Cases

OPINION OF THE COURT WEIS, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff alleges a discriminatory discharge from employment caused by her inability to work for about two months while recuperating from surgery. The district court concluded that the complaint failed to state a claim under the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Rehabilitation Act. We agree and will affirm.

PER CURIAM: Commerzbank AG (“Commerzbank”) appealed from Judge Scheindlin’s denial of class certification and dismissal of the claims asserted by certain investors for lack of standing, including Commerzbank. In a previous decision, familiarity with which is assumed, we affirmed the district court in part and certified to the New York Court of Appeals the question of whether a re

OPINION OF THE COURT Stein, J. In this case certified to us by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, we must determine whether a reasonable factfinder could conclude that plaintiff Commerzbank AG was assigned the right to bring a common-law fraud claim, and therefore had standing to sue various defendants involved in the issuance of rated notes by the Cheyne structured investment vehicle

OPINION BY JUDGE SIMPSON This appeal involves review of an employer’s notice of workers’ compensation benefit offset against an employee’s pension benefits. David C. Harrison (Claimant) petitions for review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) affirming an order of Workers’ Compensation Judge Pamela Briston (WCJ) denying his review offset, reinstatement and penalty petitions

289 F.Supp.2d 639 (2003) Samir M. MOUSSA, M.D., Plaintiff, v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE, Polk Center, Christopher P. Gorton, as Agent and Employee thereof, and Christopher P. Gorton, an individual, Defendants. Civil Action No. 00-225. United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania. October 23, 2003. *640

[Cite as State v. Polk, 2016-Ohio-28.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State of Ohio, : Plaintiff-Appellant, : No. 14AP-787 v. : (C.P.C. No. 13CR-2787) Joshua Polk,

WINTER, Circuit Judge: The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Public School Employees’ Retirement System (“PSERS”) and Commerzbank AG (“Commerzbank”) appeal from Judge Scheindlin’s order of final judgment. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b). That judgment encompassed several previous orders that, as relevant to this appeal: (i) denied class certification under Fed.R.Civ.P. 23 b

JAMES HUNTER, III, Circuit Judge, dissenting: We fully agree with the majority opinion’s affirmance of the district court’s holding that the City violated the notice and hearing requirements of the regulations, and that such violation states a claim under section 1983, 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1982). We also agree that this statutory ground is dispositive, and thus that this court need not consider the fourteenth amend

Kennedy, J. *30 I. INTRODUCTION {¶ 1} In this discretionary appeal, we decide whether the Tenth District Court of Appeals erred in affirming the judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas granting a defense motion to suppress evidence seized during the warrantless search

750 F.2d 250 Luvinia ALEXANDER, for herself and as guardian ad litem forSharifa Alexander; Sylvia Bey, for herself and as guardianad litem for Trustin Bey; Irene Burkett, for herself and asguardian ad litem for Robert Burkett; Andrea Carey, forherself and as guardian ad litem for Leslie Bonita Rex;Sheila Mitchell, for herself and as guardian ad litem forTamika Mitchell; and Elizabeth Truitt, for herself and asguardia

935 F.Supp. 624 (1996) Sharlene COXSON, Plaintiff, v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare, and Polk Center, Defendants. Civil Action No. 95-106 ERIE. United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania. February 21, 1996. *625 Joel S. Sansone, Scanlon & Sansone, Pittsburgh, PA,

OPINION BY Judge P. KEVIN BROBSON. In this appeal from the Board of Finance and Revenue (Board), Petitioner Nextel Communications of the Mid-Atlantic, Inc. (Nextel) challenges the Board’s denial of its petition for refund of corporate net- income! (CNI)-tax paid to the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania for the tax year ending December 31, 2007 (2007 Tax Year)., In pursuing its refund, Nextel contends that the met los

913 A.2d 961 (2006) The PENNSYLVANIA LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION and Fidelity Home Abstract, Inc., Individually and as Representatives of All Other Individuals and Entities Similarly Situated v. EAST STROUDSBURG AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT, Dr. Rachel R. Heath, Superintendent of East Stroudsburg Area School District, Pleasant Valley School District, Dr. Frank A. Pullo, Superintendent Pleasant Valley School District, June O'Neill, Chestnuthill Township Tax Co

954 A.2d 1271 (2008) Mary Ann COTTONE and Reflection Builders Enterprise, Inc., Appellants, v. ZONING HEARING BOARD OF POLK TOWNSHIP. No. 292 C.D. 2007. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Argued April 9, 2008. Decided August 15, 2008. *1273 Daniel P. Lyons, Stroudsburg, for appellants. Robert C. Lear and

KELLEY, Judge. Appellants1 appeal from a final order of the Court of Common Pleas of Delaware *753County (Delaware County Court) which ordered that the dispute over the leadership of the “Church of the Lord Jesus Christ of the Apostolic Faith” is to be settled by an election. We vacate and transfer. The complex nature an

FILED FEBRUARY 22, 2024 In the Office of the Clerk of Court WA State Court of Appeals Division III IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION THREE In the Matter of

347 Pa. Superior Ct. 265 (1985) 500 A.2d 825 COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Alonzo POLK, Appellant. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Submitted May 23, 1985. Filed October 4, 1985. Reargument Denied December 5, 1985. *267 William P. James, Philadelphia, for appellant. Ann A. Nevel, As

Opinion by Judge Craig, Claimant Mary Polk appeals from the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review’s determination, after remand and rehearing, that she was ineligible for benefits under Section 402(e) of the Pennsylvania Unemployment Compensation Law, 43 P.S. 1802(e),1 the willful misconduct disqualification, because she failed, without good cause, to comply with her employer’s

OPINION PER CURIAM. David Eric Allen is a Pennsylvania prisoner. In May and June 2012, he filed complaints pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 challenging a number of events that allegedly occurred during the course of criminal proceedings in the Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas nearly two decades ago. Specifically, Allen alleged that: (1) Richard Winter, an attorney who represented Allen in the criminal proc

LAVORATO, Justice. This is a certiorari action to our court brought by the sheriff of Polk County seeking to reverse a district court decision denying the sheriffs application to compel jail inmate Jerrell Brown to submit to kidney dialysis treatment. We must decide whether the district court correctly found that Brown’s liberty interest to refuse such treatment outweighs the State’s countervailing interests to preserve life