⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “PHILLIPS v. STARBUCKS CORPORATION”

District Court, N.D. California · 2016-06-17 · Published · cited 17× · 192 F. Supp. 3d 1025; 89 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 1166; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79456; 2016 WL 3361842
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTIONS TO DISMISS THELTON E. HENDERSON, United States District Judge This matter came before the Court on June 1,2016, on Defendant Starbucks Corporation’s motions to dismiss Plaintiffs Si-era' Strumlauf and Benjamin Robles’ Class Action Complaint. Having carefully considered the parties written and oral arguments, and for the reasons set forth below
California Court of Appeal · 2022-10-27 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 10/26/22 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR COUNCIL FOR EDUCATION B309227/B310481 AND RESEARCH ON TOXICS, (Los Angeles County Plaintiff and Appellant, Super. Ct. No. BC435759) v. STARBUCKS CORP
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2015-06-30 · Published · cited 0× · 468 S.W.3d 398; 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 698; 2015 WL 3986163
DON E. BURRELL, J. This consolidated appeal requires us to interpret the terms of a loan agreement between Plaintiff John Walter Phillips (“Lender”) and Defendant Missouri TLC, LLC (“Borrower”). Defendants Doyle and Dennis Frost are members of Borrower. At the time of the loan, Dennis was married to Defendant Sandy Frost, and Doyle was married to Defendant Brenda Frost.1 The parties’ dispute was t
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016-02-24 · Published · cited 0× · 820 F.3d 1193; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 3225; 99 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,498; 128 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1601; 2016 WL 723012
Case: 12-15548 Date Filed: 02/24/2016 Page: 1 of 113 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT __________________________ No. 12-15548 __________________________ D.C. Docket No. 2:09-cv-
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016-02-24 · Published · cited 0×
Case: 12-15548 Date Filed: 02/24/2016 Page: 1 of 112 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT __________________________ No. 12-15548 __________________________ D.C. Docket No. 2:09-cv-
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980-05-29 · Published · cited 96× · 623 F.2d 645; 206 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 481; 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 17152
PER CURIAM. United Business Communications, Inc. (UBC) appeals from an adverse judgment in a patent infringement action initiated by Milgo Electronics Corporation (Milgo). Bifurcated trials to the Court on the issues of *650 liability and damages were h
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2015-06-30 · Published · cited 0×
JOHN WALTER PHILLIPS, ) ) Plaintiff-Appellant/Respondent, ) ) v. ) Nos. SD33173 and SD33259 ) (consolidated) MISSOURI TLC, LLC, DOYLE FROST, ) and DENNIS FROST, ) Filed: June 30, 2015 )
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · 2014-09-29 · Published · cited 0×
THIS OPINION IS A PRECEDENT OF THE TTAB Hearing: Mailed: November 14, 2013 September 29, 2014 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____ Trademark Trial and Appeal Board _____
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998-06-04 · Published · cited 0× · 149 F.3d 1190
149 F.3d 1190 98 CJ C.A.R. 2797 NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995,
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025-04-02 · Published · cited 0× · 2025 NY Slip Op 01906
L.D. v Brooklyn Kings Plaza, LLC (2025 NY Slip Op 01906) L.D. v Brooklyn Kings Plaza, LLC 2025 NY Slip Op 01906 Decided on April 2, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judi
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2025-07-22 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued May 15, 2025 Decided July 22, 2025 No. 24-5152 ARIANA CORTES AND KARAM LOGAN, APPELLANTS v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, APPELLEE Consolidated with 24-5166 Appeals from the United States District Court for the Distri
Cole v. CRST, Inc.public domain
District Court, C.D. California · 2016-04-01 · Published · cited 4× · 317 F.R.D. 141; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48940; 2016 WL 1367016
Order Decertifying the Meal and Rest Break Period Classes (Doc. No. 166) and Denying Motion for Leave to File a Third Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 173) Virginia A. Phillips, United States District Judge On December 4, 2016, Defendant CRST Van Expedited, Inc. (“CRST” or “Defendant”) filed a Motion for Decertification. (Doc. No. 166.) On January 11, 2016, Plaintiff James Cole (“Plaintiff’) filed an opposition (
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016-01-14 · Published · cited 27× · 810 F.3d 557; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 567; 2016 WL 158083
RILEY, Chief Judge. Brent Ballinger was serving an eight-year sentence in a Missouri Department of Corrections (DOC) prison when a Missouri state court judge granted Ballinger’s motion to vacate and set aside his conviction and sentence. The state court judge ordered that Ballinger be remanded to the custody of the Cedar County Sheriffs Department. While awaiting transfer, Balling
Court of Appeals of Iowa · 2021-11-23 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 20-1321 Filed November 23, 2021 S3 DEVELOPMENT, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, vs. HGR INVESTMENTS, INC., Defendant-Appellee. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Jeffrey D. Farrell, Judge. The plaintiff appeals district court’s grant of summary judgment in the defendant’
Oregon Supreme Court · 2024-05-02 · Published · cited 0×
No. 12 May 2, 2024 249 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON HOTCHALK, INC., both individually and derivatively on behalf of Concordia University, aka Concordia University—Portland, Plaintiff-Relator, v. LUTHERAN CHURCH—MISSOURI SYNOD; Lutheran Church Extension Fund—Missouri Synod,
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2025-09-25 · Published · cited 0×
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 24-AA-0582 YAZAM, INC., D/B/A EMPOWER, PETITIONER, V. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF
Oregon Supreme Court · 2024-05-02 · Published · cited 0×
No. 12 May 2, 2024 249 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON HOTCHALK, INC., both individually and derivatively on behalf of Concordia University, aka Concordia University—Portland, Plaintiff-Relator, v. LUTHERAN CHURCH—MISSOURI SYNOD; Lutheran Church Extension Fund—Missouri Synod,
Sturdivant v. Finepublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022-01-07 · Published · cited 9× · 22 F.4th 930
Appellate Case: 20-3147 Document: 010110628711 Date Filed: 01/07/2022 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS January 7, 2022
California Court of Appeal, 5th District · 2018-11-30 · Published · cited 23× · 240 Cal. Rptr. 3d 815; 29 Cal. App. 5th 725
BIGELOW, P.J. *818*727Employee Robin Edwards filed a putative class action lawsuit against employer Heartland Payment Systems, Inc. (Heartland) for *728myriad wage a
District Court, District of Columbia · 2025-03-31 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ESMERALDA VASQUEZ, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 24-cv-248 (TSC) UNITED STATES CAPITOL POLICE, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Esmeralda Vasquez brings this suit against United States Capitol Police (“USCP”), alleging discrimin