Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION SAVAGE, District Judge. As it did in earlier pharmaceutical product liability cases involving the drug Paxil that it had removed from the state court, the defendant GlaxoSmithKline, LLC ("LLC") opposes the plaintiffs’ motions to remand these cases. It challenges the determination in Brewer v. SmithKline Beacham Corp., 774 F.Supp.2d 720 (E.D.Pa. Mar.24, 2011) that, fo

658 N.W.2d 127 (2003) 468 Mich. 1 Tamara TAYLOR and Lee Anne Rintz, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant. Tamara Taylor and Lee Anne Rintz, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Gate Pharmaceuticals, Defendant-Appellant. Judith H. Robards and Kenneth W. Robards, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Gate Pharmaceuticals, Defendant-Appellant. Tamara Taylor and Lee Anne Rintz, Plaint

62 F.Supp.2d 544 (1998) BLUE CROSS OF CALIFORNIA et al., Plaintiffs, v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CLINICAL LABORATORIES, INC., Defendant. Sarah J. Clark and Ronald S. Schwartzman, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated; Plaintiffs, v. Smithkline Beecham Clinical Laboratories, Inc., Defendant. David Watkins and Mary Gallardo, Plaintiffs, v. Smithkline Beecham Clinical Laboratories, Inc., Defendant.

OPINION SHWARTZ, Circuit Judge. A.S. and Sallee Miller (“Plaintiffs”) filed suit in Pennsylvania state court against GlaxoSmithKline LLC (“GSK”) claiming that its drug, Paxil, caused birth defects. GSK removed the case to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The District Court

ORDER MICHAEL J. DAVIS, Chief Judge. The above-entitled matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois, dated May 13, 2014. [Docket No. 76] Plaintiff filed objections to the Report and Recommendation. [Docket No. 79] Pursuant to statute, the Court has conducted a de novo review upon the record. 28 U.S.C. §

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON June 22, 2016 Session ACCREDO HEALTH GROUP INC. v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC F/K/A SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION D/B/A GLAXOSMITHKLINE Appeal from the Circuit Court for Shelby County No. CT00448712 Rhynette N. Hurd, Judge ___________________________________ No. W2015-01970-COA-R9-CV – Filed

847 F.Supp. 341 (1994) John DIBIASE v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORP. Civ. A. No. 93-3171. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. March 15, 1994. *342 Richard A. Ash, Lyman and Ash, Philadelphia, PA, for John Dibiase. Alan D. Berkowitz, Dechert, Price & Rhoads, Susannah R. Goodman, Philadelphia, PA, for Smithkline

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued April 12, 2016 Decided October 11, 2016 No. 15-1177 PHH CORPORATION, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU, RESPONDENT On Petition for Review of an Order of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB File 2014-CFPB-0002)

751 F.Supp. 525 (1990) In re SMITHKLINE BECKMAN CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION. No. 88-7474. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. October 29, 1990. *526 Dianne M. Nast, Kohn, Savett, Klein & Graf, P.C., Philadelphia, Pa., Richard D. Greenfield, Judith N. Dean, Haverford, Pa., Sherrie R. Savett, Berger & Montague, P

NO. 12-01-00009-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS EXXON CORPORATION,§ APPEAL FROM THE FOURTH

NO. 12-01-00009-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS EXXON CORPORATION,§ APPEAL FROM THE FOURTH

460 F.3d 1217 In re PHENYLPROPANOLAMINE (PPA) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION,* Shantell Allen, on behalf of Allen, Vera, et al.,* Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.Bayer Corporation, et al., Defendants-Appellees.Leon Anderson, Jr., et al.,* Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.Bayer Corporation, et al., Defendants-Appellees.Leslie Ackel, et al.,* Plaintiffs-

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-99-00028-CV James Wegner, Appellant v. Dell Computer Corporation and Ken Hashman,

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN ON MOTION FOR REHEARING NO. 03-99-00028-CV

Volume 1 of 2 FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT In re: PHENYLPROPANOLAMINE (PPA)  PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION,* No. 04-35370 SHANTELL ALLEN, on behalf of Allen, Vera, et al.,*  D.C. No. MD-01-01407-BJR* P

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STRIKE CLASS ALLEGATIONS AND DENY CLASS CERTIFICATION ROTHSTEIN, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION THIS MATTER comes before the court on Defendants’ Motion to Strike Class Allegations and Deny Class Certification (“Defendants’ motion”). Having reviewed pleadings filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, along with the remainder of the record, a

Case: 25-1337 Document: 54 Page: 1 Filed: 07/30/2026 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ ILDICO INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee ______________________ 2025-1337 ______________________ Appeal from the United States

Ellington, Presiding Judge. *269 This dispute arises from a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ("NPDES") permit issued in 2015 by the Environmental Protection Division ("EPD") of the Georgia Department of Natural Resources renewing appellee Rayonier Performance Fibers, LLC's ("R

TAMILIA, J. ¶ 1 This class action suit was initiated by plaintiffs/appellants Charles R. Ashton III and Penny Starr-Ashton, Barbara and Alan Kaplan, and Lynn and Robert Powell, as parents and natural guardians of their minor children, and on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, to secure damages from the appellees, pharmaceutical companies and their successors-in-interest, for personal injuries allegedly incur

Barnett, Judge: In this action, Plaintiff, Aspects Furniture International, Inc. ("Plaintiff" or "AFI"), contests the denial of two protests 1 challenging U.S. Customs and Border Protection's ("CBP" or "Customs") allegedly untimely liquidation of ten entries associated with those protests. See genera