Cases

This Opinion Is a Mailed: Precedent of the TTAB November 16, 2012 United States Patent and Trademark Office Trademark Trial and Appeal Board ________ In re The Procter & Gamble Company ________ Serial Nos. 77685045 and 7768

This Opinion Is a Mailed: Precedent of the TTAB November 16, 2012 United States Patent and Trademark Office Trademark Trial and Appeal Board ________ In re The Procter & Gamble Company ________ Serial Nos. 77685045 and 776

ROBSON, District Judge. On October 8, 1962, I-T-E Circuit Breaker Company1 moved for an order of the Court that it need not produce a. copy of each of the documents described in paragraph 3(a) of Pre-Trial Order No'. 4, (entered September 26, 1962) i. e., documents “ ‘produced by such defendant before any Grand Jury in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania in the cours

307 F.2d 418 BANKERS LIFE & CASUALTY COMPANY, Appellant,v.C. M. KIRTLEY, Trustee in Corporate Reorganization Proceedings of Automatic Washer Company, Appellee. No. 16930. United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit. August 24, 1962. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED S. David Peshkin, of Bridges & Peshkin, and Wendell B. Gibso

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 24a0204p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ DENNIS SPEERLY; JOSEPH SIERCHIO; DARRIN DEGRAND; │ DANIEL

DISCUSSION Defendant seeks dismissal of the Complaint with prejudice on the following grounds: (1) the Court lacks personal jurisdiction over the claims asserted by Plaintiff Iliana Sanchez; (2) Plaintiffs' consumer protection claims fail because Plaintiffs have not alleged an actionable misrepresentation; (3) Plaintiffs' common law claims fail as a matter of law; and (4) Plaintiffs lack standing to seek prospective injunctive reli

629 F.Supp.2d 397 (2009) The DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. NOVA CHEMICALS CORPORATION (CANADA), and Nova Chemicals Inc. (Delaware), Defendants. Civil Action No. 05-737-JJF. United States District Court, D. Delaware. June 25, 2009. *398 Harry J. Roper, Esquire; Aaron A. Barlow, Esquire; Raymond N. Nimrod, Esquire and Darrick

(2008) CG ROXANE LLC, Plaintiff, v. FIJI WATER COMPANY LLC; Fiji Water Company Holdings LLC; Paramount International Export, Ltd; and Does 1-20, Defendants. No. C-07-02258 RMW. United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division. July 16, 2008. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT RONALD M. WHYTE, District Judge. <

PUDLOWSKI, Presiding Judge. Appellant-claimant, [hereinafter claimant], appeals the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission majority’s affirmance1 of the Administrative Law Judge’s 'denial of his Workers’ Compensation benefits claim. We affirm. Contrary to the Administrative Law Judge’s finding that the facts were not disputed, the Commission majority found the facts to be in d

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 25a0170p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ DENNIS SPEERLY; JOSEPH SIERCHIO; DARRIN │ DEGRAND; DANIEL DRAIN; WAVERS SMITH; RICHARD

NICHOLAS G. GARAUFIS, United States District Judge. *292Defendant Keith Raniere has been indicted on charges arising from his involvement in several hierarchical pyramid-structured organizations he founded. (Second Superseding Indictment ("Indictment") (Dkt. 430) ¶¶ 1-49.) These organizations included Nxivm, which purported to offer self-help c

MEMORANDUM ORDER ERICKSON, United States Magistrate Judge. I. Introduction This matter came before the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to a general assignment, made in accordance with the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A), upon the Motions of the Defendants for Leave to Amend their Answers in order to assert a statute of limitations defense.

OPINION STARK, United States District Judge: Plaintiffs — UCB, Inc., UCB BioPharma SPRL, Research Corporation Technologies, Inc., and Harris FRC Corporation (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) — allege that Defendants — Accord Healthcare, Inc., Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Alembic Pharmaceuticals, Ltd., Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC, Amneal Pharmaceuticals of New York, LLC, Aurobindo Pharma Ltd., Auro-bindo Pharma USA,

Opinion SPENCER, P. J. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs Linda McKell, Scott David Pasnikowski and Susan Nero appeal from an order of dismissal entered after the trial court sustained defendants’ demurrer to their second amended complaint without leave to amend. Plaintiffs challenge the propriety of the trial court’s ruling. We reverse the order of dismissal and direct the trial court to overr

576 F.Supp.2d 463 (2008) TIFFANY (NJ) INC. and Tiffany and Company, Plaintiffs, v. EBAY, INC., Defendant. No. 04 Civ. 4607(RJS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. July 14, 2008. *468 H. Peter Haveles, Jr., Esq. and James B. Swire, Esq. (Eleanor M. Lackman, *469 Esq., and Erik C. Wal

49 Cal.Rptr.3d 227 (2006) 142 Cal.App.4th 1457 Linda McKELL et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. WASHINGTON MUTUAL, INC. et al., Defendants and Respondents. No. B176377. Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division One. September 18, 2006. *233 Lerach Coughlin Stoia Geller, Rudman & Robbin

LOGAN, Circuit Judge. I This is a civil case filed by the Colorado Attorney General on behalf of the United States and the State of Colorado in federal district court as a qui tarn proceeding under a federal statute, the False Claims Act, now codified at 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-3731. Named as defendants were Robert M. Tynan and seven corporate entities involved in the operation of nursing home facilit

BENNETT, Senior Circuit Judge. Yamaha International Corporation (Yamaha) appeals from a decision of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB or board) in Yamaha International Corp. v. Hoshino Gakki Co., 231 USPQ 926 (TTAB 1986), dismissing Opposition Nos. 70,401 and 70,402 filed by Yamaha. We affirm. <

757 F.2d 1085 53 USLW 2497, 1 Fed.R.Serv.3d 246 UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Duane WOODARD, AttorneyGeneral of the State of Colorado, and the State ofColorado, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.Robert M. TYNAN; Arvada Nursing Home, Inc., a Coloradocorporation; BTZ Incorporated, a Colorado corporation;Columbine Manor Incorporated, a Colorado corporation;Garden Manor Nursing Home, Inc., a Colorado

309 F.Supp.2d 467 (2003) 1-800 CONTACTS, INC., Plaintiff, v. WHENU.COM and Vision Direct, Inc., Defendants. No. 02 Civ. 8043(DAB). United States District Court, S.D. New York. December 22, 2003. *468 *469 *470 *471 Marsh