Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Pablo v. Bitter”
Astrid Matias-Pablo v. Todd Blanchepublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 25-2021 ___________________________ Astrid Lucero Matias-Pablo; E.J.E.V.M. Petitioners v. Todd Blanche, Attorney General of the United States
League of United Latin Am. Citizens v. Abbottpublic domain
LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN CITIZENS, League of United Latin American Citizens of Texas, Joseph C. Parker, Jr., Hector Flores, Sanford Levinson, Yvonne M. Davis, Mary Ramos, Gloria Ray, Guadalupe Torres, Ray Valarde, and Doris Williams, Plaintiffs, v. Gregory Wayne ABBOTT, in His Official Capacity as Governor of the State of Texas, and Rolando Pablos, in His Official Capacity as Secretary of State of the State of Texas, Defendants.
United States v. Casellas-Toropublic domain
BENTON, Circuit Judge. Pablo Casellas-Toro appeals from a final judgment of conviction, assigning as error the district court’s denials of his motions to change venue and to suppress evidence. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court reverses and remands. I. On June 17, 2012, Casellas reported he was a victim of an
Purdue Pharma L.P. v. Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc.public domain
Case: 22-1482 Document: 58 Page: 1 Filed: 11/21/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ PURDUE PHARMA L.P., PURDUE PHARMACEUTICALS L.P., Appellants v. COLLEGIUM PHARMACEUTICAL, INC., Appellee KATHERINE K. VIDAL, UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES PATE
Grissom v. Robertspublic domain
HARTZ, Circuit Judge. Richard Grissom, a prisoner in the custody of the Kansas Department of Corrections, brought suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against a number of state corrections and prison officials (collectively the Prison Officials), alleging violation
Bos v. Smithpublic domain
Justice Guzman delivered the opinion of the Court. Grandparents have a special role in the family unit and often serve as safety nets for their children and grandchildren. Lending a hand, a heart, and an ear can be especially important when loved ones are experiencing the trauma of divorce.1 But being there in times of need sometimes ensnares grandparents in bitter divorce disputes. In this tragic case,
Dc Comics v. Pacific Pictures Corporationpublic domain
OPINION REINHARDT, Circuit Judge: This case arises from the district court’s denial of defendants’ motion, pursuant to California’s anti-SLAPP statute, to strike certain of DC Comics’ state law claims. In Batzel v. Smith, 333 F.3d 1018 (9th Cir. 2003), we held that the collateral order doctrine permits a party to take an interlocut
Ruperto Hernandez Zarate v. U.S. Attorney Generalpublic domain
USCA11 Case: 20-11654 Date Filed: 02/18/2022 Page: 1 of 40 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 20-11654 ____________________ RUPERTO HERNANDEZ ZARATE, Petitioner, versus U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,
Justice BREYER delivered the opinion of the Court. The Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976 (FSIA or Act), provides, with specified exceptions, that a "foreign state shall be immune from the jurisdiction of the courts of the United States and of the States...." 28 U.S.C. § 1604
State v. Luipublic domain
Stephens, J. ¶86 (dissenting) — While the majority’s test “avoids the risk of unduly burdening the use of scientific evidence,” majority at 492, it does so only by ignoring and misreading controlling precedent, at the cost of Washington defendants’ Sixth Amendment right to confront the witnesses against them. U.S. Const, amend. VI. The majority’s misguided detour into long-settled questions leads it to conclude that laboratory rep
State v. Nicolas Subdiaz-Osoriopublic domain
DAVID T. PROSSER, J. ¶ 1. This is a review of an unpublished decision of the court of appeals, State v. Subdiaz-Osorio, No. 2010AP3016-CR, unpublished slip op. (Wis. Ct. App. Nov. 15, 2012). ¶ 2. The case involves the increasingly busy intersection between Fourth Amendment privacy considerations and the constant advancement of electronic technology. The court must determine whether law enforcement offic
State v. Luipublic domain
Fl LE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON STATE OF WASHINGTON, ) ) Respondent, ) No. 84045-8 ) V. ) En Bane ) SlONE P. LUI, )
National Ass'n for Advancement of Colored People v. North Hudson Regional Fire & Rescuepublic domain
742 F.Supp.2d 501 (2010) The NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE ("NAACP"); the Newark Branch, NAACP; the New Jersey State Conference NAACP; Allen Wallace; Lamara Wapples; and Altarik White, Plaintiffs, v. NORTH HUDSON REGIONAL FIRE & RESCUE, a body corporate and politic of the State of New Jersey, Defendant, v. Alex M. Derojas, Randy Vasquez, Carlos Castillo, Orlando Duque, Pablo Claro, Intervenor-Defendants.</
People v. Gonzalezpublic domain
44 Cal.Rptr.3d 237 (2006) 38 Cal.4th 932 135 P.3d 649 The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Jose GONZALEZ, Defendant and Appellant. No. S072946. Supreme Court of California. June 12, 2006. *241 Michael B. McPartland, Palm Desert, under appointment by the Supreme Court; and Carl G
National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. North Hudson Regional Fire & Rescuepublic domain
707 F.Supp.2d 520 (2010) The NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE ("NAACP"); the Newark Branch, NAACP; the New Jersey State Conference NAACP; Allen Wallace; Lamara Wapples; and Altarik White, Plaintiffs, v. NORTH HUDSON REGIONAL FIRE & RESCUE, a body corporate and politic of the State of New Jersey, Defendant, v. Alex M. DeRojas, Randy Vasquez, Carlos Castillo, Orlando Duque, Pablo Claro, Intervenor-Defendants.</
Pyle v. South Hadley School Committeepublic domain
824 F.Supp. 7 (1993) Jeffrey J. PYLE, et al. v. The SOUTH HADLEY SCHOOL COMMITTEE, et al. Civ. A. No. 93-30102-F. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. June 8, 1993. John Reinstein, Sarah Wunsch, Civil Liberties Union of Massachusetts, Boston, MA, William Newman, Civil Liberties Union, Northampton, MA, for plaintiffs. Raymond R. Randall, Lyon, Scull
Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL I BELKIS DÍAZ NIEVES, SONIA DÍAZ NIEVES Y ANDRÉS DÍAZ NIEVES Apelación Demandante - Apelados procedente del Tribunal de v. Primera TA2025AP00461 Instancia, Sala LUIS ROBERTO GÓMEZ de Bayamó
Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL I BELKIS DÍAZ NIEVES, SONIA DÍAZ NIEVES Y ANDRÉS DÍAZ NIEVES Apelación Demandante - Apelados procedente del Tribunal de v. Primera TA2025AP00461 Instancia, Sala LUIS ROBERTO GÓMEZ de Bayamó
Cernuda v. Heaveypublic domain
720 F.Supp. 1544 (1989) Ramon CERNUDA and Editorial Cernuda, Inc., Petitioners, v. George D. HEAVY, Regional Commission, United States Customs Service, and Department of Treasury, United States Customs Service, Respondents. No. 89-1265-Civ. United States District Court, S.D. Florida, Miami Division. September 18, 1989. *1545 Char
Chevron Corp. v. Donzigerpublic domain
OPINION LEWIS A. KAPLAN, District Judge. Editor Note: The paragraphs related to headnotes 1-105 are found on the supplemental pieces of this opinion on Westlaw. Part 1 is 2014 WL 815553; Part 2 is 2014 WL 815613; Part 3 is 2014 WL 815715; Part 4 is 2014 WL 815869 [Head-notes 1-2]; Part 5 is 2014 WL 815923 [Headnotes 3-51]; Part 6 is 2014 WL 815961 [Headnotes 52-87]; Part 7 is 2014 WL 816086 [Headnotes 88-