Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
11 opinions for “PJC Realty MA, Inc.”
In re Thornburg Mortgage, Inc. Securities Litigationpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) ■ the Plaintiffs’ Motion for Final Approval of Proposed Settlement, Plan of Allocation and Certification of Class for Settlement Purposes, filed July 23, 2012 (Doc. 391)(“Motion for Final Approval”); and (ii) Co-Lead Counsel’s Motion for an Award of Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses and Memo
969 S.W.2d 31 (1998) MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, INC., Appellant, v. CITY OF BEAUMONT, Appellee. No. 06-97-00072-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Texarkana. Submitted January 28, 1998. Decided March 27, 1998. *33 John R. Mercy, Atchley, Russell, Waldrop, Texarkana, James DeAnda, Laura Friedl Jones, Solar &am;
Oak Mortgage Group, Inc. Michael H. Nasserfar Michael E. Task And Tycord R. Gosnay v. Ameripro Funding, Inc.public domain
ACCEPTED 03-15-00416-CV 7412400 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
American Sales Co. v. AstraZeneca LPpublic domain
ORDER OF COURT The various groups of plaintiffs have collectively filed three petitions for panel rehearing and two for rehearing en banc, raising various objections to the panel opinion. This order deals primarily with the petitions for panel rehearing. None of them has merit. End-Payor Class’s Petition The End-Payor Class, seeking only panel rehearing, argues that we must remand the case with
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-15-00300-CV IN THE INTEREST OF I.C., N.C., A.C., AND D.C., CHILDREN ---------- FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF PARKER COUNTY TRIAL COURT NO. CIV14-0275 ---------- MEMORANDU
In Re Lipitor Antitrust Litigationpublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT FISHER, Circuit Judge. A pharmaceutical company holding the patent on a drug sues the manufacturer of a generic version of that drug for patent infringement. The patent-holder and the generic manufacturer later settle, with the former paying the latter not to produce a generic until the patents at issue expire. In FTC v. Actav
In Re Lipitor Antitrust Litigationpublic domain
OPINION SMITH, Chief Judge. This opinion addresses two sets of consolidated appeals concerning two pharmaceutical drugs: Lipitor and Effexor XR. In both sets of consolidated appeals, plaintiffs allege that the companies holding the patents related to Lipitor and Effexor XR fraudulently procured and enforced certain of those patents. Plaintiffs further all
Wooley v. Lucksingerpublic domain
14 So.3d 311 (2008) J. Robert WOOLEY, As Commissioner of Insurance for the State of Louisiana v. Thomas S. LUCKSINGER, Michael D. Nadler, Stephen J. Nazarenus, Scott Westbrook, Michael K. Jhin, William F. Galtney, John P. Mudd, Executive Risk Indemnity, Inc., Executive Risk Management Associates, Executive Risk Specialty Insurance Co., Executive Liability Underwriters and Greenwich Insurance Co., AmCareco, Inc., AmCare Management, Inc. J. Rob
ACCEPTED 05-15-01513-CV 05-15-01513-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 12/11/2015 4:54:22 PM
the Port of Houston Authority of Harris County, Texas v. Zachry Construction Corporationpublic domain
ACCEPTED 14-10-00708-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 6/12/2015 5:04:25 PM
ACCEPTED 03-14-00518-CV 6061835 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS