⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Pamela Joy Smith”

Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler) · 2013-07-31 · Published · cited 0×
NO. 12-12-00322-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS PAMELA JOY DOOLEY, § APPEAL FROM THE 7TH APPELLANT V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE § SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989-04-24 · Published · cited 19× · 870 F.2d 975; 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 5429; 1989 WL 31494
PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge: Tammy Jean Brown sued several defendants under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and pendent state law theories in order to recover damages for false arrest, false imprisonment, and two strip searches. Two defendants, Pam Byer and the City of Euless, settled. A jury found defendant Bob Bracken liable under both § 1983 and state law, and found defendants
Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2021-06-01 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2019-CA-01178-COA RICHARD STOWE, JOY BARRET STOWE, APPELLANTS LINDA DAVIS, GEOFFREY SCHEELE, AND MARGARET SCHEELE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS HOMEOWNERS IN OAKMONT SUBDIVISION v. LARRY W. EDWARDS, PAMELA B. EDWARDS, APPELLEES AND EDWARDS HOMES INC. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 03/07/2019 TRIAL JUD
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2007-05-30 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs February 6, 2007 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. LEAH JOY WARD Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County No. 03-04434 James C. Beasley, Jr., Judge No. W2005-02802-CCA-R3-CD - Filed May 30, 2007 The defendant, Leah Joy Ward, was found guilty by a jury of first degr
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994-04-21 · Published · cited 6× · 19 F.3d 557; 28 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 741; 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 8344; 1994 WL 112849
PER CURIAM: I. Introduction Harry A. Bendiburg sued various state employees and private health care providers under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) for civil rights violations and for common law battery. 1 His claims arose out of the medical treatment of his son, Carl A. Bendiburg. The
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017-11-16 · Published · cited 51× · 875 F.3d 746
OPINION OF THE COURT McKEE, Circuit Judge. We are asked to consider the viability of two potential defenses to an alleged False Claims Act violation that arise in the context of the Medicare Part D Program: the government knowledge inference, which can defeat a finding of scienter in certain circumstances,
Supreme Court of Iowa · 2017-06-02 · Published · cited 46× · 896 N.W.2d 393; 2017 WL 2390664; 2017 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 62
WATERMAN, Justice. This appeal presents a question of first impression under Iowa law: whether the parents of a child born with severe disabilities may bring a medical negligence action based on the physicians’ failure to inform them of prenatal test results showing a congenital defect that would have led them to terminate the pregnancy. This is known as a wrongful-birth claim. Other jurisdictions are divided as to the paren
West Virginia Supreme Court · 1983-12-15 · Published · cited 28× · 310 S.E.2d 835; 172 W. Va. 769
310 S.E.2d 835 (1983) Tim CLINE, et al. v. JOY MFG. CO. et al., Defendants Below, Jumacris Mining Co. (Two cases). Nos. 15649, 15660. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. September 29, 1983. Dissenting Opinion December 15, 1983. Rehearing Denied December 15, 1983. *836 William L. Jacobs
District Court, S.D. New York · 2017-05-04 · Published · cited 32× · 252 F. Supp. 3d 289; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71520
MEMORANDUM & ORDER DEBORAH A. BATTS, United States District Judge. The instant action was filed by Grant Phillips and Scott Phillips (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) on May 9, 2016, against Citibank N.A. (“Citibank”), Neal Dorman, individually and in his representative capacity (“Dornpan”), Ira Schapiro, in his representative capacity (“Schapiro”), Lightstone Acquisitions III, LLC, LSG 365 Bond Street LLC,
California Court of Appeal · 2001-07-31 · Published · cited 7× · 110 Cal. Rptr. 2d 101; 91 Cal. App. 4th 129; 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6498; 2001 Daily Journal DAR 7963; 2001 Cal. App. LEXIS 604
110 Cal.Rptr.2d 101 (2001) 91 Cal.App.4th 129 GLENDALE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL & HEALTH CENTER et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH, Defendant and Respondent; County of Los Angeles, Real Party in Interest and Appellant. No. B127829. Court of Appeal, Second District, Division One. July 31, 2001.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2022-06-06 · Published · cited 0× · 2022 OK 53
