Cases

WOOD, Chief Judge. The antitrust laws prohibit competing economic actors from colluding to agree on prices, either directly or through such mechanisms as output restrictions. See United States v. Socony-Vacumn Oil Co., 310 U.S. 150, 60 S.Ct. 811, 84 L.Ed. 1129 (1940); Palmer v. BRG of Georgia, Inc., 498 U.S. 46, 111 S.Ct. 401, 112 L.Ed.2d

OPINION and ORDER GORDON, Judge: This consolidated action involves an administrative review conducted by the U.S. Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) of the antidumping duty order covering Floor-Standing, Metal-Top Ironing Tables from China. See Floor-Standing, Metal-Top Ironing Tables and Certain Parts Thereof from the People’s Republic of

DYK, Circuit Judge, dissenting, with whom Circuit Judge HUGHES, joins. I respectfully dissent from the majority’s holding that Mallinckrodt, Inc. v. Medipart, Inc., 976 F.2d 700 (Fed.Cir. 1992), and Jazz Photo Corp. v. International Trade Commission, 264 F.3d 1094 (Fed.Cir.2001), remain good law. First, I agree with the government that Mallinck-rodt was wrong

OPINION and ORDER GORDON, Judge: This consolidated action involves an administrative review conducted by the U.S. Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) of the antidumping duty order covering Floor-Standing, Metal-Top Ironing Tables from China. See Floor-Standing, Metal-Top Ironing Tables and Certain Parts Thereof from the People’s Republic of

ORDER PER CURIAM. This case was argued before a panel of three judges on March 6, 2015. The panel sua sponte requested a poll on whether to consider this case en banc in the first instance. A poll was conducted and a majority of the judges who are in regular active service voted for sua sponte en banc consideration. Accordingly,

395 B.R. 101 (2008) PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL COMPANY, Debtor. No. 08-1454-SSC. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona. September 2, 2008. *104 Margaret A. Gillespie, Theodore P. Witthoft, Collins, May, Potenza, Baran & Gillespie, Phoenix, AZ, for Debtor. Terry A. Dake, Terry A. Dake, Ltd., Phoenix, AZ, for Trustee. Re

662 F.Supp.2d 1360 (2009) HOME PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL, INC., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant. Slip Op. 09-144. Court No. 07-00123. United States Court of International Trade. December 17, 2009. *1361 Blank Rome LLP, Washington, DC (Frederick L. Ikenson, Larry Hampel), for Plaintiff Home Products International, Inc.

JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This Cause having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and Adjudged: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

(2008) HOME PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL, INC., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant. Slip Op. 08-39. Court No. 07-00123. United States Court of International Trade. April 7, 2008. OPINION AND ORDER GORDON, Judge. This consolidated action arises from the first administrative review of the antidumping duty order covering floor-standing, metal-top

JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

521 F.Supp.2d 1382 (2007) HOME PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL, INC., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant. Slip Op. 07-155, Court No. 07-00123. United States Court of International Trade. October 26, 2007. *1383 Blank Rome LLP (Frederick L. Ikenson, Larry Hampel, Roberta Kienast Daghir), Washington, DC, for Plaintiff Home Products Inte

NABERS, Chief Justice. For the second time, this Court is asked to consider whether Daniel R. Boyd, Debra C. Butler, and Bryan M. Kelley, coal miners who claim they were injured by exposure to a certain chemical while employed as coal miners and whose claims arose in Tuscaloosa County (“the Tuscaloosa plaintiffs”), may pursue their claims against 11 defendants, including Flexible Products Company and Micon Products Internati

633 F.3d 1369 (2011) HOME PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee, and Since Hardware (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd., Defendant. No. 2010-1184. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. February 7, 2011. *1371 Frederick L. Ikenson, Blank Rome LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for pla

602 F.3d 742 (2010) BDT PRODUCTS, INC.; Buro-Datentechnik GMBH & Company KG, Plaintiffs, Higgs, Fletcher & Mack, and Meisenheimer Herron & Steele, Appellant, v. LEXMARK INTERNATIONAL, INC., Defendant-Appellee. No. 08-6140. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: November 19, 2009. Decided and Filed: April 21, 2010.

402 F.Supp.2d 1261 (2005) INTERNATIONAL BEAUTY PRODUCTS, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, Plaintiff, v. Garth BEVERIDGE, an individual, Dinah Beveridge, an individual, and Mustang Enterprises, Inc., an administratively dissolved Nevada corporation, Defendants. No. 05CV00179 EWN/MJW. United States District Court, D. Colorado. December 2, 2005.

La Asociada Señora Fiol Matta emitió la opinión del Tribunal. La Regla 47 de Procedimiento Civil, 32 L.P.R.A. Ap. III, dispone que una moción de reconsideración presentada *796oportunamente, y acogida por el Tribunal de Primera Instancia, interrumpe el término para presentar un recurso de apelación o certiorari, pero es muda al efecto de la i

ORDER PER CURIAM. The International Trade Commission (“Commission”) determined that there was a violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. § 1337), in the unlawful importation, sale for importation, or sate after importation by Lucky Litter LLC (“Lucky Litter”) and OurPet’s Company (“OurPet’s”) of certain self-cleaning litter boxes and components thereof, by reaso

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 36 This petition for a writ of mandamus arises from a number of actions in which *Page 37 1,675 plaintiffs, all individuals who claim that they were injured by exposure to isocyanate1 while employed as coal miners, have sued

DISSENT; Opinion Filed January 11, 2022 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-20-00558-CV FOREVER LIVING PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL, LLC, A NEVADA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, AND ALOE VERA OF AMERICA, INC., A TEXAS CORPORATION, Appellants V. AV EUROPE GMBH, A GERMAN LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY,

REVERSE, RENDER, AND REMAND and Opinion Filed July 30, 2021 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-20-00558-CV FOREVER LIVING PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL, LLC, A NEVADA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, AND ALOE VERA OF AMERICA, INC., A TEXAS CORPORATION, Appellants V. AV EUROPE GMBH, A GERMAN LIMITED LIABILITY