⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

1 opinion for “PORTO v. CAMDEN COUNTY FREEHOLDERS”

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000-08-03 · Published · cited 0× · 333 N.J. Super. 476; 755 A.2d 1236; 2000 N.J. Super. LEXIS 320
STEINBERG, J.A.D., concurring in part; dissenting in part. I agree with the conclusion of the majority that the charge imposed by the sheriff in this case is technically a tax, rather than a fee, because of the gross disproportion between the amount charged and the value of the services actually performed and expenditures actually involved, as stipulated by the parties. Indeed,