Cases

MEMORANDUM DECISION ON COMPLAINT LEIF M. CLARK, Bankruptcy Judge. Factual Background The Debtor (“Ronnie Pace” or “Pace”) filed for chapter 7 on August 15, 2007. His wholly-owned company, Chaparral Resources, Inc. (“Chaparral”) had previously filed for chapter 11 in November, 2006. That case was later dismissed. Pursuant to a Default Judgment entered by this court on December 13, 2007, the

Case: 19-1319 Document: 74 Page: 1 Filed: 12/23/2020 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Appellant v. RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, Appellee ______________________ 2019-1319 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Tradem

Case: 19-1319 Document: 74 Page: 1 Filed: 12/23/2020 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Appellant v. RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, Appellee ______________________ 2019-1319 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Tradem

The opinion of the court was delivered by FUENTES, P.J.A.D. Plaintiffs John Mullen and Howard Levine own a one-family house in an area of the Borough of Point Pleasant Beach that is *88zoned exclusively for low density residential use. Plaintiffs’ residence is adjacent to the Driftwood Motel, a preexisting nonconforming use in this otherwise residential

OSTRER, J.A.D. *72This appeal involves the scope of a shareholder's right to inspect a corporation's records under N.J.S.A. 14A:5-28 and the common law. Plaintiff, a Merck & Co., Inc. shareholder, appeals from the *73dismissal of his complaint seeking vario

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2019 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

676 F.Supp.2d 352 (2009) ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. ACTAVIS ELIZABETH LLC, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Inc., Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Sandoz Inc., Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc., Apotex Inc., Aurobindo Pharma Ltd., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Synthon Laboratories, Inc., Zydus Pharmaceuticals, USA, Inc., Defendants. Civil Action No. 07-cv-3770 (DMC). United States District Court, D. Ne

19 F.Supp.2d 242 (1998) GRAND STREET ARTISTS, et. al., Plaintiffs, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, et. al., Defendants, PARKER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, et. al., Defendants. No. 96-3774 (HAA). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. August 25, 1998. *243 Philip Elberg, Medvin & Elberg, Ne

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JAMES C. FRANCIS IV, United States Magistrate Judge. This is an employment discrimination action in which the plaintiffs allege that their former employers, defendants Gold*114man, Sachs & Co. and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (collectively, “Goldman Sachs” or the “defendants”), denied them equal compensation and

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) IN RE: APPRAISAL OF DELL INC. ) C.A. No. 9322-VCL ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Date Submitted: March 2, 2016 Date Decided: May 31, 2016 Stuart M. Grant, Michael J. Barry, Christine M. Mackintosh, GRANT & EISENHOFER, P.A., Wilmington, Delaware; Counsel for Petitioners. G

(2008) Richard F. MILLER, Plaintiff, v. Philipp HOLZMANN, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 95-1231 (RCL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. August 12, 2008. MEMORANDUM OPINION ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, Chief Judge. Winston Churchill prescribed magnanimity in victory. See Winston S. Churchill, THE SECOND WORLD WAR,

Opinion And Order BLOCK, Judge. I. Introduction This case is one of the last of the Winstar-related progeny facing this court. It involves a series of contracts in which the government promised to allow the plaintiff, Anchor Savings Bank, FSB (“Anchor”) to account for “supervisory goodwill” as a capital asset that would count toward Anchor’s regulatory capital requirement and be amor

698 F.Supp. 951 (1988) NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION, Defendant. Civ. A. No. 87-0277-OG. United States District Court, District of Columbia. October 3, 1988. *952 Harold R. Henderson, Stephen C. Rogers, T. Michael Kerrine, William R. Perlik, Deanne C. Siemer, Michael L. Burac

456 B.R. 253 (2011) In re Ronnie J. PACE, Debtor. Randolph N. Osherow, Plaintiff, v. Nelson Hensley & Consolidated Fund Management, L.L.C., Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 07-52081. Adversary No. 09-05080. United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas, San Antonio Division. May 16, 2011. *259 Carol E. Jendrzey, Cox Smith Matthews

14 A.3d 573 (2010) In re DOLLAR THRIFTY SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION. Cons. C.A. No. 5458-VCS. Court of Chancery of Delaware. Submitted: August 27, 2010. Decided: September 8, 2010. *574 Jay W. Eisenhofer, Esquire, Michael J. Barry, Esquire, Stephen G. Grygiel, Esquire, Grant & Eisenhofer P.A., Wilmington, Delaware; Joel F

In the United States Court of Federal Claims Nos. 13-402, 13-917, 13-935, 13-972, 14-47, 14-93, 14-174, 14-175, 17-997 (Filed: 8 July 2026) * *************************************** ALTA WIND I OWNER LESSOR C, et al., * * Plaintiffs, * * v. * * THE UNITED STATE

ACCEPTED 03-14-00706-CV 4055487 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

NAOMI REICE BUCHWALD, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE LIBOR V I I Table of Contents I. Introduction ...457 II. General Legal Standards ...458 1. Class Certification ...458 1.1. Standing ...458 1.2. Rule 23(a) ...459

FILED 15-0541 11/3/2015 11:51:32 PM tex-7670900 SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS 15-0849

ACCEPTED 14-15-00991-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS