Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “PURKEY v. BARR”
Wesley Purkey v. United Statespublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 19-3318 WESLEY IRA PURKEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Respondents-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Wesley Purkey v. United Statespublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 19-3318 WESLEY IRA PURKEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Respondents-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Wesley Purkey v. United Statespublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 19-3318 WESLEY IRA PURKEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Respondents-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Daniel Lewis Lee v. T. J. Watsonpublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 20-2128 DANIEL LEWIS LEE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. T. J. WATSON, Warden, and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondents-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States
Daniel Lewis Lee v. T. J. Watsonpublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 20-2128 DANIEL LEWIS LEE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. T. J. WATSON, Warden, and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondents-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States
Buntion v. Lumpkinpublic domain
Case: 22-70003 Document: 00516287324 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/20/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED April 20, 2022 No.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES ) UNION, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 20-2320 (RBW) ) FEDERAL BUREAU O
Donald Middlebrooks v. Tony Parkerpublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 21a0244p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ DONALD RAY MIDDLEBROOKS, │ Plaintif
Alfred Bourgeois v. T.J. Watsonpublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 20-1891 ALFRED BOURGEOIS, Petitioner-Appellee, v. T.J. WATSON, Warden, and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondents-Appellants. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court
Alfred Bourgeois v. T.J. Watsonpublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 20-1891 ALFRED BOURGEOIS, Petitioner-Appellee, v. T.J. WATSON, Warden, and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondents-Appellants. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court
Miller v. Statepublic domain
DONALD L. CORBIN, Justice. I, This is an automatic appeal pursuant to Ark. R.App. P.-Crim. 10 (2009) from the judgment of the Sebastian County Circuit Court convicting Appellant James Aaron Miller of three counts of capital murder and sentencing him to death on each count. Jurisdiction is properly in this court pursuant to Ark. Sup.Ct. R. 1-2(a)(2) (2009). We find that no error occurred in the guilt p
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) In the Matter of the ) Federal Bureau of Prisons’ Execution ) Protocol Cases, ) ) LEAD CASE: Roane, et al. v. Barr ) Case No. 19-mc-145 (TSC) ) THIS DOCUMENT
Abbott v. Amoco Oil Co.public domain
619 N.E.2d 789 (1993) 249 Ill. App.3d 774 189 Ill.Dec. 88 Kenneth ABBOTT et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. AMOCO OIL COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. No. 2-92-1275. Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District. August 18, 1993. *791 Mark A. La Mantia, Farrell & Barr, Rosemont, for K
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) In the Matter of the ) Federal Bureau of Prisons’ Execution ) Protocol Cases, ) ) LEAD CASE: Roane, et al. v. Barr ) Case No. 19-mc-145 (TSC) ) THIS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) In the Matter of the ) Federal Bureau of Prisons’ Execution ) Protocol Cases, ) ) LEAD CASE: Roane, et al. v. Barr ) Case No. 19-mc-145 (TSC) ) THIS
State v. Addisonpublic domain
TABLE OF CONTENTS I. THE CAPITAL MURDER...................................................... 412 n. PROCEDURAL HISTORY..................................................... 414 III. PROCEDURE IN CAPITAL MURDER.................................... 417 *410IV. APPELLATE STANDARDS OF REVIEW................................ 4
Jackson v. United Statespublic domain
638 F.Supp.2d 514 (2009) Richard Allen JACKSON, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. No. Civ. 1:04CV251, 1:00CR74. United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Asheville Division. June 19, 2009. *520 M. Gordon Widenhouse, Jr., Rudolf Widenhouse & Fialko, Chapel Hill, NC, Shelagh Rebecca Kenney, Center fo
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) In the Matter of the ) Federal Bureau of Prisons’ Execution ) Protocol Cases, ) ) LEAD CASE: Roane, et al. v. Barr ) Case No. 19-mc-145 (TSC)
In re: FBOP Execution Protocol Casespublic domain
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued November 16, 2020 Decided November 18, 2020 No. 20-5329 IN RE: IN THE MATTER OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS' EXECUTION PROTOCOL CASES, JAMES H. ROANE , JR., ET AL., APPELLANTS v. WILLIAM P. BARR, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ET AL., APPELLEES Appeal from the Uni
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) In the Matter of the ) Federal Bureau of Prisons’ Execution ) Protocol Cases, ) ) LEAD CASE: Roane, et al. v. Barr ) Case No. 19-mc-145 (TSC) ) THIS