Cases

[Cite as State v. Palmer, 2022-Ohio-2955.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 110992 v. : RICHARD PALMER, JR., :

[Cite as State v. Palmer, 2019-Ohio-5163.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF MEDINA ) STATE OF OHIO C.A. No. 18CA0075-M Appellee v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE THEODORE W. PALMER

OPINION PRO, District Judge. Walter Palmer (“Palmer”) appeals the ruling of the bankruptcy court in granting an exemption from discharge to the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) for the tax debts listed in Schedule E of his Chapter 7 Petition. Palmer filed his Opening Brief (# 110) on June 17, 1997. Appellees (hereinafter the “IRS”) filed an Answering Brief (# 111) on July 2, 1997. Palmer filed

CANBY, Circuit Judge: The question before us is whether a fraud determination by the Tax Court, which resulted from a petitioner’s failure to controvert the Commissioner’s allegations of fraud and otherwise to participate in the proceedings, collaterally estops that petitioner from contesting the fraud in a subsequent bankruptcy proceeding. We hold that it does not, because the

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BARBARA W. PALMER, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 22-cv-2876 (CRC) FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION The Federal Election Commission (“FEC”) unanimously dismissed a complaint filed by Texas attorney Barbara W.

Filed 4/17/23 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE ASHLEE ELIZABETH PALMER, Plaintiff and Appellant, G060880 v. (Super. Ct. No. 30-2017-00938646) CITY OF ANAHEIM, OPINION

REVERSED AND REMANDED ¶ 1 Plaintiff/Appellant, State of Oklahoma, ex rel. Department of Human Services (DHS), Child Support Enforcement Division (CSED), seeks review of the district court's order which reversed an administrative ruling and directed the return of seized funds to Defendant/Appellee, Jayson Palmer (Palmer), in a child support enforcement action. DHS asserts the district court erred as a matter of fact and law. ¶ 2 Palmer received the money by virtue of th

OPINION COLE, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-Appellant James Curtis Palmer, a Chapter 7 debtor in bankruptcy, appeals the decision of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit (“BAP”), which reversed the bankruptcy court’s holding that Palmer’s 1991 and 1992 tax debts are dischargeable. See Palmer v. Internal Revenue Serv. (In re Palmer)

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS State of West Virginia, FILED Plaintiff Below, Respondent November 8, 2019 EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK vs.) No. 18-0206 (Summers County 15-F-50) SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS

ORDER MARK W. BENNETT, U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE, NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA On May 25, 2016, I entered an order directing the parties to show cause why the court should not retain expert wit*974nesses in the above captioned case, (docket no. 91). On June 3, 2016, the defendants filed their show cause response/objections, (docket-

926 N.E.2d 127 (2010) In re the ESTATE OF Forrest W. QUACKENBUSH, Deceased. Carol R. Bean, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Forrest W. Quackenbush, Appellant, v. Indiana Department of State Revenue, Inheritance Tax Division, Appellee. No. 49T10-0810-TA-61. Tax Court of Indiana. April 22, 2010. John L. Walkey, Cheryl M. Knodle, Ball Eggleston PC, Lafay

OPINION AND ORDER RAYMOND P. MOORE, United States District Judge On the last day of 2015, appellants Rich-ard William Palmer (“Mr. Palmer”) and Dar Mae Palmer (collectively, “appel-lants”) appealed the decision of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Colo-rado ("the Bankruptcy Court”), granting appellee the U.S, Trustee’s (“the UST” or “appellee”) Motion to Dismiss Debtors’ Case Under 11 U.S.C. §

ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS Howard R. Tallman, Judge, United States Bankruptcy Court This case comes before the Court on the United States Trustee’s Motion to Dismiss under 11 U.S.C. §§ 707(b)(1) and 707(b)(2) or, in the alternative, § 707(b)(3), filed on October 31, 2014 (docket # 15) (the “Motion”), and Debtors’ Response filed on November 26, 2014 (docket # 19). The hearing in this matter, origin

MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be FILED regarded as precedent or cited before any Oct 30 2020, 12:29 pm court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK the defense of res judicata, collateral Indiana Supreme Court

O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge: We must decide whether the Internal Revenue Service made proper deficiency determinations and assessments for unpaid taxes against non-cooperative taxpayers. I Paul and Angela Palmer failed to file tax returns from which their income could be determined for the years 1976 through 1979. Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) agents attempted to meet with the Pa

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3287-22 KEONA PALMER, DUANE ST. AMOUR, ANA ST. AMOUR, BRIAN ROWARD, JENNY ROWARD, JUDITH JONES, NIGUEL FIGUERO, OTILIO M. SEDA, JR., CARMEN SEDA, JAMES COHEN, STEPHEN BELL, SONIA LENHARDT BELL, JO-ANN WRIGHT, DENISE FRAWLEY, THOMAS FRAWLEY, B

Case: 25-40368 Document: 63-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/29/2026 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED

MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), FILED this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any Nov 08 2019, 6:05 am court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK Indiana Supreme Court the defense of res judicata, collateral

MEMORANDUM OPINION JAMES E. BOASBERG, District Judge. Plaintiff Carolyn Palmer worked in information technology for BaseTech, a subcontractor for IBM, which, in turn, contracted with the Department of Homeland Security’s Office of Customs and Border Patrol (CBP). She was removed from a CBP project in 2009 after errors were discovered in her t

TOOMEY, Judge: ¶1 Heidi Palmer asks this court to review the decision of the St. George City Council (the Appeal Board) to uphold her suspension of "five days, 40 hours, without pay" for violating the policies of the St. George Municipal Corporation (the City) and the St. George Police Department (the SGPD). 1 </