Cases

PARKER, Judge. Twila Powers, the plaintiff in the trial court, appeals a final judgment entered in her personal injury action on the basis that the award was inadequate as a matter of law. We reverse and find that the trial court erred in denying Powers’ motion for new trial on the issue of damages. Powers alleged that she had sustained a permanent injury to her neck and back as a result of being struck by D

555 P.2d 1235 (1976) Albert A. POWERS, Appellant, v. Shirley JOHNSON, Respondent. No. 8415. Supreme Court of Nevada. November 10, 1976. Rehearing Denied December 14, 1976. Harry A. Busscher, Reno, for appellant. Donald A. Thorpe, Reno, for respondent. OPINION PER CURIAM: On May 2, 1970, Shirley Johnson was test-

González, J. ¶1 Lawsuits must be initiated within the relevant statute of limitations. Generally, plaintiffs need to timely serve only one defendant to toll the statute of limitations on their claims. Today, we are asked whether service of process on one defendant tolls the statute of limitations as to an unserved and unnamed defendant that the plaintiff identified with a placeholder such as “John Doe.” We find that service of pro

588 December 20, 2023 No. 664 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. MARTIN ALLEN JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant. Washington County Circuit Court C011654CR; A173046 Eric Butterfield, Judge. Argued and submitted February 28, 2022. Rond Chananud

363 Argued and submitted September 15, 2022, vacated and remanded June 14, 2023 Molly SMITH, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Tina Pauline JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant. Baker County Circuit Court 21LT02316; A176787 532 P

165 S.W.3d 357 (2005) Steven Harry POWERS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. PD-1380-04. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas. June 15, 2005. *358 Abe Factor, Fort Worth, for Appellant. Kimberly Wesley, Asst. District Attorney, Fort Worth, Matthew Paul, State's Atty., Austin, for State. OPINI

[Cite as State v. Johnson, 2023-Ohio-990.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAKE COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, CASE NOS. 2022-L-067 2022-L-068 Plaintiff-Appellee, - vs - Criminal Appeals from the

[Cite as State v. Johnson, 2022-Ohio-2136.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 110904 v. : PATRICK JOHNSON, :

*567ORDER DENYING MOTION TO JOIN THIRD PARTIES LASNIK, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This matter comes before the Court on a motion to join necessary third parties (Dkt.#33) filed by defendants the City of Seattle, Seattle Chief of Police Gil Kerli-kowske, Director of the Seattle Police Department Office of Professional Accountabi

229 F.3d 1249 (9th Cir. 2000) ROBERT POWERS; PETER J. FRANKLIN; SEA BREEZE PRINTING, INC.; GARVIN D. STANISLAWSKI; STARLOG GROUP, INC.AND STARLOG GROUP, INC. DEFINED PENSION PLAN, ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED; HOWARD SOBEL; RICHARD STRAUSZ; RICHARD W. HALSEY, Plaintiffs-Appellees,WILFRED GEORGE, Class Member/Objector-Appellant,v.PAUL EICHEN; ROBERT JOHNSON; KENNETH E. OLSON; FREDERICK PARKER; MICHAEL TAMKI

192 S.W.3d 439 (2006) Christopher Todd POWERS, Appellant, v. Kee Bum PARK, M.D., and Cape Neurological Surgeons, P.C., Appellees. No. 2005-CA-000707-MR. Court of Appeals of Kentucky. April 14, 2006. *440 William R. Kenealy, Eric J. Jacobi, Clay Kenealy Wagner & Adams, PLLC, Louisville, KY, for Appellant. Andrew N. Cloo

WARDLAW, Circuit Judge: Wilfred George, an unnamed class member who failed to intervene in the proceedings below, appeals the district court’s order awarding attorneys’ fees to class counsel in the amount of thirty percent of the settlement. We hold that because George filed an objection to the fee request in the district court, he has standing to pursue this appeal. We also determine that, although the district court proper

*608Henry v. James , 264 Ga. 527, 533 (5), 449 S.E.2d 79 (1994). Judgment affirmed. Mel

U.S. Magistrate Judge, Susan E. Cox *580This case is a death action that arises under the Civil Rights Act of 1871 ( 42 U.S.C. § 1983 ). This case, filed by Marilyn Johnson on behalf of the estate of Norman Johnson, generally alleges that Norman Johnso

KERN, Justice [¶1.] Lynette Johnson, individually and on behalf of the Estate of Ronald E. Johnson (collectively Johnson), appeals from an order granting summary judgment. Ronald E. Johnson (Ronald) was a South Dakota State Penitentiary correctional officer murdered by two inmates during an escape attempt. Johnson sued the Department of Corrections (DOC) and a number of its employ

942 S.W.2d 551 (1996) Walter L. POWERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Tennessee, Appellee. Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee, at Nashville. September 30, 1996. *552 Geoffrey Coston, Nashville, for appellant. Charles W. Burson, Attorney General and Reporter, Sarah M. Branch, Assistant Attorney General, Criminal Justice Division, Victor S. (To

961 F.Supp. 233 (1997) Robert POWERS; Peter Franklin; Sea Breeze Printing, Inc.; Garvin D Stanislawski; Starlog Group, Inc. Defined Pension Plan, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. Paul EICHEN; Robert Johnson; Kenneth E. Olson; Frederick Parker; Michael Tamkin; Michael Vogt; Dennis A. Whittler; Mary Zoeller; Arthur Minich; John M. Siber; John Thomas; Jeffrey Nash; and, Proxima Corporation, Defendants.

2022 IL App (2d) 210007 No. 2-21-0007 Opinion filed March 17, 2022 ______________________________________________________________________________ IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS SECOND DISTRICT ______________________________________________________________________________ THOMAS POWERS,

*1165 Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (John E O’Donnell, J.), entered February 24, 2012. The order, among other things, distributed the parties’ personal property. It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously modified on the law by remitting the matter to Supreme Cou

ORDER TERRENCE WILLIAM BOYLE, District Judge. This cause came on for hearing before the undersigned United States District Judge on February 3, 1988. Petitioners Rivard and Power filed applications for the writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S. C. § 2254. In a memorandum dated October 15, 1987, the magistrate recommended that the respondents’ motion to dismiss the applications be granted. Petitioners