Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
13 opinions for “Painters District Council No. 58 v. Concrete Strategies, LLC”
Biro v. Condé Nastpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER J. PAUL OETKEN, District Judge: This is a diversity action for defamation and injurious falsehood. Plaintiff Peter *449Paul Biro was the subject of an article written by Defendant David Grann that appeared in the July 12-19, 2010 issue of the New Yorker magazine (the “Article”), published by Defendan
Gbur v. City of Harveypublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JEFFREY COLE, United States Magistrate Judge. Alex Gbur, a white male, was a policeman for the south suburban City of Harvey, beginning in 2001. In April 2003, Harvey elected an African-American may- or — the previous mayor had been white — • and Mr. Gbur feels it was no coincidence that his career took a turn for the worse around that time. He was disciplined on a
In Re Lipitor Antitrust Litigationpublic domain
OPINION SMITH, Chief Judge. This opinion addresses two sets of consolidated appeals concerning two pharmaceutical drugs: Lipitor and Effexor XR. In both sets of consolidated appeals, plaintiffs allege that the companies holding the patents related to Lipitor and Effexor XR fraudulently procured and enforced certain of those patents. Plaintiffs further all
International Brotherhood Elec v. Farfield Copublic domain
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _______________________ No. 20-1922 _______________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA EX REL. INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL UNION NO. 98 v. THE FARFIELD COMPANY, Appellant _______________________
International Brotherhood Elec v. Farfield Copublic domain
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _______________________ No. 20-1922 _______________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA EX REL. INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL UNION NO. 98 v. THE FARFIELD COMPANY, Appellant _______________________
Federal Trade Commission v. Arch Coal, Inc.public domain
329 F.Supp.2d 109 (2004) FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. ARCH COAL, INC., et al., Defendants. State of Missouri, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Arch Coal, Inc., et al., Defendants. Nos. CIV.A.04-0534 JDB, CIV.A.9409535 JDB. United States District Court, District of Columbia. August 16, 2004. *110
State v. Lead Industries Assoc.public domain
DECISION Before this Court are various post-trial* motions following a jury verdict against Defendants The Sherwin Williams Company (SW), NL Industries, Inc. (NL), and Millennium Holdings, LLC (Millennium).1 Also before the Court is the issue of whether and how to proceed with an abatement remedy. At trial, the jury found that the "cumu
HARRELL, J. Table of Contents ** I. Background Facts..................................474 II. The Procedural Path of the Present Case ............483 III. Appellees’ Motion to Dismiss the A
in Re: Giant Eagle, Inc.public domain
ACCEPTED 05-15-01292-CV 05-15-01292-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS
ACCEPTED 03-15-00348-CV 6616789 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
ACCEPTED 13-14-00725-cv THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 4/2/2015 10
ACCEPTED 04-14-00829-cv 04-14-00829-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXA
ACCEPTED 04-15-00469-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 9/3