Statepublic domain
Supreme Court of Georgia · 2019-10-21 · Published · cited 15× · 307 Ga. 96
307 Ga. 96 FINAL COPY S19A0721. POWELL v. THE STATE. ELLINGTON, Justice. Appellant Kenneth N. Powell was tried before a Dougherty County jury and convicted of malice murder in the shooting death of Lionel Turner.1 Appellant contends that the evidence was insufficient to sustain his conviction, that the trial court erred in 1 Turner was killed on June 19, 1993. On August 26, 1993, Appellant and Donny C. Mimbs were jointly indicted by a Dougherty Coun
State v. Sumlinpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997-01-08 · Published · cited 2× · 480 S.E.2d 260; 224 Ga. App. 205
480 S.E.2d 260 (1997) 224 Ga. App. 205 The STATE v. SUMLIN. SUMLIN v. The STATE. Nos. A96A1958, A96A1959. Court of Appeals of Georgia. January 8, 1997. *261 Jerry Rylee, Solicitor, Inez G. D'Entremont, Assistant Solicitor, for appellant. Troy R. Millikan, Gainesville, for appellee. <
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015-08-25 · Published · cited 1× · 799 F.3d 259; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 14955; 2015 WL 5010799
FUENTES, Circuit Judge, dissenting. In response to Christie I, where we held that New Jersey’s 2012 Sports Wagering Law (“2012 Law”) violated PASPA, the New Jersey Legislature passed the 2014 Law. In addition to repealing the 2012 Law in full, the 2014 Law also repealed all prohibitions on sports wagering and any rules authorizing the State to, among other things, license or authorize a person to enga
Lacy v. Daltonpublic domain
Missouri Court of Appeals · 1991-02-13 · Published · cited 0× · 803 S.W.2d 664; 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 231; 1991 WL 15429
CRANE, Judge. Relator Barbara Lee Lacy [wife] seeks a writ of prohibition prohibiting the respondents, Hon. Fred Rush and Hon. David A. Dalton, from proceeding with the underlying garnishment and execution and directing Judge David Dalton to vacate his October 22, 1990 order in which he set aside a previous judgment of another circuit judge. We have issued our preliminary writ and now make it permanent. W
Utah Supreme Court · 1935-08-10 · Published · cited 10× · 47 P.2d 1054; 87 Utah 15; 1935 Utah LEXIS 23
This action is brought by the plaintiffs to secure the cancellation of 4,000 shares of stock of the defendant Troy Laundry Company, a corporation, issued under the direction of the defendants Albert Van Cott, F.J. Balli, and William Lake, as directors of that corporation, to the defendant J.S. Van Cott. The gist of plaintiff's complaint is that the three defendants, in violation of their trust and duties as directors, issued the 4,000 shares of stock to the defendant J.S. Van Cott for
District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2002-03-26 · Published · cited 4× · 197 F. Supp. 2d 833; 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6574; 2002 WL 550408
197 F.Supp.2d 833 (2002) Joseph RAIMONDO and Janet Raimondo, Plaintiffs, v. VILLAGE OF ARMADA, Macomb County Sheriff Department, County of Macomb, Township of Clinton, Wade Trim, Armada Police Department, Community Planning and Management, P.C., Stan S.G. Woodhouse, Jeffrey A. Bahorski, Norman Farver, Stephen Clark, David Coenen, Terrence Rooney, Patricia Magor, Ben Delecke, Rodin Caruss, Larry Cunningham, Shane Diehl, Roy Kinch, John King, Jerry
Michigan Court of Appeals · 2004-09-29 · Published · cited 24× · 687 N.W.2d 850; 263 Mich. App. 152
687 N.W.2d 850 (2004) 263 Mich. App. 152 MCA FINANCIAL CORPORATION, MCA Mortgage Corporation, Mortgage Corporation of America and Rimco Realty and Mortgage Company, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. GRANT THORNTON, L.L.P., and Doeren Mayhew & Company, P.C., Defendants-Appellees. Docket No. 244972. Court of Appeals of Michigan. Submitted July 20, 2004, at Det
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017-05-26 · Published · cited 10× · 857 F.3d 1101; 2017 WL 2296875
PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge. Unable to win the consent of all necessary landowners, a public utility company now contends that it has a statutory right to condemn a right-of-way on two parcels of land in New Mexico. Because federal law does not permit condemnation of tribal land, the Navajo Nation’s ownership of undivided fractional interests in the parcels presents a problem for th
