Cases

894 P.2d 1200 (1995) 134 Or. App. 121 Lynne R. MACKEY, Appellant, v. TKCC, INC., a California corporation, dba Koll Construction; Koll Company, a California corporation; Petula Associates, Limited, an Iowa corporation; and Koll Woodside Associates, a California general partnership, Respondents. TKCC, INC., a California corporation, dba Koll Construction; and Petula Associates Limited, an Iowa corporation, Third-Party P

Wright, J. All parties and both lower courts have determined that the general law of premises liability governs the outcome of this case and have shaped their arguments accordingly. The question as to whether there is any evidence that First Continental acted willfully or wantonly with regard to Burnside arises only if we find that a licensor-licensee relationship existed between those parties under the law of premises liabilit

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 71 Ohio St.3d 414.] SHUMP, APPELLEE AND CROSS-APPELLANT, V. FIRST CONTINENTAL- ROBINWOOD ASSOCIATES, A.K.A. ROBINWOOD ASSOCIATES, LTD., APPELLANTS AND CROSS-APPELLEES, ET AL. [Cite as Shump v. First Continental-Robinwood Assoc., 1994-Ohio-427.] Landlords and tenants—Landlord owes tenant's guest same duty of care that landlord owes tenant. A landlord owes the same duties to persons lawf

749 P.2d 486 (1988) 113 Idaho 867 Sally MARCHER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Eloise O. BUTLER, individually, Defendant-Respondent, and David J. Flood, individually; Eloise O. Butler and David J. Flood dba Flood, Meyer, Setter & Associates; and Does I through V and XII through XXV, inclusive, Defendants. No. 16811. Supreme Court of Idaho. January 27,

ANN WALSH BRADLEY, J. ¶ 1. This case is before the court on certification from the court of appeals pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 809.61 (1997 — 98). The court of appeals asks this court to address the following question: *50Does a landlord of an older residential rental property have a common law duty to inspect, or test, for contamination from lead-

JUSTICE BUCKLEY, dissenting: I must respectfully dissent from the majority opinion in this case on the grounds that the record does not establish as a matter of undisputed fact that the defendant Chicago Housing Authority (hereinafter CHA) had no duty to see that the pipe in question was insulated at the time of the occurrence,

VANDE WALLE, Justice. Daniel Bellemare appeals from district court summary judgments dismissing his complaints against Gateway Builders, Inc. (Gateway), and Anton Rutten. We affirm. In 1979, Bellemare leased Rutten’s farmland on a crop-share basis. On October 29, 1979, Bellemare was injured when he fell from a ladder attached to a Butler grain bin on the premises. The bin had been sold to Rutten and erect