Cases

PER CURIAM. *1297We affirm the order entered by the circuit court in Case No. 2017-100954-CFDL denying Appellant's Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion for postconviction relief filed in that case, albeit not for the reasons provided by the court. We do so without prejudice to Appellant timely raising in Case No. 2007-000909-CFAWS

MARSTILLER, J. Bernard Parks (“Appellant”), a sex offender, appeals the denial of his dispositive motion to dismiss an information charging him with failing to notify authorities that he had changed or vacated his permanent residence, a requirement for all sex offenders under section 943.0435(4), Florida Statutes. Appellant argues that the State did not make a prima facie showing that he violated the statute because the undisp

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 16-1624 ___________________________ Tracey K. Kuehl, an individual; Lisa K. Kuehl, an individual; Kris A. Bell; Nancy A. Harvey, an individual; John T. Braumann, an individual; Animal Legal Defense Fund, a non-profit corporation llllllll

PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. TORPY, BERGER and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur.

956 A.2d 545 (2008) 2008 VT 65 In re Leonard PARKS. No. 07-049. Supreme Court of Vermont. May 9, 2008. *547 Matthew F. Valerio, Defender General, and Seth E. Lipschutz, Prisoners' Rights Office, Montpelier, for Petitioner-Appellant. Thomas Donovan, Jr., Chittenden County State's Attorney, and Pamela Hall Jo

EDWARDS, J. Jose Pamblanco (“Appellant”) appeals the partial denial of his motion seeking postconviction relief. Though Appellant’s motion raised numerous issues, only one issue merits discussion. Appellant asserts that his convictions and sentences for both (1) traveling to meet a minor for an unlawful sexual act and (2) solicitation of a minor via a device capable of electroni

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Walter B. Tolub, J.), entered November 21, 2008, which granted plaintiff landlord’s motion for an order compelling defendant tenant to provide plaintiff with access to the kitchen and basement of the premises with certain limitations so as to allow plaintiff to perform necessary remedial work, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of striking that portion of the order indicating that it is a final dispositi

216 P.3d 292 (2008) 2008 OK CIV APP 112 NEW DOMINION, L.L.C., Applicant/Appellee, v. PARKS FAMILY COMPANY, L.L.C., Respondent/Appellant. No. 105,309. Released for Publication by Order of the Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 3. Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 3. September 18, 2008. Certiorari Denied Decemb

Kirsch, Judge. *855 [1] Pamela Webb ("Webb") appeals the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of City of Carmel ("Carmel"), Carmel Clay Parks Building Corporation ("the Corporation"), and Carmel/Clay Board of Parks & Recreation ("the Park Board") (collectively, "the Appellees

OPINION SCHULTZ, Judge.* Relators Stephen C. Sipper, Dale 0. Thar-alson, and Henry R. Krueger challenge the determination of the Commissioner of Veterans Affairs (the Commissioner) that relators’ Veterans Preference Act (VPA) claims are barred by the six-year statute of limitations for statute-based causes of action. We affirm. FACTS Sip

SUAREZ, J. Givanni Parks appeals from the trial court's denial of a post-conviction petition styled as a petition for habeas corpus. We conclude that the trial court properly denied the appellant's petition for writ of habeas corpus as it consisted solely of arguments made by him in prior unsuccessful post-conviction motions. Appellant raises two arguments: that his sentence is illegal and he did not violate his plea agreement. This

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed August 1, 2018. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D18-796 Lower Tribunal No. 96-38947 ________________ Givanni Parks,

EN BANC MORRIS, Judge. Robin Quintín Parks appeals the order denying his motion to correct illegal sentence filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We reverse because the postconviction court erroneously found that Parks’ challenge to a sentence beyond the maximum allowable for his offenses, which was imposed as part of a negotiated plea agr

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed October 3, 2018. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D16-2041 Lower Tribunal No. 10-6731 ________________ Michael Parks, Appel

Gobeil, Judge. *799In this appeal and cross-appeal, the State appeals from the Superior Court of Gilmer County's order granting Daniel Franklin Parks a new criminal trial (Case No. A19A0491). Specifically, the State contends that, in granting the motion for a new trial, the lower

Cite as 2023 Ark. App. 504 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION I No. CV-22-618 DANNY HOPPER Opinion Delivered November 1, 2023 APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE CRAWFORD COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT V.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 19-1980 Filed August 4, 2021 TRACEY K. KUEHL, LISA K. KUEHL, PAMELA J. JONES and HALEY A. ANDERSON, Plaintiffs-Appellees. vs. PAMELA SELLNER, TOM SELLNER, CRICKET HOLLOW ZOO, INC. AND PAMELA J. SELLNER TOM J. SELLNER, AN IOWA GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, D/B/A CRICKET HOLLOW ZOO, Defendants-Appellants. ________________________________________________________________

PER CURIAM. We dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Givanni Torrell Parks filed a motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, and his motion was denied on September 19, 2012. The denial order was served on Parks by mail on September 21, 2012. Parks had fifteen days under Rule 3.850(h), plus three days for mailing under Rule 3.070, or until October 9, 2012, to file a motion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED TOM HENRY PARKS, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D18-1557 STATE OF FLORIDA,

Modified and Affirmed and Opinion Filed October 31, 2024 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-23-00091-CR PAMELA JOHNSON, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 4 Dallas Cou