District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1996-06-26 · Published · cited 12× · 931 F. Supp. 1345; 1996 WL 363089
931 F.Supp. 1345 (1996) Tad NELSON, Beverly Nelson and David Nelson,[1] Plaintiffs, v. ALMONT COMMUNITY SCHOOLS, Almont High School, Jean Schohl, James Jenuwine and Steven Zott, Jointly and Severally, Defendants. No. 95-71438-DT. United States District Court, E.D. of Michigan, Southern Division. June 26, 1996. *1346
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2003-02-19 · Published · cited 6× · 846 So. 2d 813; 2003 WL 355627
846 So.2d 813 (2003) Murphy J. EWING and Gwendolyn T. Ewing, et al. v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., et al. No. 02-918. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. February 19, 2003. *814 Gerolyn P. Roussel, Perry J. Roussel, Jr., Jules K. Boudreaux, Roussel & Roussel, LaPlace, LA, for Gwendolyn T. Ewing, Wilson Ewing, T
Court of Appeals of Texas · 2017-07-07 · Published · cited 14× · 528 S.W.3d 708
OPINION Opinion by Justice Moseley “In 2008, oil and gas companies descended on east Texas ... seeking to acquire leases to exploit the Haynesville Shale formation, which they viewed as having enormous potential.”1 During this frenzied period, Chesapeake Louisiana, L.P, (Chesapeake), entered into a letter agreement with Buffco Production, Inc. (Buffco), and Tw
Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2001-04-03 · Published · cited 76× · 783 So. 2d 1251; 2001 La. LEXIS 1026; 2001 WL 316005
783 So.2d 1251 (2001) Robert BOURGEOIS, et al. v. A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., et al. No. 2000-CA-1528. Supreme Court of Louisiana. April 3, 2001. Rehearing Denied May 4, 2001. *1252 Robert E. Caraway, III, Kenan S. Rand, Jr., Wendy K. Lappenga, Plauche, *1253 Maselli, Landry
Appellate Court of Illinois · 1977-06-29 · Published · cited 0× · 50 Ill. App. 3d 690; 365 N.E.2d 733; 8 Ill. Dec. 495; 1977 Ill. App. LEXIS 3005
Mr. JUSTICE JIGANTI delivered the opinion of the court: This is an action brought by the North Maine Fire Protection District, a municipal corporation (the District), and four individual taxpayers, seeking a declaratory judgment declaring section 20 of “An Act in relation to fire prevention districts” (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1965, ch. 127½, par. 21 et seq.) to be unconstitutional, a
Coleman v. Safflepublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989-03-06 · Published · cited 1× · 869 F.2d 1377; 1989 WL 17707
LOGAN, Circuit Judge. Petitioner, Charles Troy Coleman, is under a sentence of death as a result of an Oklahoma state court conviction for first-degree murder. In this, his second federal petition for habeas corpus relief, Coleman argues that this court must vacate his death sentence because of the following alleged constitutional errors: (1) the sentencing jury found one of five aggravating circumstances was present — tha
Capel v. Langfordpublic domain
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1999-04-28 · Published · cited 7× · 734 So. 2d 835; 1999 WL 252735
734 So.2d 835 (1999) David CAPEL, et al., Plaintiffs— Appellants, v. Dr. Donald LANGFORD, Defendant— Appellee. No. 98-1517. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. April 28, 1999. Rehearings Denied June 9 and June 15, 1999. *837 Keitha Anne Leonard, Lafayette, R. Ray Orrill, Jr., Robert F. Shearman, New Orle
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2008-02-22 · Published · cited 46× · 980 So. 2d 68; 2008 WL 482702
980 So.2d 68 (2008) Michelle M. DUFRENE v. GAUTREAU FAMILY, LLC, Gulf South Management, Inc. and Lafayette Insurance Company. Michelle M. Dufrene v. Gautreau Family LLC, Gulf South Managment, Inc. and Lafayette Insurance Company. Nos. 07-CA-467, 07-CA-547. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fifth Circuit. February 22, 2008. *72</
Potter v. Pattersonpublic domain
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1997-03-19 · Published · cited 1× · 690 So. 2d 1118; 96 La.App. 4 Cir. 1172; 1997 La. App. LEXIS 576; 1997 WL 126319
hARMSTRONG, Judge. This case involves a mistaken voluntary dismissal with prejudice of an entire personal injury action despite the fact that only one of several defendants had settled with the plaintiffs. The trial court ruled that the mistaken judgment is a nullity. We find that the mistaken judgment could have and should have been set aside upon the plaintiffs’ motion for new trial and we need not reach the question of