IN THE MATTER OF THE SUSPENSION OF MEMBERS OF THE OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION2022 OK 53Case Number: SCBD-7260Decided: 06/06/2022THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA Cite as: 2022 OK 53, __ P.3d __ FOR PUBLICATION IN OBJ ONLY. NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION. IN THE MATTER
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2022-12-08 · Published · cited 0×
IN RE: MEDICAL REVIEW * NO. 2022-C-0707 PANEL PROCEEDING OF TRAVIS PORCHE (D), PCF * FILE NO. 2021-00615 COURT OF APPEAL * FOURTH CIRCUIT * STATE OF LOUISIANA ******* APPLICATION FOR WRITS DIREC
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2025-04-07 · Published · cited 0×
THOMAS ANDERSON, ET AL * NO. 2025-C-0075 VERSUS * COURT OF APPEAL CITY OF NEW ORLEANS, ET * AL FOURTH CIRCUIT * STATE OF LOUISIANA ******* ON SUPERVISORY WRIT FROM THE
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015-01-29 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA SCOTT PHILLIP HENRETTY, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Appellant, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED v. CASE NO. 1D14-590 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _____________________________/ Opinion filed January 29,
Supreme Court of Iowa · 2017-06-02 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 15–0974 Filed June 2, 2017 Amended August 8, 2017 PAMELA PLOWMAN and JEREMY PLOWMAN, Appellants, vs. FORT MADISON COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, PIL KANG, JOHN PAIVA, DAVIS RADIOLOGY, P.C., LEAH STEFFENSMEIER, THE WOMEN’S CENTER, and FORT MADISON PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS, Appellees. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Lee (North) County, Joh
District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1995-09-25 · Published · cited 6× · 903 F. Supp. 1151; 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19837; 67 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,922; 70 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 291; 1995 WL 662353
903 F.Supp. 1151 (1995) Yvette Renae WINSTON, Plaintiff v. HARDEE'S FOOD SYSTEMS, INC. and Ernie Williams, Defendants. Civ. A. No. 95-CV-53-BG(R). United States District Court, W.D. Kentucky, Bowling Green Division. September 25, 1995. David F. Broderick and Pamela Carolyn Bratcher of Broderick, Thornton & Pierce, Bowling Green, KY, for Plaintiff Yvette Renae Wi
Hardison v. Statepublic domain
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014-05-14 · Published · cited 1× · 138 So. 3d 1130; 2014 WL 1921734; 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 7171
MARSTILLER, J. Angelo Hardison appeals his conviction and sentence for second-degree murder, arguing the trial court committed fundamental error in instructing the jury on justifiable use of deadly force. He asserts the standard instruction given on justifiable use of deadly force was fundamentally erroneous. Specifically, he argues the instruction is inconsistent with current law because it effectively makes the defense a
Henretty v. Statepublic domain
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015-01-29 · Published · cited 3× · 155 So. 3d 1254; 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 1053; 2015 WL 376226
PER CURIAM. Scott Phillip Henretty appeals his conviction and sentence, arguing that fundamental error occurred when the trial court failed to renew the offer of counsel prior to Henretty entering his plea and failed to renew the offer prior to the imposition of sentence. Pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.111(d)(5), if a waiver of counsel is accepted at any stage of the proceedings, the trial court shall renew
Motes v. Myerspublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987-02-20 · Published · cited 6× · 810 F.2d 1055
CLARK, Circuit Judge: This case involves a dispute over title to an air conditioner. On its surface, the lawsuit seems trivial and lacking in federal jurisdiction. Underneath lurks the question of whether plaintiff Motes was deprived of her constitutional right of liberty without due process of law and whether 42 U.S.C. § 1983 affords her relief and federal jurisdiction of her claim. Belinda Joy Motes sued Sergeant James R
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2023-01-17 · Published · cited 4× · 57 F.4th 426
USCA4 Appeal: 21-1848 Doc: 39 Filed: 01/17/2023 Pg: 1 of 10 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-1848 ELIZABETH POLAK, individually and on behalf of persons similarly situated, Plaintiff - Appellant, and DEBRA TRENT; NI