Cases

06/22/2020 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs April 15, 2020 PEDRO IGNACIO HERNANDEZ v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 2011-A-525 Monte Watkins, Judge ___________________________________

Upon consideration of the petition for discretionary review, filed by Plaintiff on the 30th of November 2018 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and the Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the petition for discretionary review as to additional issues is

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 28th of March 2019 by Plaintiff:"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 29th of March 2019."Plaintiff shall have up to and including the 5th day of April 2019 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 6th of December 2018 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 30th of January 2019."

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 4th of March 2019 by Plaintiff:"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of March 2019."Plaintiff shall have up to and including the 29th day of March 2019 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.

Davis, J. recused

Davis, J. recused

Davis, J. recused.

Davis, J. recused

Davis, J. recused.

Affirmed.

STROUD, Judge. *52 Defendant Pedro Hernandez, M.D. ("defendant") appeals a judgment upon a jury verdict finding him liable for breach of contract and an order denying his motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and for a new trial. Defendant has raised three issues on appeal regarding

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Cynthia S. Kern, J.), entered July 25, 2014, which granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and denied plaintiffs’ cross motion to amend and/or supplement the bill of particulars, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Dismissal of the complaint was warranted in this action where plaintiff Pedro Hernandez alleges that he

OPINION BERZON, Circuit Judge: Pedro Jose Hernandez-Cruz, a native and citizen of Guatemala, was convicted twice for second-degree commercial burglary, in violation of California Penal Code § 459. As a result, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) found him removable as an alien convicted of an aggravated felony, and also as an alien convicted of two

*762In a family offense proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, Pedro Hernandez appeals from an order of the Family Court, Queens County (Lebwohl, J.), dated August 4, 2011, which denied his motion to vacate an order of protection of the same court dated April 29, 2011, entered upon his default in appearing at a hearing. Ordered that the order dated August 4, 2011, is

*762In a family offense proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, Pedro Hernandez appeals from an order of the Family Court, Queens County (Lebwohl, J.), dated August 4, 2011, which denied his motion to vacate an order of protection of the same court dated April 29, 2011, entered upon his default in appearing at a hearing. Ordered that the order dated August 4, 2011, is

Garry, J. Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Madison County (DiStefano, J.), rendered January 4, 2012, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree. Defendant collided with a State Police vehicle on the New York State Thruway in Madison County and, in the inquiry that ensued, cocaine and marihuana were found in his pos

Garry, J. Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Madison County (DiStefano, J.), rendered January 4, 2012, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree. Defendant collided with a State Police vehicle on the New York State Thruway in Madison County and, in the inquiry that ensued, cocaine and marihuana were found in his pos

PER CURIAM: In this appeal, we consider whether, for purposes of federal habeas law, a Florida postconviction petition properly filed by a death-row prisoner claiming incompetency remains pending through the final resolution of the postconviction proceedings despite the state court’s having found the prisoner competent before the end of those proceedings. We hold that it does and conclude that the prisoner’s federal habeas

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Pedro Hernandez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Hernandez has filed a response. Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Hernandez’s response *364</