Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “PIRCH, Inc.”
Harris v. Pirchpublic domain
677 F.2d 681 Brenda HARRIS, Appellee,v.Paul PIRCH, individually and as Sheriff of Johnson County,Missouri; Lawrence Kipping, individually and asDeputy Sheriff of Johnson County,Missouri, Appellants.Douglas Rusher. Nos. 81-1724, 81-2019. United States Court of Appeals,Eighth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 11, 1982.Decided May 14, 1982.
Harris v. Pirchpublic domain
McMILLIAN, Circuit Judge. Paul Pirch, sheriff, and Lawrence Kipping, deputy sheriff, appeal from a judgment entered in the District Court for the Western District of Missouri finding them liable for damages under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 to Brenda Harris based on her involuntary emergency commitment to the Western Missouri Mental Health Center (Mental Health Center) for observation and testing in August, 1979. Defendants Kipping and
Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL XII JULEISA PERALTA ARES Certiorari procedente del Tribunal de Querellante Recurrida Primera Instancia, Sala Superior de
Pirch v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.public domain
455 P.2d 189 (1969) Ray E. PIRCH, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. FIRESTONE TIRE & RUBBER CO., a corporation, Defendant-Appellant. No. 250. Court of Appeals of New Mexico. May 9, 1969. Certiorari Denied June 4, 1969. *190 John P. Burton, Robert M. St. John, Rodey, Dickason, Sloan, Akin & Robb, Albuquerque, for def
Blase v. Allied Signal Inc.public domain
CLARK, J. This court has been called upon to review defendants’ motion for summary judgment and plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration of the court’s order dated September 17, 1996. After careful consideration of the arguments presented, the motion for reconsideration is denied. As a consequence thereof, the motion for summary judgment is granted. The above-captioned action was filed by Mildred M. Blase as a re
Anaya v. Crossroads Managed Care Systems, Inc.public domain
ORDER ON PETITION FOR REHEARING HENRY, Circuit Judge. This matter is before the court on appellants’ petition for rehearing filed on September 20, 1999. The petition for rehearing is granted. The court’s opinion filed on September 3,1999, is withdrawn and an. amended opinion is attached to this order. OPINION
Lawrence L. Pedigo, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. P.A.M. Transport, Inc., Appellee/cross-Appellantpublic domain
MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judge. In this appeal and cross-appeal from an award of attorney's fees, defendant argues that plaintiff was not a "prevailing party" so as to be entitled to attorney's fees. We agree and therefore reverse. I. Plaintiff complained that he had been discriminated against in violation of the Americans with Disabif
Giant of Maryland, LLC v. Taylorpublic domain
*358 EYLER, DEBORAH S., J. Giant of Maryland, LLC (“Giant”), and Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America (“Travelers”), the appellants, challenge a judgment of the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County entered on a supersedeas bond (“the Bond”) in
L.M.E., Inc. v. City of Hollywoodpublic domain
605 F.Supp. 185 (1985) L.M.E., INC., Plaintiff, v. CITY OF HOLLYWOOD and Sam Martin, Defendants. No. 85-6176-Civ-Paine. United States District Court, S.D. Florida. March 25, 1985. As Amended April 19, 1985. *186 Bruce Randall, Fort Lauderdale, Fla., for plaintiff, L.M.E., Inc. Andrew DeGraffenreidt, City A
284 F.3d 923 Charles NAUCKE; Theresa Naucke; John Duval, Appellants,v.CITY OF PARK HILLS; James Link, personally and in his official capacity as City Administrator for the City of Park Hills, Appellees,Wheaton USA, Inc., a New Jersey corporation, Defendant.Charles Naucke; John Duvall, Appellees,v.City of Park Hills, Defendant,James Link, personally and in his official capacity as City Administrator for the City of Park H
Jacobson v. Pitman-Moore, Inc.public domain
582 F.Supp. 169 (1984) Doris JACOBSON, Plaintiff, v. PITMAN-MOORE, INC., a corporation, and Johnson & Johnson, Inc., a corporation, Defendants. Civ. No. 4-82-1186. United States District Court, D. Minnesota, Fourth Division. March 12, 1984. *170 *171 *172
PER CURIAM. Alvin Smith brought this employment discrimination action under both Title YII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and 42 U.S.C. § 1981. He alleges that Honeywell, Inc., and its subsidiary, Honeywell Information Systems, Inc. (Honeywell), discriminated against him because of his race in his initial hiring, in various acti
Duane Dewey Anderson v. Ind. School Dist. 97public domain
AMENDED OPINION LAY, Circuit Judge. Duane Anderson brought suit against Independent School District Number 97, its Superintendent Nancy Kaldor, and Transportation Supervisor Art Forse (collectively, the “School District”) asserting several claims, including defamation and a violation of the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act (“MGDPA”). Anderson alle
Hutchinson, B. v. Verstraeten, T.public domain
J-A18034-23 2023 PA Super 230 BRENDA HUTCHINSON AND : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF DOUGLAS HUTCHINSON : PENNSYLVANIA : Appellants : : v. : : THIERRY C. VERSTRAETEN, M.D.; E. : RONALD SALVITTI, M.D., INC., : INDIVIDUALLY, D/B/A : SOUTHWESTER
Teresa Graham v. Shannon Barnettepublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 19-2512 ___________________________ Teresa M. Graham Plaintiff - Appellant v. Sgt. Shannon L. Barnette; Officer Amanda Sanchez; Officer Mohamed Noor; City of
Duane Dewey Anderson v. Ind. School Dist. 97public domain
LAY, Circuit Judge. Duane Anderson brought suit against Independent School District Number 97, its Superintendent Nancy Kaldor, and Transportation Supervisor Art Forse (collectively, the “School District”) asserting several claims, including defamation and a violation of the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act (“MGDPA”). Anderson alleged that School District employees made d
Charles Naucke v. City of Park Hillspublic domain
BYE, Circuit Judge. Theresa Naucke appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against the City of Park Hills (Park Hills) and James Link, personally and in his official capacity as City Administrator for Park Hills. Charles Naucke and John Duvall appeal the district c
Leticia Rudolph v. Daniel Babinecpublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 19a0248p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT LETICIA RUDOLPH, ┐ Plaintiff-Appellee, │ │
Leticia Rudolph v. Daniel Babinecpublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 19a0248p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT LETICIA RUDOLPH, ┐ Plaintiff-Appellee, │ │
International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Inc. v. Colorado State Fair & Industrial Exposition Commissionpublic domain
673 P.2d 368 (1983) INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR KRISHNA CONSCIOUSNESS, INC., A Colorado corporation; Jack Lawrence Mahoney, also known as Kurusretha, and Steven Norman Schechter, also known as Siddhanta, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. The COLORADO STATE FAIR AND INDUSTRIAL EXPOSITION COMMISSION; Charles L. Thomson, Charles E. Kirk, Norval M. Anderson, Tom Haddass, Marelynn Zipser, Robert C. Norris, Dan Luna, Harry E. Green, Jr., Maurice Parker and Tom H