Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Pamela Jean Johnson”
State v. Johnsonpublic domain
31 Kan.App. 2d 687 (2003) 71 P.3d 481 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. PAMELA JEAN JOHNSON, Appellant. No. 88,609 Court of Appeals of Kansas Opinion filed June 27, 2003. Kathryn B. Wall, assistant appellate defender, for appellant. Daryl E. Hawkins, assistant county attorney, and Carla J. Stovall, attorney general, fo
Johnson v. Statepublic domain
70 So.3d 739 (2011) Samuel JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 5D10-3300. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. September 23, 2011. Samuel E. Johnson, Wewahitchka, pro se. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Bonnie Jean Parrish, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee. PER CURIAM.
Johnson v. Statepublic domain
PER CURIAM. The petition for belated appeal is granted. A copy of this opinion shall be filed with the trial court and be treated as the notice of appeal from his judgment and sentence in Case No. 05-2002-CF-49008-A, in the Circuit Court in and for Brevard County, Florida. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(c)(6)(D). PETITION GRANTED. GRIFFIN, SAWAYA and COHEN, JJ., concur.
Johnson v. Colvinpublic domain
DECISION AND ORDER VICTOR E. BIANCHINI, United States Magistrate Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Kenneth Johnson I applied for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) *1266Benefits and Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”) under the Social Security Act in December of 2008 and July of 2009, respectively. The Commissioner of So
State v. Johnsonpublic domain
*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr
Romey v. Johnsonpublic domain
ORDER PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from trial court’s order of modification of child custody. Judgment Affirmed. 84.16(b).
Johnson v. Statepublic domain
PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. Flagg v. State, 74 So.3d 138 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011). TORPY, EVANDER and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.
Noye v. Johnson & Johnsonpublic domain
III. DISCUSSION A. Equitable Estoppel and Whether a Non-Signatory May Compel Arbitration A non-signatory to an arbitration agreement may bind a signatory to that agreement in certain circumstances under the theory of equitable estoppel. See, e.g., Dwayne E. Williams, Binding Nonsignatories to Arbitration Agreements, 25-SPG FRANCHISE L.J. 175, 178 (2006) ("Equitable estoppe
Johnson v. O'NEILLpublic domain
461 N.W.2d 507 (1990) Pamela Jean JOHNSON, Petitioner, Respondent, v. Dean Dwayne O'NEILL, Appellant. No. C3-90-317. Court of Appeals of Minnesota. October 23, 1990. Bradford Colbert, St. Paul, for appellant. Gary M. Peterson, Faribault, for respondent. Considered and decided by LANSING, P.J. and SCHUMACHER and MULALLY,[*] JJ.
Teague v. Johnson & Johnsonpublic domain
FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 11, 2014 Elisabeth A. Shumaker FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT Clerk of Court VICKIE SCHMIDT PARSON; PATRICIA SCALES;
Jean Robert Saint-Jean v. Emigrant Mortg. Co., Inc.public domain
22-3094-cv Jean Robert Saint-Jean et al. v. Emigrant Mortg. Co., Inc. et al. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2023 (Argued: February 14, 2024 Decided: February 19, 2025) Docket No. 22-3094-cv JEAN ROBERT SAINT-JEAN, EDITH SAINT-JEAN, FELEX SAINTIL, LINDA COMM
United States v. Pamela Baughpublic domain
187 F.3d 1037 (9th Cir. 1999) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.PAMELA BAUGH; BENIJAMIN BEAR; ALAN BEIM; LOU BORDISSO; MARIA BRANN; MARY JANE BRINTON; JESSE BROWN; KENNETH BUTIGAN; FAYE BUTLER; CHRISTIE CANNON; JEAN CATHER; ROBERT CHAMBERLIN; GLORIA CHANNON; NORMAN CHASE; JAMES CORDER; ROBERT COX; DOUGLAS DONLEY; SILE DOOLEY;JENNIFER DUNLAP; WILLIAM EPSEN;ARLA ERTZ; JOHN FAY; FOREST,AKA Gretchen Milne; BERNIE GALVIN; MARGARET G
10/11/2017 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs May 1, 2017 WILLIAM AUGUST LOCKLER, III V. PAMELA MICHELLE BARR LOCKLER Appeal from the Circuit Court for Washington County No. 24931 J. Eddie Lauderback, Judge
United States v. Pamela Jean Ganttpublic domain
ORDER The opinion filed June 7, 1999, slip op. 5781 and appearing at 179 F.3d 782 (9th Cir.1999), is amended as follows: 1. At slip. op. 5785, 179 F.3d at 784, in the fourth sentence of the first paragraph of Part I, change “Federal Public Defender” to “Public Defender”. 2. At slip op. 5794-5797, 179 F.3d at 789-91, replace Part V of the o
Ashann-Ra v. Johnsonpublic domain
PER CURIAM. Ashann-Ra appeals the district court’s order denying his free exercise claim filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially on the reasoning of the district court. See Ashann-Ra v. Johnson, No. CA-02-927-7 (W.D.Va. Aug. 22, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately prese
Pamela Jean Thomas v. Robert Lester Thomas, Jr.public domain
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-96-00116-CV Pamela Jean Thomas, Appellant v. Robert Lester Thomas, Jr., Appellee
State v. Johnsonpublic domain
CONNER, J. The State appeals the trial court’s post-trial order granting Johnson’s motion for judgment of acquittal as to a trafficking in cocaine charge, after a jury returned a verdict finding Johnson guilty of the trafficking offense, as well as fleeing and eluding. On appeal, the State argues that it provided sufficient evidence to show that Johnson had dominion and control over the cocaine, the factor upon which the trial c
Woodie v. Colvinpublic domain
MEMORANDUM & ORDER WILLIAM G. YOUNG, DISTRICT JUDGE I. INTRODUCTION This is an action by Pamela J. Woodie (‘Woodie”) appealing the final decision of the Acting Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner”) determining that she is not disabled and therefore not entitled to Social Security .disability benefits. This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). '
TROTT, Circuit Judge: Appellants Elmar Lee Pettit, his spouse Audrey Jean Pettit, and North Bay Plumbing, a corporation wholly owned by the Pettits (collectively “Pettits” or “Appellants”), appeal from a decision of the district court. The court reversed the bankruptcy court’s determination that ap-pellees- — Bay Area Pipe Trades Health & Welfare Trust Fund, Bay Area Trades Pension Trust Fund, Northern California Pipe
80 F.Supp.2d 1127 (2000) VERNON JOHNSON FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, et al., Plaintiff, v. BANK ONE TEXAS, N.A., et al., Defendant. No. C99-0913L. United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Seattle. January 7, 2000. *1128 *1129 Norman K. Short, Norman Morley Short, P.S., Silverdale, WA,