Cases

Armstead, Justice: *748 This appeal concerns the distinction between the ordinary taxation of timberland by the State of West Virginia and the taxation at a lower appraised value of timberland subject to a cooperative contract with the State Division of Forestry pursuant to the Division's M

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-24-00693-CV Patrick Amy and Ruth Amy, Appellants v. Phyllis West-Cobb through her Next Friend Tammy Lewis, Appellee FROM THE 423RD DISTRICT COURT OF BASTROP COUNTY NO. 423-6587, THE HONORABLE CHRISTOPHER DARROW DUGGAN, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION

141 S.W.3d 896 (2004) 84 Ark.App. 381 Jimmy C. LEWIS v. DIRECTOR, EMPLOYMENT SECURITY DEPARTMENT. No. E03-256. Court of Appeals of Arkansas, Division I. January 21, 2004. *897 Appellant, Mayflower, pro se. Phyllis A. Edwards, Little Rock, for appellee. WENDELL L. GRIFFEN, Judge. Jimmy

993 F.Supp. 382 (1998) Harold LEWIS, Plaintiff, v. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, and Kmart Corporation, Defendants. No. Civ.A. 97-1230-A. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division. February 11, 1998. *383 *384 Victor Michael Glasberg, Alexandria, VA, for Lewis. Ro

7 F.Supp.2d 743 (1998) Harold LEWIS, Plaintiff, v. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, and Kmart Corporation, Defendants. No. CIV. A. 97-1230-A. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division. June 11, 1998. *744 *745 Victor M. Glasberg, Jeanne Goldberg, Victor M. Glasberg & As

FILED Dec 06 2016, 5:47 am CLERK Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals and Tax Court ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANTS

ORDER AND JUDGMENT* MURPHY, Circuit Judge. After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not ma*293terially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted withou

982 F.Supp. 1158 (1997) Harold LEWIS, Plaintiff, v. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, and Kmart Corporation, Defendants. Civil Action No. 97-1230-A. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division. October 24, 1997. *1159 Victor M. Glasberg, Jeanne Goldberg, Alexandria, VA, for plaintiff. Phyllis E. Andes, Joh

ENTRY ORDER ¶ 1. Upon review of the hearing panel decision in this matter, the Court concludes as follows: The decision presents a well-reasoned discussion. Accordingly, the Court orders review of the decision on its own motion, adopts the hearing panel decision in its entirety as a final order of this Court, waives briefing and oral argument, and orders that the

GRIMES, Acting P. J. *229SUMMARY This case has its origin in a leak of natural gas from a Southern California Gas Company (SoCalGas) storage facility in Aliso Canyon, adjacent to the residential community of Porter Ranch, that began on October 23, 2015. The gas leak continued for months, causing damage to tho

02/10/2017 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE December 14, 2016 Session PHYLLIS ARRINGTON, ET AL. V. B.J. BROYLES, ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Greene County No. 12CV372 Douglas T. Jenkins, Chancellor1

AFFIRM; and Opinion Filed August 15, 2014. Court of Appeals S In The Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-00560-CV PHYLLIS M. REESE, Appellant V. BAN

Rel: March 14, 2025 Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate Courts, 300 Dexter Avenue, Montgomery, Alabama 36104-3741 ((334) 229-0650), of any typographical or other errors, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is published in Southern Reporter. ALABAMA COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OCTOBER TERM

642 F.Supp. 168 (1986) Leroy James LEWIS, Jr., and Phyllis Lewis, Plaintiffs, v. STORER COMMUNICATIONS, INC., Defendant. Civ. A. No. C85-3514A. United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division. June 27, 1986. *169 Albert E. Jones, Marietta, Ga., for plaintiffs. Judson Graves, Paul J. Quiner, Alston & Bird,

Appellant, Jimmy Lewis, was found guilty of rape, first degree. Sentence was imprisonment for life. The only issue presented on this appeal is whether the State proved the element of venue. The victim, Tamecia McCray, was taken by Lewis from a field to a store located in Houston County. The county line was approximately one and one-half miles from the store. McCray and Lewis left the store in an automobile and, according to testimony, went to some "bushes" where the despicable

Appellant Jimmy Lewis was found guilty of first degree rape and was sentenced to life imprisonment. The Court of Criminal Appeals, 461 So.2d 8, reversed. The state presents two issues on its petition for certiorari. The first issue is whether the defendant waived his objection to venue. The second issue is whether there was sufficient circumstantial evidence from which the jury could infer proper venue. The Court of Criminal Appeals held that the Sta

AMENDED OPINION WALKER, Circuit Judge: Eleven years ago, plaintiffs, a group of aliens living in New York, initiated this *1208lawsuit on behalf of themselves and all similarly situated persons seeking to enjoin the Secretary of Health and Human Services (the Secretary) from denying them Medicaid coverage based on their alienage status. Since t

501 S.E.2d 382 (1998) Phyllis B. TEAGUE and Jack C. Teague, Sr., Plaintiffs, v. RANDOLPH SURGICAL ASSOCIATES, P.A. and Winston Godwin, M.D., Defendants. No. COA97-784. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. June 16, 1998. *384 W. David McSheehan, Monroe, for plaintiffs. Brinkley, Walser, McGirt, Miller, Smith & Coles by S

POSNER, Circuit Judge. The plaintiffs, who appeal from the grant of a motion by the defendants (the members of the Illinois State Board of Elections) to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim, are working mothers who contend that because it is a hardship for them to vote in person on election day, the U.S. Constitution requires Illinois to allow them to vote by abs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA RADCLIFFE BANCROFT LEWIS ) Plaintiff, v; Civil Case No. 16-02510 (RJL) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURTS, et al. ) - I i eS t Defendants. AUG -5 2019 wnt. Clerk, U.S. District & Bankruptcy MEMORANDUM OPINION Courts for the District of Columbia (August “2,2019) [Dkt. # 1] This matter is before me on Radcliffe Bancroft Lewis’s (“plaintiff”) complaint (“Compl.”), ECF No. 1. Plaintiff's remaining claims are foreclosed by res judicata, predicate