Cases

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Dominguez Morales-Martinez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Morales-Martinez has filed a response and a motion for the appointment of new counsel. We have revi

Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL ESPECIAL PEDRO JOSÉ DE PEDRO Apelación MARTÍNEZ procedente del Tribunal de Primera Demandante Apelada Instancia, Sala

Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL ESPECIAL PEDRO JOSÉ DE PEDRO Apelación MARTÍNEZ procedente del Tribunal de Primera Demandante Apelada Instancia, Sala

Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL ESPECIAL PEDRO JOSÉ DE PEDRO Apelación MARTÍNEZ procedente del Tribunal de Primera Demandante Apelada Instancia, Sala

TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge. This case involves due process and political discrimination claims related to the procurement of public contracts by independent contractors. Plaintiff-Appellant Manuel A. García-González (“García”) alleges First and Fourteenth Amendment violations and seeks compensatory and punitive damages under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 over the rescission of a bid award for

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS MICHAEL J. GOPIN, § No. 08-14-00233-CV Appellant, § Appeal from the v. §

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS MICHAEL J. GOPIN, § No. 08-14-00233-CV Appellant, § Appeal from the v. §

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas JUDGMENT No. 04-20-00530-CV Abelardo G. GONZALEZ, Appellant v. Isidro R. ALANIZ and Pedro Morales, Appellees

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL IV Apelación procedente del PEDRO ALBERTO MARTÍNEZ Tribunal de VELÁZQUEZ Primera Instancia, Sala Parte Apelada Superior de San KLAN202400478 Sebastián v.

TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-appellant Nereida Ruiz-Casillas appeals the summary judgment entered in favor of defendants-appellees Mayor and Federal Programs Director of the Municipality of Humacao for claims of political discrimination under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Specifically, Ruiz contests the district court’s finding that she occupied a policy-making trust position, thereb

203 F.Supp.2d 92 (2002) UNITED STATES of America, v. MORALES-RIVERA, et al. Defendant. No. CR. 99-185(DBH). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. April 3, 2002. *93 *94 *95 Ana Berta Vazquez-Martinez, San Juan, PR, John F. Cicilline, Providence, RI,

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-20-00530-CV Abelardo G. GONZALEZ, Appellant v. Isidro R. ALANIZ and Pedro Morales,

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-14-00802-CR Pedro Elizondo Martinez, Jr., Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, 26TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 13-1936-K26, HONORABLE DONNA GAYLE KING, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION

24 F.3d 251NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Pedro MARTINEZ-TINOCO, aka Arturo Morales-Tsintzun,Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appelle

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING, IN PART, MOTION TO DISMISS MARCIA S. KRIEGER, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court pursuant to the Defendant’s (“Avanza”) Motion to Dismiss (# 14), the Plaintiffs’ response (# 17), and Avanza’s reply (# 20). FACTS Although lengthy, the Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint (# 3) describes a straightforward factual sc

JON 0. NEWMAN, Circuit Judge. This appeal requires us to determine whether a defendant’s prior offense is “similar to” the minor offenses listed in section 4A1.2(c)(l) of the Sentencing Guidelines, in which event it does not af- *115 feet his Criminal History Category nor contribute to rendering him

MEMORANDUM ** Pedro Alejandro Gonzalez-Morales, and Maria Isabel Oroeio Gonzalez, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) upholding an immigration judge’s order denying then-application for cancellation of removal. We lack jurisdiction to review the discretionary determination that petitioners have failed to sh

ERICKSON, Circuit Judge. Pedro Olea Camacho petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals's ("BIA") denial of his motion to reconsider the BIA's previous order denying him a discretionary adjustment of status. We deny the petition. I. Background Pedro Olea Camacho is a Mexican citizen who first entered the Unite

Córdova Arone, Juez Ponente *1018TEXTO COMPLETO DE LA SENTENCIA I Mediante recurso de apelación se nos solicita que revoquemos una sentencia de 1 de abril de 1996 emitida por el Tribunal de Primera Instancia, Sub-sección de Distrito, Sala de Yauco. En el referido dictamen se declara sin lugar una demanda en daños y perjuicios por